Goodyear plays Rachmaninov

Now I have a better idea what we missed.

Stewart Goodyear was in the news recently when the Toronto Symphony hired him to replace the scheduled pianist at the last minute: until he withdrew due to online harassment. On social media we heard about a wonderful rehearsal that never came to fruition with an actual performance for an audience, of Rachmaninov’s 2nd Piano Concerto.

click for purchase information

The timing was almost perfect when his new recording was released earlier this year: Goodyear playing the 2nd & 3rd Rachmaninov piano concerti with the Czech National Symphony. I can imagine his frustration, that what seemed like a godsend—and a wonderful opportunity to promote his brand-new CD –should fall through.

Yet they do say that there is no such thing as bad publicity. My CD order from Amazon took a long time, possibly because people have been ordering large numbers of the record. It did eventually turn up, and since then I have been listening to those two concerti a great deal in my car. This is not the first time Stewart Goodyear has left me perplexed. I should explain a bit.

I have given a great deal of thought to questions of virtuosi, especially those who are also composers. Franz Liszt was so much more than a great pianist, likely discovering new approaches to sound & composition while playing, thereby becoming a big but unacknowledged influence upon the music of the 20th century, especially via his son-in-law Richard Wagner.  I find myself listening to all composer-virtuosi differently, wondering where there explorations came from. My list of composers subsumed under that title will likely diverge from that used by more conservative students. I don’t limit myself to Liszt, Mendelssohn and Chopin for example. I’d include Debussy, Prokofieff, Shostakovich and Messiaen. Where would compositional vocabulary be without the discoveries Debussy made as an opera improviser, screwing around with the forbidden parallel harmonies that would work so well for him as to become virtually a trademark? As an improviser and inveterate jammer I find myself intrigued by sounds that seem to originate in a mysterious process that’s not easily amenable to logic. Messiaen is still rattling inside my head from Death & Desire this week via Topher Mokrzewski and Against the Grain.  Rachmaninov has therefore been a natural companion over the past few weeks (as i referenced him for his transcription of Wohin after seeing the preview concert at the RBA), as I examine the forbidden fruit of popular influence, melodic rather than dissonant, and embraced in several popular realms:

  • This is the same Rachmaninov piano concerto that is Tom Ewell’s irresistible tool to seduce Marilyn Monroe in The Seven Year Itch. Or as he puts it: “Good old Rachmaninov. The Second Piano Concerto. Never misses.” That’s the first movement
  • Movement 2? That’s the one that became a big seller in the 1970s. Listen to “All By Myself” by Eric Carmen and see if you recognize the debt to Rachmaninov
    …and then…
  • And the third movement of the concerto was for a time the most famous of all, more than half a century ago: “Full Moon and Empty Arms”.

There are great tunes in the Third Concerto too, but for whatever reason the piece has been left more or less un-plundered.

After the preamble I should get back to Goodyear and his new CD. Classical music is full of performers who, when challenged by a score from Beethoven or Rachmaninov, play the music exactly the way everyone else does. Now of course a musician doing the usual thing? That is not going to confuse anyone, although he or she may put a few people to sleep. But Stewart Goodyear has a habit of being different if not completely unexpected. The only thing that is predictable is that his playing will be unique.

I first encountered Goodyear via his Beethoven Marathon, a fascinating exercise that I understood originally as a kind of athletic feat (playing all 32 of the sonatas in a single day) not realizing how good the performances would be, how good they could be. Imagine performing a one-man version of four or five Shakespeare plays entirely from memory, and you begin to get some idea, except that playing Beethoven on the piano is that much more difficult.  I did not expect that in the process of discovering this talented young virtuoso, that he would replace all the other Beethoven interpreters I admired, to become absolutely #1. There were youtube performances of the first and last movements of the Hammerklavier Sonata, Op 106, the fugue finale played so quickly and adroitly that I had to completely change my understanding of the piece.  By now i have youtubed my readership with Goodyear’s reading of that fugue that i should almost have the url in my head.  There is also a live youtube video that I have shared a couple of times showing Goodyear playing the Appasionata finale faster than anyone I have ever encountered, note perfect on an upright piano.  A full set of all 32 sonatas was released with a remarkable set of accompanying liner notes from the pianist suggesting that his penetrating understanding of the music goes far beyond just playing: which is itself a significant achievement. Goodyear has also recorded the Diabelli variations.

And I read somewhere online that as a kind of sequel to his Beethoven marathon, he has a gig to play all five Beethoven piano concerti in a single mammoth concert in the autumn..! if i can get there i want to hear this.

Listening to Goodyear’s Rachmaninov has me –again—revising my expectations. I am reminded of a comment from U of T music professor Olnick long ago, reflecting on the musicianship of players long ago vs now.  He observed somewhat romantically that when we heard the quick violin runs in the Ride of the Valkyries, Wagner would have expected the ragged scraggly hair of a wild horse, not the pristine perfection we now sometimes encounter from a modern orchestra in a digital recording.  A century of improving musicianship has come between us and how those pieces likely sounded in the 19th century.  These concerti, too, are usually played as a flurry of notes, mostly correct with the occasional fluff, the occasional misplaced note, as though the pianist in collaboration with the orchestra were creating a chiaroscuro in a painting, shading light and dark, cleanness and some dirt too. Usually that is.

But Goodyear is of the 21st Century, playing with such athletic clarity as to bring Rachmaninov into focus in a way I have not heard before. While I wonder if Rachmaninov himself would have played this clearly, it does not really matter. This is an account of the concerti that in some respects gives a new look and feel to the works, the piano clean and effortless, with a kind of Olympian purity, muscular without sounding forced, powerful without being percussive. Accompanied by the Czech National Symphony cconducted by Heiko Mathias Förster, this is a confident account of Rachmaninov, lyrical and passionate.

I understand Goodyear has recorded the Grieg & 1st Tchaikovsky concerti as well, which I will have to check out next.

This entry was posted in Music and musicology, Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Goodyear plays Rachmaninov

  1. Pingback: Mahler’s Resurrection Symphony with the TSO | barczablog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s