Interviewing the busy soprano, Holly Chaplin

This blog is often a vicarious exercise, a way for a wannabe composer singer pianist to get closer to my heroes, a bit of wish-fulfillment.

In the process the reader gets my starstruck expressions of awe, while maybe we learn something about the artists and help promote their work.

Soprano Holly Chaplin

Case in point, Holly Chaplin.

I’m a longtime admirer of her work as an opera singer. In 2016 I said this about her appearance in James Bond: A Convenient Lie (Opera in Pasticcio):
I’ve never seen the Queen of the Night not only hit her high notes but do martial arts at the same time.

But this was not the Queen of the Night, it was the aptly named Ample Bliss, wonderfully portrayed by Holly Chaplin. 

The angry tune (“Der Hölle Rache”) is a natural for gun-play, so we had that too.

I’ve reviewed Holly several times, always impressed & delighted by her work, her wit and her personality.

Because she has so many gigs coming up in the next few weeks it seemed like the ideal opportunity to ask her a few questions.

And she answered.

*******

Barczablog: Are you more like your father or mother?

Holly Chaplin; Hmm That’s a question I’ve actually never been asked. I ‘look’ more like my mom, but my personality is definitely from my dad. My parents are both musical people, yet in stark contrast. My dad never took lessons but has an amazing ear for harmonies. Many of my childhood memories are of him ‘figuring something out at the piano’. If anything he was the source material for one of those High School Musical kids. He was in track and field, played guitar/sang in a band, and was also involved in his highschool music theatre program where he sang the role of Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar.

My mom had a more traditional slavic musical upbringing; Conservatory piano lessons, baptisms by fire in regard to stage fright, siblings being forced into cruel competition with each other..those who know, know. Luckily things were actually fun in the public school orchestra where she played the trumpet. I admire that she still has a thirst to learn. Before she retired she started taking flute lessons and still plays to this day. Before the war, my grandfather worked in the theatre painting sets for operas and plays. My grandparents loved the opera, especially La Traviata and Rigoletto. I suppose my connection with opera makes my mom feel connected to them when she misses them most.     

BB: What is the best or worst thing about what you do?  

Holly Chaplin; The best part of singing is the singing..duh, right? I love learning a score, and meeting new people(or working with my dear usual suspects) to create a show together. I feel the most alive when I perform. There’s great ease in living in a predictable, and temporary universe. It’s literally the holodeck (Star Trek reference..the OG VR)

The worst things…I have been incredibly lucky and I am grateful, but when you’re doing well it can be a serious grind for your mental health; ‘Being perfect’ or just the anxiety of getting sick. I’ve had to cancel, and I’ve had to learn how to say no. It’s a growing pain for sure.

BB: Who do you like to listen to or watch?   

Holly Chaplin; I love to listen to Lisette Oropesa. She is so talented, and from her vlogs, she seems to be the salt of the earth. When I need inspiration I listen to her, Joan Sutherland or Maria Callas.

Recently I find it relaxing to watch those videos on Tiktok of that hydraulic crushing machine crush stuff, or that guy who smashes glass bottles filled with paint off of his garage roof. I also have my comfort shows like all millennials; Superstore, the Office, Fleabag, and House.

BB: What ability or skill do you wish you had, that you don’t have?     

Holly Chaplin; Being multilingual. I can fake it pretty good because of diction studies, but I would love to actually be able to converse.  A real win would be to have a Parisian not answer me in English.

BB: I know what you mean, OMG the sense of triumph ordering a meal in Montreal (I’ve never been to Paris) entirely in French without the waiter switching over to English. Success!

When you’re just relaxing and not working, what is your favourite thing to do?      

Holly Chaplin; I love to play volleyball, go camping or taking the dogs for a hike.

BB: Dogs! are you more of a dog person or a cat person?

Holly Chaplin: I love both. I am more of a dog person ’cause I’m allergic to cats but love them! I had a cat for 17 years.

That’s Minkie.

BB: So could you tell me about your dogs, names – breeds – age..?

Holly Chaplin: This is Richie.

He’s 11 now.

Holly Chaplin; This is Trudy, a Mexican rescue. She’s 8.

And Cocoa is 8.5. They are both rescue dogs from Mexico. They are mutts.

Holly Chaplin; I also love to see movies with my partner, whether it’s at home or in the theatre. My brother is a literature person so I love to discuss plays and where they show up in tv/movies. We saw Who’s Afraid of Viriginia Woolf and had to watch the Dinner Party episode of the Office, which was inspired by Albee’s hit. I love when you find those gems.

BB: What was your first experience of music?     

Holly Chaplin; It would have to be Disney movies like Fantasia, Little Mermaid, the Lion King etc.  I am the youngest of 4, with one TV everyone could agree on a Disney movie. My siblings joined a community choir and of course I wanted to join in too, and the rest is history.

BB: March 8th you sing the title role in Lucia di Lammermoor in Burlington for Southern Ontario Lyric Opera.  That probably fits your voice well.  How does it feel?

Holly Chaplin; I am very excited to sing Lucia. She is a dream role for me..since I was a teen! I am excited to portray her because of how Donizetti’s score really highlights the amygdalic nature of the teen brain. Many productions make Enrico a tyrant, Edgardo some romantic hero, and Lucia some teary eyed pig to slaughter. To me, Enrico has the burden of having to be a parent/brother to a teen, better yet a child, who has started a love affair with a grown man who he has generational beef with. Sure, he is a gambler and needs Lucia to marry Arturo to get out of debt. Perhaps he’s also trying to avoid teen pregnancy since Lucia, a ghost chasing thrill-seeker is discovering love. For her that’s so exciting, but a big part of the excitement is that the love is forbidden. Then Edgardo, her jacobite lover,  offers to put aside his differences with the Ashtons to honorably ask for Lucia’s hand…but Lucia finds his rage too exciting to pass up…and he’s like ‘Okay’…in a nutshell.

Lucia can be passive aggressive, and at times manipulative which is no surprise since that’s the parenting style Enrico has. Ultimately they are similar people.  The main difference between the two siblings; Enrico’s brute strength, and Lucia uses her emotions for manipulation. He’s just more familiar with her tricks than she is with his.

Ah the mad scene. I love mad scenes; especially Lucia’s. It’s a real marathon of a sing but it is an absolute joy. The dramatic pacing, the levels of ‘madness’…and perhaps Lucia’s prefrontal cortex maturing(a bit) when she realizes the gravity of killing Arturo. I love Donizetti’s writing. His characterization is really special and I can understand those Come Scritto productions; It’s perfect writing.

BB: March 22nd when you sing Beethoven’s 9th & Bruckner te deum with Scarborough Philharmonic Orchestra, what’s that like so far?

Holly Chaplin; I am excited to sing my first Beethoven’s 9 and Bruckner’s Te Deum with the Scaraborough Philharmonic Orchestra. I get to sing with Veronika Anissimova, Corey Arnold and Luc Lalonde. We were supposed to mount this program in 2020..and now we’re getting the band back together! I love working with Veronika, Corey and I look forward to working with Luc Lalonde. They are fabulous musicians and lovely people too. Toronto Choral Society will be doing the heavy lifting, led by Geoffrey Butler. Geoff is a singer’s dream when it comes to conducting. He has been a precious resource for me, especially for nuanced phrasing.

On April 25th Voicebox- Opera in Concert present Robert le Diable, when you sing the role of Isabelle.  I don’t know the opera at all. Please tell us about your role and the work.  

Holly Chaplin; I came across Lisette Oropesa’s performance of Isabelle around 2021 on youtube. She was stellar. I started learning the role for funsies..mostly cause there wasn’t much else to do during the pandemic. Then I got the role offer in 2024! If I can pass on some knowledge to anyone, it is; learning something is never a waste of time.

Isabelle, and almost every role in Robert Le Diable, is coloratura dominant…well, coloratura fun if you ask me! Lots of runs and highnotes 🙂 My main concern for the role is sounding French. My teacher Frederique Vezina, is helping me achieve the task of sounding so French that I’ll be the envy of croissants everywhere! My words..She is a good sport and always laughs at my terrible jokes.

My basic breakdown; Princess Isabelle is hosting a tournament. Her father is forcing her to marry the winner. She hopes that the apple of her eye and ringer, Robert, won’t let her down..again. He is a handsome Knight with impulse control issues…who loves to get into trouble. Isabelle has to decide if Robert is worth the trouble that he is. It’s a classy version of Jersey Shore. Of course there are more details including witchcraft, ‘fathers’ and fights galore…but I’m just hanging a carrot here.

BB: Do you have any upcoming projects / shows / workshops you might want to mention / promote? 

Holly Chaplin; The problem is I have a lot of ideas, but producing is expensive. I am trying to cook up a protest recital for May or June…stay tuned!

BB: Sounds exciting!

Holly Chaplin;  I am most inspired by Alex Cappellazzo’s violent positivity and entrepreneurial spirit. He’s putting on a great concert called Brews, Beauties and Brawlers on March 1st with an amazing cast of under represented singers. If you can go, go!

Alexander Cappellazzo founder of Apocryphonia and the Diapente Renaissance Vocal Quintet

BB:  Thanks for the tip!

Do you believe Toronto companies could work harder to hire Canadian artists instead of importing singers from USA or Europe?   

Holly Chaplin; Honestly, I don’t really want to comment on today’s COC since it’s in transition. The Neef years did a real number on them…I stopped going to the COC altogether for a multitude of reasons. Besides throwing money at imported stars, I believe Neef never understood our culture, nor cared to.

One thing I will say is that the COC needs to give up on trying to compete with the Met, and they need to embrace what makes our sports so successful in regard to attendance; HOME GROWN TALENT! People are willing to partake in expensive hockey culture because most people have a ‘6 degrees of separation’ relationship with big hockey players. A lot of people grew up playing them because of its grassroots movement! There are leagues available from ages 5-99!  We have a grassroot movement for musicians and it falls by the wayside because we rarely see our people on the Canadian Opera Company’s stage, and if we do it’s either in a tiny role or to fill-in at the last minute. So many great musicians teach private lessons, run community choirs, orchestras, theatre groups etc, and I believe hiring these musicians would be a better strategy in the long run to cultivate audiences. A local scene is essential to any economy, especially with the arts. Outside of Hockey, our institutions at the highest levels really have a confidence problem when it comes to trusting the abilities of our own people. We have great training, amazing facilities and an abundance of talent..yet it never seems good enough. Canadian artists have to leave Canada for success in CANADA! Frankly, Canada’s lack of faith in itself is shameful.

BB:Agreed! Canadian talent is very good even if you’d never know it the way imported artists continue to take jobs from Canadians. How is it that Stratford or Shaw can employ Canadians, that the National Ballet can employ Canadians, that almost every other opera company in Canada employs Canadians… I get that it’s a tricky thing when you’re seeking quality. My benchmark for imports has always been to ask “can a Canadian sing it?” They imported Christine Goerke because they didn’t know of any available Canadian dramatic sopranos who could sing Brunnhilde. But it makes me nuts when I see an import singing a role that a Canadian could sing. Yes this is an obsession of mine.

And by the way I said the following about your Queen of the Night for Opera York in 2023:
Holly Chaplin’s Queen of the Night was sung as well as I’ve ever heard the role sung, and with the aid of Richmond Hill Centre’s superb acoustics, her pinging coloratura was especially dazzling….No it’s not a competition, but I take exception when the Canadian Opera Company bring in singers from abroad when there are so many excellent Canadians available and needing employment.  I came to the show knowing I’ve get to enjoy Holly Chaplin and tenor Ryan Downey as Tamino…I found Holly and Ryan better than the people singing their roles with the COC downtown in their 2022 revival of Magic Flute in Toronto.
And I think it’s particularly troubling right now when the phrase “buy Canadian” has taken on a particular urgency….

BB: Next question..!
Are opera programs doing enough to prepare students for the business?    

Holly Chaplin; So much of ‘the business’ is finding your own path. Sure some programs offer opportunities with musicians who had a career, but what worked for them then is probably obsolete in today’s industry. I think it would be wise to offer courses in how to do your taxes as a musician, or how to write a grant! Better yet, they should just teach musicians how to just start a new life in another country since that was ‘the’ suggestion from almost every professor, especially for singers. There is a lot to figure out since YOU are a business.

BB: Do you have any teachers or influences you would want to mention?    

Holly Chaplin; YES X 1000!!

Frederique Vezina, Narmina Afendyeva, Julie Nesrallah, Dom De Kauwe, Stephanie Bogle, Sabatino Vacca, Guillermo Silva Marin, Geoffrey Butler, Zimfira Poloz, Maria Riedstra and Ann Cooper-Gay for believing in my talent.

I also want to shout out to some of my amazing colleagues future and past who continue to inspire me; Amy Moodie, Matt Chittick, Catharyn Carew, Natalya Gennadi Matyusheva, Kristine Dandavino, Jonelle Sills, John Holland, and Andrew Tees! I’m pretty sure this entire list would be a fantastic Wagnerian cast! I want to mention more but the list would be endless!

*******

Holly Chaplin has a few appearances coming up in 2025:

March 8th:
Lucia in Lucia di Lammermoor with Southern Ontario Lyric Opera (tickets/info)

March 22nd:
Beethoven’s 9th & Bruckner’s Te Deum with Scarborough Philharmonic Orchestra (tickets/info)

April 25th:
Isabelle in Robert le Diable with Voicebox- Opera in Concert (tickets/info)

Posted in Interviews, Opera | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Appreciating Canadian Artists on Flag Day

The day after Valentine’s Day, February 15th 1965, the new Canadian flag replaced the old one.

On both February 14th and 15th we see red, both days to show our love.

Twenty-nine years ago, in 1996 Jean Chretien proclaimed “Flag Day” on what was the 31st anniversary of the flag’s proclamation. 29 + 31 makes this the 60th anniversary of the flag. I recall the controversy at the time in 1965, and the proposed designs. Some people didn’t want to give up the old red ensign.

We watched the ceremony on television in class. I remember a classmate saying “I’m going to miss that old flag.” I kept silent, a bit confused. “Old flag”? I was 9 years old.

It still feels brand new: but then again, so too our culture. At one time the big topic was “Canadian Identity” because nobody really knew what “Canadian culture” even meant. The current response to tariffs with the mantra “shop Canadian” will also be part of that culture.

I just wanted to toss a few of my favourites out there, as we remember our Canadian artists and writers. One can shop Canadian with books, music and the arts. This is my little celebration, please feel free to enjoy this: and maybe keep Canadians in mind when you’re shopping, let alone helping the arts through your dollars.

What follows is a gallery in alphabetical order.

Chris Abraham
Emily D’Angelo
Nina Lee Aquino
Jane Archibald (photo: Michael Cooper)
Margaret Atwood
Measha Brueggergosman-Lee
Andrew Burashko
Composer, musician, innovator, teacher John Mills-Cockell
Jonathan Crow
Violinist James Ehnes (photo: Ben Ealovega)
David Fallis (Photo credit: Paul Orenstein, digital work by Ross Duffin, background by Gerrit Dou 17th century, Dutch).
Ken Gass

Peter Hinton-Davis
Linda (left) and Michael Hutcheon signing their book for an eager audience.
Joel Ivany
Lauren Margison, Richard Margison and Valerie Kuinka
Michael Hidetoshi Mori 
Playwright & director Wajdi Mouawad
Richard Ouzounian
Sarah Polley
Arkady Spivak
Kiefer and Donald Sutherland
Mezzo-soprano Krisztina Szabo (photo: Bo Huang)
Herr Handel (Ivars Taurins) stares off into space, disconcerted to receive a special message telling him that no it’s not Tom Thomson Hall.
Jean Stilwell, Rebecca Caine, David Warrack and Ben Heppner

Posted in Essays, Personal ruminations & essays, Popular music & culture | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Rachel Fenlon’s Winterreise

Tonight Music TORONTO presented Rachel Fenlon’s solo performance of Schubert’s Winterreise.

This isn’t the usual winter journey. One normally expects a singer and a pianist to undertake this romantic cycle of 24 songs. It’s less usual to have a female singer, unprecedented to have a self-accompanied Winterreise.

Rachel Fenlon (photo: Jeremy Knowles)

To be honest, my first thoughts as she came onto the stage for the concert was the simple fact of Rachel’s feat. I would compare it to watching Stewart Goodyear play all the Beethoven piano sonatas in a series of concerts in a single day. Perhaps artistry should have been my first consideration, but first I was simply struck by the magic of seeing something I’d never seen before, a singer accompanying herself in this cycle, playing almost note perfect. It felt a bit like a happening, an event. For anyone who sings or plays (and I saw a few artists in attendance) it’s a bit of a jaw-dropping experience to see and hear the cycle done this way.

I say that as a kind of preamble, before I admit that I did not expect Rachel’s reading of the cycle to be such a stunning achievement, not just an athletic feat but a genuine revelation showing me new ways of understanding the cycle.

Rachel Fenlon (photo: Insonia Production) 

In the very first song I was amazed by what I was hearing, a remarkable approach to dynamics. I suppose a singer collaborating with a pianist could theoretically do the same thing, but it felt so tight. It’s so unique, that I was about to write the word “they”, thinking of the singer and the pianist working together: but wait this was just from one person. The range of intensity varied quite sharply, gradually a little louder, or a little softer, with a piano part precisely attuned to the voice.

The pianism took me by surprise. Yes I knew already that Rachel is truly a double threat, as impressive at the keys as she is with her singing: but the interpretation is highly original, as I watched her playing a unique version of Schubert. Letzte Hoffnung (last hope) for example, a song where the piano part stabs at you with its pointilistic agonies, doesn’t have to be a smooth pairing if the piano sound seems to erupt from inside of the poet, the irrationality of it wonderfully disturbing. As we watch Rachel the sounds bursting out of the piano almost seemed to surprise her. It was chilling.

At times it’s a huge task, that for some of these songs the artist playing and singing is up to their eye-balls coping with complexities. It’s an amazing feat, and yet I never felt that Rachel missed anything. She knew every note, every nuance, a one-woman show that she has rehearsed perfectly. It’s a stunning achievement.

My favourite songs didn’t disappoint.

I have always loved Die Post (the post-horn), a beautiful little drama with the hint of riding rhythms, about a possible letter, shifting back and forth between major and minor with the hope and despair of the protagonist. Perfect (but so were all of the songs).

The last two were like a unit, first Die Nebensonnen (the mock suns) and then Der Leiermann (the Hurdy-gurdy man) , Rachel almost vanishing into the keyboard as she seemed overwhelmed by what she was feeling, what she was revealing to us. For that final song it’s self-referential, a reminder that she is like the Hurdy-gurdy man, also making music.

Jane Mallett Theatre was ideal for this sort of presentation, an intimate venue allowing Rachel to sing and play a great deal of mezzo-piano and pianissimo, employing a stunning legato. More than once I found myself thinking about the range of voice advertised as “soprano” that ventured so easily to the lowest notes one might expect. But this wasn’t a soprano piece. It’s usually a tenor or a baritone.

I need to check out the recorded version that Rachel released in the fall. We experienced something very vivid in the live performance, a 24-part journey, that felt fresh and instantaneous. I wonder how she approached it on the recording.

Rachel Fenlon (photo: Insonia Production)

This is a morning-after addition. I meant to offer my appreciation for the titles, which were big and bold.

I asked Rachel if she participated in making them, or if they were created by Music TORONTO.
Rachel replied
“Yes! I made the files and wonderful Maíri [Demings] from music Toronto operated them.”

I felt they were very good, calling them the gold standard.

Rachel said
“I’m so glad we did them – it makes such a difference and I prefer it to paper… all that rustling drives me crazy!”

Agreed. I wish other organizations such as the TSO would take this to heart. It’s also worth noting that while the Canadian Opera Company pioneered surtitles, they could do better. For their co-production (co-produced with Opéra de Montréal) of La Reine-Garçon every word in French is given a title plus the translation into English. I compared that to Madama Butterfly last weekend, when there are times when we get a title, and then people sing verses and the surtitle space is blank. Perhaps somebody assumes that we remember what it all means, as in Pinkerton’s “Addio, fiorito asil”. Yes he’s repeating lines he has already sung. So is it assumed that because we saw the translation, that we will know what each line means and we don’t need titles? I would prefer to have the option to have the title there even if I know what the words mean. What was so exceptional with Rachel’s titles was not only their thoroughness, but their bold size. Some of us have trouble reading the small text. Why not use a bigger font?

Posted in Music and musicology, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jan Lisiecki plays Beethoven concerti

I’m going to stop calling Jan Lisiecki a young pianist. I just looked up his birthday, saw that on March 23rd he turns 30. But it’s not about the numbers.

Tonight I heard the first of two concerts from Jan playing all five Beethoven piano concertos while leading the Toronto Symphony from the keyboard. Tonight we heard concerti #1, 2 and 4. Tomorrow night he plays #3 and 5.

He has grown tremendously over the past decade, no wonder a full house showed up mid-week eager to hear him.

Nine years ago I saw Jan play with the TSO on their tour of Florida, Peter Oundjian leading the TSO as it accompanied Jan playing concerto #4. Peter was the leader, the protective elder. Jan was still someone we would call “young”.

A lighter moment from rehearsal with Jan Lisiecki and Peter Oundjian back in 2016 (photo: Michael Morreale)

And yet the interpretations were mature. I recall one of the performances in particular, when Jan and Peter did not seem to be in agreement. Jan played the opening passage very slowly and thoughtfully. Peter then brought in the orchestra at the same tempo: which was somewhat awkward for a few bars, until he managed to bring them up to speed. It wasn’t the first time I wondered about the future, as the famous interpreter of Chopin explored other music.

Of course the implications of that performance didn’t hit me until today, when I realized what we needed was exactly what we got tonight. Instead of having Jan accompanied by someone else with their own ideas, we had the thrill of hearing Jan as the piano soloist while he also led the orchestra as well. That way we had unity, a coherent interpretation, and really heard what Jan wanted to say. While I know Jan would never say a word against Peter, who was always a kind & supportive friend and mentor, part of maturity is emerging from the shadow of teachers, boldly taking the stage. That’s what we heard.

Jan Lisiecki playing Beethoven (photo: Jae Yang)

The concerti are all somewhat different, reflecting the evolution of the composer. Beethoven’s first two concerti sound more like Mozart or Haydn, pieces whose symmetry and balance reflect a witty approach that never oversteps proper decorum, even if the scope and scale begin to hint at what’s to come, the baby beethoven soon to become louder and stronger.

Before intermission we heard those first two. Jan’s readings are clean as ever, his cadenzas especially exciting because for the moment his attention is not divided but fully available for the piano in those magic moments. The orchestral playing is soft and gentle for the most part, restrained except for a few big climaxes.

Jan Lisiecki conducting from the piano (photo: Jae Yang)

And sometimes Jan even conducted with one hand while the other was playing.

Jan Lisiecki

And after intermission came that remarkable 4th concerto, the ideal piece to show an artist’s growth considering that the work is itself a stunning specimen of creativity. This was an interpretation unafraid of being playful, emotional, soulful, lyrical, bold or introspective. The romantic was unafraid to explore the contrasting possibilities of the piece, varying his tempo and leaning into the faster passages, pushing the orchestra to stay with him. While the fast passages were quicksilver, they were delicate and always clean.

Jan had a busy night, considering that he played and conducted over 90 minutes on the three pieces. He still has the same extraordinary posture, the same stunning technique, now in combination with his conducting. His energy was if anything better when we came to the last movement of the 4th concerto.

Jan Lisiecki conducting the TSO before an enthusiastic full house at Roy Thomson Hall (photo: Jae Yang)

Thursday night Jan will play and lead the TSO in the 3rd and 5th piano concerti of Beethoven at Roy Thomson Hall. I’d go if I could, from what I saw and heard tonight. I’m sure it will be brilliant.

Posted in Music and musicology, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

A first look at La Reine-Garçon

I attended the Canadian Opera Company’s presentation of La Reine-Garçon, their co-production of a new opera with a libretto by Michel Marc Bouchard and music composed by Julien Bilodeau.

Today, February 2nd, is Bouchard’s birthday. In addition to this libretto for an opera co-commissioned and co-produced with Opéra de Montréal, Bouchard wrote the screenplay for The Girl King, a 2015 film that tells a similar story to the opera.

Instead of Girl King we get Queen Boy (Reine-Garçon).

Opera is a very different medium, especially once composer Julien Bilodeau has his turn, a piece that I think is much much better than the film. Speaking as someone who tries to go to every new opera I can attend, I’m very glad to hear what Bilodeau has created, adding something wonderful to the story. I will go see another performance later in the run. My priority is to talk about the composition, although I shall also write about the production and its cast.

There are several things I could talk about but I want to call attention to something rare in this opera. Bilodeau’s setting displays a sense of humour. Sometimes he’s ironic, sometimes he’s blatantly funny. But I can’t recall the last time I heard that in an opera although it would be from the 20th century in something like Rake’s Progress (Stravinsky) or L’Heure espagnole (Ravel). Opera seems to have lost its sense of humour when we look at the operas of Philip Glass or John Adams or Thomas Adès.

Not so with Bilodeau! There were three different scenes displaying irony and humour, so much so that I heard big laughs from the audience.

Mother (Aline Kutan) confronts daughter Christine (Kirsten MacKinnon, photo: Michael Cooper)

In the scene where we meet Christine’s mother, a soprano who might remind you of the excessive outbursts of the Queen of the Night, especially as we saw her in the film Amadeus (where Milos Forman shows her coloratura as if the composer is sending up his nagging mother-in-law), there are more notes sung as laughter than words, laughter picked up by the audience. The role is memorable, full of startling sounds from soprano Aline Kutan who was once the Queen of the Night in a COC production of Magic Flute awhile back.

Count Johan and his friends think they’re impressing Christine (Kirsten MacKinnon, photo: Michael Cooper)

In the scene where Johan attempts seduction in the attire of a stag, prancing about the stage before being rejected by Christine, the music is very playful. We heard something similar in the piano paraphrase played at the RBA concert a couple of weeks ago, suggestions of dance rhythms. It’s absurdly excessive. Isaiah Bell played this part opening night but because he was indisposed today, we heard Wesley Harrison, currently a member of the Ensemble Studio, earning some of the biggest applause of the day.

A scene from Canadian Opera Company’s presentation of La Reine-Garçon (photo: Michael Cooper)

And the scene where Rene Descartes probes human anatomy seeking to understand how the brain works is bizarre in the best way, his ambitions clearly shown. As in the piano paraphrase, we heard music that’s as complex as a brain that’s overthinking. It was great to hear Owen McCausland again for the first time in a few years.

A scene from Canadian Opera Company’s presentation of La Reine-Garçon (photo: Michael Cooper)

Bilodeau used a recurring sound from the first scene until the last regularly throughout the opera, identified as kulning, a strident animal call sung without vibrato by soprano Anne-Marie Beaudette. Sometimes we would be looking at a landscape, snow falling or northern lights, achieved via wonderful projections by Alexandre Desjardins, the sound like an atmospheric effect, jarring even as the opera went on.

Christine (Kirsten MacKinnon) on stage with CGI northern lights (photo: Michael Cooper)

I am looking forward to hearing the opera again, hesitant about trying to characterize Bilodeau’s compositional voice when I’ve just discovered him first at the piano concert last month and now at the opera. But there’s a dramatic logic to Bilodeau’s choices, sometimes encouraging quick exchanges between singers, sometimes letting them sing something more like an aria with more lyricism.

That’s especially true of the Christine and Count Karl Gustav. Each of them expresses romantic wishes. Bilodeau is tonal, melodic, but sometimes full of surprises as far as the harmonies he employs. Philippe Sly’s presence is subtle at first, emerging gradually in the second act as he has greater moments of passion. Kirsten MacKinnon as Christine is at the centre of the opera but often softly observing, not always given the opportunity to comment on the drama her life has inspired: which ends up being a good choice by Bilodeau and Bouchard, a story swirling around her until finally she begins to emerge in response to the pressures placed on her. Countess Ebba Sparre (sung by Queen Hezumuryango) also is given her clearest opportunities to show us who she is towards the end.

Christine (Kirsten MacKinnon) and Countess Ebba Sparre (Queen Hezumuryango, photo: Michael Cooper)

The co-pro with Opéra de Montréal looks and sounds magnificent. Johannes Debus gets a stunning sound from the COC Orchestra and chorus, who are for the second show this season often singing sweetly in support as a wordless chorus (recalling their lovely sound in the humming chorus in Butterfly).

New opera doesn’t have to be atonal or dissonant. Bilodeau’s lovely sound world captures the passions and depths of Bouchard’s clever writing for La Reine-Garçon, more performances upcoming February 5, 7, 9, 13 and 15. I’m seeing it again, and recommend you do so too.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Varieties of virtuosity: an interview with Piano Lunaire founder Adam Sherkin

Last month I was delighted to discover Adam Sherkin at a free noon-hour concert in the Richard Bradshaw Amphitheatre, a brilliant pianist & composer I probably should have heard sooner and founder of Piano Lunaire.

Adam Sherkin of Piano Lunaire

I jumped at the chance to hear his concert as an opportunity to explore Julien Bilodeau’s La Reine-Garçon through a series of piano paraphrases based on his opera. I am a bit obsessive about such music both as a listener and as a pianist even if these virtuoso pieces are sometimes beyond my abilities. I wanted to know more, so I had to interview Adam.

*****

Barczablog: Are you more like your father or mother?

Adam Sherkin: Artistically speaking, I am more like my mother. She is a painter and poet and has worked in the visual arts her entire life. I grew up adjacent to her practice and would frequently visit her studio. She is also an author of children’s books on colour, form and shape, encouraging young minds to appreciate our world in multi-color and contrasting spectra, not just in black and white. 

My father – a successful entrepreneur and corporate professional trained as an industrial engineer – has ever been supportive and understanding of the so-called “artistic life,” firstly supporting my mother’s pursuits when they married and then in turn, his son’s (ie, moi). In fact my entire family has been overwhelmingly supportive of my musical practice. We grew up, more or less, in an artistic household. (I have a sister who is a talented photographer and musician, amongst other impressive skills including pottery, darning and wood-working).

Both of my parents knew something about playing music: my father used to bring out his clarinet on occasion and even was a stand partner in high school with Hollywood’s famed composer, Howard Shore. My mother’s father was a pianist with a gifted ear and might have gone further had he not turned his sights to the Canadian Armed Forces in the 1930’s. He would often listen to me play in his senior years and heartily encourage my piano practice when I was an adolescent. He has a knack for Sergei Rachmaninoff and Duke Ellington, often commingling the two at the keyboard in a single (somewhat improvisatory) sitting.

BB: What is the best or worst thing about what you do?

Adam Sherkin: I suppose like many freelance artists and many professionals for that matter, part of my days are spent on tasks I don’t particularly find engaging nor creatively nourishing. Gone are the days when a pianist/composer could simply devote the entire work day to their art and trust others to manage one’s career. While a handful of artists still enjoy this existence in the 21st century, I do not have such luxuries. I constantly hanker for more creative time: both at the piano and with my manuscript paper (I still try to compose by hand!) Nevertheless, the power of our digital media platforms cannot be undervalued and indeed, much of my success and the development of my career betrays a great debt to digital media and the power of networking both on and off the screen. It is still most important to get out and be a living, breathing part of one’s musical community. While the Covid-19 Pandemic has upended that practice and changed our comfort levels of interaction, I still favour real-life connections in a professional ecosystem. Fortunately, I have always been a social creature and this part of the job comes easy to me.

The best thing about what I do? Striving for that ol’ cosmic connection of course. Sure, the business side of Piano Lunaire has been truly rewarding and our commissioning work and outreach is something I’m eminently proud of. But the heart of the matter, the real deal, is to connect with other humans in timeThat is ever the goal: to reach an audience in new ways and to urge them, compel them, grip them in the time continuum of dialogue and expression. Our great task – (and one we rarely achieve) – is to move our audience through the medium we wield and move in. At its highest of callings, we are tasked on stage to transform our audience and in some way change them – their humanity – for the better. That’s the name of this relentless game. It’s a calling, a purpose, a dedication or great folly. But as I am about half-way though my life now, there’s no going back. I have been a devoted musician since the age of twelve and a musician I shall be until the end, (this go-around anyway.)

One thing is steadfastly true: there remains no better place I know in this realm of existence than being on stage, at a fine great piano, with a full house and with a masterwork to play for them.

BB: Who do you like to listen to or watch?

Adam Sherkin: When I was younger I had a more eclectic palette but there’s just too much darn good music under the sun. So, these days, I listen/watch traditional and new classical music almost all of the time. On a good day, I will sit down with a (new) score and listen to a work I do not know. This is a special kind of active listening, highly advisable for composers. It instills new ideas and often inspires one to keep writing their own work. One of my teachers at the Royal College of Music in London, David Sawer, adopted this daily practice and it’s a good one. I also enjoy decent films and have a soft spot for old comedy shows of the British variety: Keeping Up Appearances and Two Fat Ladies* are (not so) guilty pleasures.

*The delights and merit of these two unexpectedly hilarious celebrity cooks must n’ere be underestimated! (May they rest in peace.)

Occasionally, I’ll attend a jazz set and have recently become more compelled to hear organ music. Living in New York (and a stone’s throw away from the Metropolitan Opera), I have endeavored to make more space in my life for opera, though I prefer the contemporary ones or at least those written in the last 100 years.

Hands-down, my five favourite composers have long been: Haydn, Fauré, Copland, Claude Vivier and John Adams.

BB: What ability or skill do you wish you had, that you don’t have?

Adam Sherkin: I wish I could have the sort of scientific mind that can think fluently with advanced mathematics and more specifically, a mind that creates and invents in the sphere of cosmology and theoretical physics.

BB: When you’re just relaxing and not working, what is your favourite thing to do?

Adam Sherkin: Spend a day exploring the city; a picnic in the park with a book or hosting an intimate dinner party.

BB: What was your first experience of music ?

Adam Sherkin: While my first musical experience was performing Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer at a Christmas recital aged 6, my first important musical experience was at the age of twelve: I heard Emmanuel Ax perform Mozart’s 22nd piano concerto, K. 482 with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra under the baton of Jukka-Pekka Saraste. After hearing such sublime collaboration and the artistry of Ax doing, well, just the kind of thing that Ax does best, I was hooked; It was on that night that I decided to become a musician.

BB: What is your favourite melody / piece of music?

Adam Sherkin: Ach! Nearly impossible to choose. How about this:

First light:  any Domenico Scarlatti sonata in D major

Midday: something lyrical and andante-ish by Aaron Copland OR: the first movement of Century Rolls by John Adams

Day’s close: a late nocturne by Gabriel Faure

BB: Are there any well-known transcriptions by classical composers (Rachmaninoff, Liszt, Busoni ) that you enjoy playing…?

Adam Sherkin: When I was a teenager, one of my teachers, Boris Lysenko, revealed himself to be a crazed fan of Liszt operatic paraphrases. Specifically, he loved the Mozart transcriptions and performed the Don Giovanni paraphrase (aka Réminiscences de Don Juan, S. 418) often in his own career. He urged me to find a less familiar Figaro-Giavanni transcription, hard to come by in those days. It was left unfinished (semi-improvised?) by Liszt, S.697 and was – and is – fiendishly difficult. It paraphrases two operas: The Marriage of Figaro and Don Giovanni. I got a hold of a score completed by Leslie Howard, the great Australian Liszt specialist, and to this day I still can’t really play it. Perhaps I’ll dig it out one summer and honour Boris Lysenko’s memory, learning it properly.

Amongst the more reasonable bag of paraphrasiastic tricks is Liszt’s Ballade from The Flying Dutchman (after Wagner) which I enjoy performing. Another memorable piece in my repertoire is the Liszt transcription from Wagner’s Parsifal, “Solemn March to the Holy Grail. (My performance of it, live)”. I had the good fortune to play this work on a Steingraeber piano for Udo Steingraeber, honouring his visit from Bayreuth to Toronto and the 200th anniversary of Richard Wagner’s birth: May 22nd, 2013. It was Steingraeber & Söhne who built the Parsifal bells for Wagner in 1882, as included in the opera at Bayreuth.

A comparable piece to the march is Busoni’s Funeral March for Siegfried’s Death from Wagner’s “Götterdämmerung.” I also have enjoyed performing paraphrases by Rachmaninoff as well. While not technically paraphrasing operas, Rachmaninoff’s works from his later years are superb and I have played them often:Paraphrase of Mendelssohn: Scherzo from the Incidental music to Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1933) and; Paraphrase of Tchaikovsky: Lullaby (Cradle Song Op.16, No.1).

Moving forward to our own time, Thomas Adès has revived the genre somewhat with dazzling paraphrases on his own operas. Perhaps the most famous of these is the Concert Paraphrase on Powder Her Face, taken from his first and highly acclaimed opera. To his catalogue, he has added various pieces from The Tempest and The Exterminating Angel. The dark and beautiful Berceuse from The Exterminating Angel is included on my recital programme in Montreal this month, featuring Bildoeau’s complete paraphrases on La Reine-Garcon and selections from my own solo piano cycle, Northern Frames.

Perhaps one fine day, when I finish my own first opera, I’ll have the chance to write and perform (my very own) operatic paraphrases!

BB: do you have any ideas about reforming / modernizing classical music culture to better align with modern audiences.

Adam Sherkin: Too many to recount here. It’s an involved discussion and an ever evolving set of ideas. It’s been the focus of my presentation. since I left college in London in 2008. In brief: don’t underestimate your audience (ie. Challenging them is good). The venue lights shouldn’t be too bright, the program not too long, the bar should remain open throughout and the atmosphere must have a buzz. The slicker the venue, the more modern the feel. Intermission needs to come after one hour of music AT MOST and the ticket prices need to be reasonable. Don’t bore your audience and don’t ever, ever take them for granted. Put yourself in their shoes from first to last experience, including ticket purchase, arrival at venue and final round of applause.

BB: You are both a pianist and a composer .  Talk a bit about your background training, and how you got here. 

Adam Sherkin: My training began at the keyboard. I was fortunate enough to have excellent piano teachers all along the way, beginning with Claire Hoeffler at her studio in High Park. I entered the Glenn Gould School academy training program when I was 16 and thereafter the university level courses at age 19. My years at GGS were formative and I learned a great deal from the teachers and masterclasses. Leon Fleisher, Marc Durand, Boris Lysenko, Andre Laplante and John Perry: what a roster! The conservatory atmosphere was ideal to focus on musical development and the small student population forged great camaraderie.

In my second year, I performed Messiaen’s piano concerto, Couleurs de la cité celeste, with the orchestra, under the baton of Alain Trudel. This really turned me onto contemporary music. That same year, I also began to compose in earnest. Jack Behrens, who was Dean of Academic Studies at the time, (and who passed away in December of 2024), was especially generous in his encouragement of my compositorial abilities. After the creation of some early pieces I took a year off in between bachelor and master degrees and worked up a compositional portfolio. Jack was very supportive of my studies in this field and so I applied to attend a master’s program in composition with a minor in piano performance, (as opposed to the other way around!) I settled on the Royal College of Music, London and figuratively set sail for the Old World.

In London, the opportunities seemed limitless. I had excellent training there as a composer (much needed by this point) and I was fortunate to study performance with pianist Andrew Ball, a specialist in new music. It was in London that I found my pianist/composer profile and upon graduation, embarked on a career in both disciplines.

After three years and some performances and composition work in London, I returned to Canada. Freelancing in Toronto started immediately and I also worked at the Royal Conservatory and helped out in the New Music Ensemble there, under Brian Current. After nearly a decade in Toronto and multiple seasons of solo recitals, premieres, chamber music and vocal coaching, I decided it was time for something new.

I applied for the professional studies program at Mannes College in New York and mentored there with composer Lowell Liebermann in Fall of 2019. Through the pandemic I remained in Canada but finally completed my studies at Mannes by Spring of 2022. Since then I have made my home in both New York and Toronto and brought the production company and record label, Piano Lunaire, to the USA.

I have been fortunate, as a Canadian, to have worked and studied in these three locations: London, Toronto and New York. It is important, even today, for Canadian artists to gain such wider perspectives, if providence and luck allows. Spending time in both Britain and America respectively have taught me more about my relationship to Canada and this country’s (still very young) musical lineage.

BB: You’re performing the six paraphrases based on Julien Bilodeau’s opera, La Reine-garçon. Please give me a synopsis of how you understand  the six pieces: the story / idea that the composer is trying to tell us in each piece. 

Adam Sherkin: Originally, Julien and I conceived of one paraphrase containing various sections. That vision quickly augmented into three paraphrases and before we knew it, Julien had produced SIX! He seems to believe it vital to include each of these complementary profiles (pieces) to give a full overview – a condensed form – of the opera. Interestingly, the paraphrases evolved as a kind of character suite, highlighting the major roles and the various dramatic junctures that occur throughout the narrative of La Reine-Garcon. While this is not a literal transcription, musically speaking, Julien has distilled the essential aspects of each character and offers tableaus that can one enjoyed irrespectively of the operatic experience.

Composer Julien Bilodeau and pianist Adam Sherkin

The six paraphrases, in chronological order, are entitled: “Butor,” “Faraud,” “Courroux,” “Fleur de peau,” “Cogito” and “Libre arbitre.” Generally speaking, these pieces are fast and virtuosic: highly demanding and technical. But within the virtuoso textures, varying expressions emerge and intersect. The character profile of each is palpable.

Julien describes this process in his composer’s note to the score:

The Paraphrases reveal many thematic aspects of the opera: Christine’s struggle (the queen of Sweden), the characters surrounding her, (Descartes, her two suitors – Gustav and Johan – her irascible mother) and her quest for free will. Each of the pieces, lasting approximately five minutes, develop the musical materials of the opera at the solo piano. Through these six paraphrases, the listener is transported on a condensed journey, relating the highlights of the opera, while being able to appreciate pianistic writing that is both virtuoso and poetic.”

BB: Thinking again of the six paraphrases, did any of these scare you or give you trouble when you first played them?

Adam Sherkin: There were some initial discussions for revision. Julien produced a first draft in August and we met in Montreal in mid September (2024). Over two intense days of workshopping, we played through the entirety of the score and revised certain passages, clarified notation and adjusted pedaling. Julien has been particularly fond of the sostenuto (middle) pedal in this work so we spent quite a lot of time on performance logistics related to the sostenuto pedal. He also has a predilection for wide intervals: 9ths and 10ths. While I can span particular 10ths, not all are manageable for me. In the hands of another pianist with a larger span, these passages might be doable but at least for our immediate purposes, 10ths were generally rewritten as octaves. 

Through the next working phase this past Fall, as these six paraphrases came up to performance level, some of the tempi proved too quick to realize at the piano (the orchestra can sometimes play faster than keyboards!) So Julien has been most gracious in reducing the speed of the metronome markings; this also can depend on the venue and specific acoustics (ie. reverb, dryness, immediacy of sound, etc.)

BB: how difficult are these paraphrases for the pianist to play? 

Adam Sherkin: In many respects, these paraphrases are on par with those works of the same genre by Liszt, Rachmaninoff and Busoni. Julien does not hold back in his demands on the pianist, writing multiple textures and constant barrage of notes and episodic changes. The trick here is to make the music sound easy and always within the performer’s control, all the while being technically demanding, requiring extra stamina. 

These paraphrases are indeed on the order of virtuoso pianism. That’s why we have themed the tour, “Paraphrases for a New World.”  Julien and I will continue to make adjustments and find more efficiencies in realization here as we premiere and eventually record this music, but they nonetheless remain difficult pieces for almost any pianist who opts to tackle them.

BB: It was great to see you and Julien Bilodeau sharing the RBA stage for the concert January 23rd, collaborating and discussion working together. How did you meet and how did you begin to collaborate?

Adam Sherkin: I was familiar with some of Julien’s work through Nouvel Ensemble Moderne and my time attending a workshop in Montreal with the Bozzini Quartet. Colleague and friend, pianist Matthew Fortin had premiered Julien’s piano concerto in 2012 (with much success) so when COC announced their 2024-25 season last Spring in Toronto, I approached Julien straight away and suggested a collaboration for the RBA Free Concert Series, analogous to the opening week of La Reine-Garcon. Both he and the staff at COC proved receptive to the idea and we began to make plans and source funding for a new commission (Six Paraphrases) and the revision of Julien’s existing piano music (Quatre Etudes).

BB: When you’re playing a piano piece based on an orchestral work as you do with paraphrases based on operatic composition, how do you imagine yourself reconciling the two extremes, between aiming to channel the orchestra’s sound vs playing the piece as written. 

Adam Sherkin: I do not conceive this as a challenging of two extremes, rather I perceive orchestral tonal palettes informing the work in this instance even more than usual. We often hear talk of colour and orchestration in piano pedagogy, regardless of whether the music in question exists in a symphonic or other comparable form but I think there is a starting point here with a full orchestral score-to-keyboard (ie. clarinet solo or percussion sonorities). The next important step is for the pianist to evoke that orchestral sonic vision and expand it, offering conviction from the keyboard’s special vantage point. This remains a significant aspect in crafting (and performing!) a successful solo recital.

BB: In the era of the old-fashioned competitive virtuosi, when Busoni or Brahms or Rachmaninoff had their own paraphrases, they wouldn’t play those of other pianists: which is a shame. And of course maybe I’m foolish to think you listen to a contemporary pianist. But could you comment as to whether we could ever hear for example Stewart Goodyear play your transcriptions or vice versa (you playing his)? I think it would be wonderful. 

Adam Sherkin: This raises an interesting point. In principle, I am an advocate for my community, colleagues and, well, direct competitors. I believe that when one of us excels, we all can, especially in Canada and specifically, Toronto. We must nurture one another and support a healthy ecosystem of music-making, idea-sharing and commissioning of those composers we believe in and respond personally to.

An American colleague and fine pianist in New York, Konstantin Soukhovetski, has a particular knack for skilled transcriptions and has written some very beautiful examples; I have plans to perform some of them soon. On March 15th of this year, at NYC’s Merkin Concert Hall, Anthony de Mare and I will perform a duo piano programme that includes four opera transcriptions by Canadian composer Rodney Sharman. 

Now, I admit that I am unfamiliar with Stewart Goodyear’s Nutcracker transcription (as many excellent such essays of the ballet already exist for keyboard) but I am keen to change that and hear them. Stewart Goodyear is an excellent example of a pianist-composer who challenges himself and his audiences to expand their notion of the 21st century virtuoso. Perhaps I can ask him for the score of his Nutcracker transcription and in turn, offer Bilodeau’s paraphrases on La Reine-Garcon

Since Piano Lunaire and I helped to commission Bilodeau’s new music, we have exclusivity for a few years now but once that time is up, I would be thrilled if other pianists wish to take up these new operatic transcriptions. This is a novel and topical contribution to the Canadian keyboard repertory.

BB I want to ask you about your own compositions. I saw that you composed four piano sonatas, written over a span of fifteen years: 2008 to 2024. Tell me more.

Adam Sherkin: I was lucky enough to present a quasi-retrospective recital in September in New York: all four of my solo piano sonatas. Rarely do I have an opportunity to play an entire performance featuring only my own work. I presented these pieces in chronological order and discussed each one, offering a context for their conception, autobiographical details and their evolving performance and recording practice. The fourth and final sonata to-date (2024) included a part for toy piano.

The first sonata, “Sunderance” was recorded on my debut album in 2012, As At First. Sonatas nos. 2 and 3: “Cŵn Annwn” and Ended in Ice” respectively will be included on my next solo album, to be released in late Fall 2025, Open Myths.

BB: It was an unexpected thrill to hear the way you play the Mozart K 311 on Youtube (my favourite of all the Mozart sonatas), especially your willingness to elaborate / depart from the score as written, creating something fresh & new.

I’m certain Mozart would approve, as surely what you’re doing was normal in his time.  Should we expect any other classical works in the future of Piano Lunaire? 

Adam Sherkin: I am so very pleased to hear that, thank-you. I used to present a lunchtime series at the St Lawrence Centre a few years back (2013 through 2018) that took place on the first Thursday of every month, themed Write Off the Keyboard. I enjoyed these recitals immensely. They offered an opportunity to work on traditional repertoire by composer-pianists from our not-too-distant past: Scarlatti, Haydn, Beethoven, Chopin and Liszt of course; Brahms, Granados and yes, MOZART! I’ve always adored Mozart’s keyboard music and therefore relished the opportunity to present it alongside contemporary works. Much new music exists from our own time that either pays homage to the famed Viennese composer or takes inspiration from his catalogue and uses existing (original) materials. 

But of that particular compositional school, my first love has been the piano works of Franz Joseph Haydn. I have always felt free and spontaneous amongst the (fifty-plus!) sonatas of Haydn and always experiment and embellish, ornament and invent. This proclivity likely shows itself in my Mozart interpretation also as I revel too in finding new and unexpected ways to infuse Mozart’s well-worn keyboard music with a sense of discovery, adventure and a healthy dose of joviality. (The recitals on the Write Off the Keyboard series that features Mozart’s works were entitled “MOZART: Involuntary Genius.”)

BB: Yes! K311 often sounds like laughter, and you bring that out beautifully.

Adam Sherkin:As for Piano Lunaire’s Mozartian programming prospects, they remain slight as we tend to favour Haydn. Just this past summer in both New York and Toronto, we piloted the “High Summer Haydn” festival, offered on midweek evenings at a pay-what-you-wish price point. With a later start time of 9:00 pm and an open bar, these summer concerts were rather successful. The focus was, naturally, on Haydn’s piano music and included highlights from his minor-keyed sonatas, works the maestro wrote in London on his trips there in the 1790’s and keyboard music written expressly for Prince Esterhazy II. We even brought a fun and quirky set of Haydn’s Scottish (!) folk song arrangements to Toronto’s Arts & Letters Club in September, featuring mezzo-soprano Chantelle Grant and TSO violist, Ivan Ivanovich. Currently, we are in the midst of planning for this coming summer at Piano Lunaire and will have more of Haydn’s irresistible inventions to reveal, with concert dates – soon!

Existing live recordings from the festival will be available on our YouTube page. An exciting part of this year’s festival includes small commissions from emerging composers that form companion pieces to Haydn’s keyboard sonata catalogue.

BB: Do you ever feel conflicted, reconciling the business side and the art?

Adam Sherkin: I used to feel more conflicted as a young person but I have developed these skill sets apace as I move through my career. I suppose I am young enough to have been taught about making your own way and not always relying on others to manage you. Moreover, the resources young artists have at their disposal today are impressive, overwhelming even. Despite my familiarity with the demands and the hustle, I often never feel like there is enough time for my art, a sad admission to make. Our world’s technological compulsions don’t help this, as there is ever a reason to be pulled away from the analogue and into the digital: endless emails that replying to, messages, posts, texts, promotional requests, listings, coordinations, banking, contracts, travel bookings, collegial discussions, Zoom meetings, on and on ad infinitum. 

However, many successful artists navigate these fatiguing waters each day and enjoy wildly successful careers so, there is hope and there is a way forward!* It was firebrand, soprano Barbara Hannigan (ever an inspiration to me, not to mention a Canadian national treasure) who I first heard openly share her experiences around finding such balance. She continues to struggle with it but has achieved incredible success in her career and always engages – enthralls – her public. Through her integrity, devotion to the craft and ultimately humane approach to her business obligations, she provides us in this kooky industry a shining example of what is possible. We can both thrive at the business side and soar at the artistic, all in a single day. 

* This reminds me suddenly of Sergei Rachmannoff, who after first visiting America in 1909 on a concert tour in that “accursed country,” complained of the inordinate emphasis on, “the business, the business…they are forever doing, clutching you from all sides and driving you on… I am very busy and very tired.” (From a letter to his cousin, Zoya Pribitkova.)

BB: Could we talk about virtuosity?  When we think of Bob Dylan or KD Lang reconciling sincerity & skill, nobody insists that they hit high notes or play difficult riffs on their instruments, so long as there’s a connection.  As artists are we trained animals showing off? Debussy and Wagner both spoke of the virtuoso as a kind of circus animal, and the applause as a kind of trap.  I wonder what you’d say, as a performer who likely enjoys applause, especially given that you’re working as a virtuoso pianist, where I’m asking about virtuosity as though that were somehow measurable… Does this influence the way you write and how you perform? 

Adam Sherkin: Hopefully, all performers enjoy applause! And equally, all audiences enjoy real pyrotechnics and feats of virtuosity. But this cannot be all a performer offers to their audience, especially not when that performer eventually grows up (ie. post 21 years old)

Virtuosity and technical prowess does influence the way I write, at the piano and off it. I believe that it is necessary to energize and incite our listeners. Sure, we can mutter, whisper, play quietly, slowly and poetically but this is a permission we need to earn on stage. Similar to how actors must earn their silences, musicians must gain the trust of audiences by showing them we can do almost anything: the journey we endeavour to take them on will be stimulating, nourishing, worthy and perhaps even surprising. We engage in a bond of confidence with our listeners, proclaiming we somehow know what we’re doing, that we can do the thing exceedingly well. They will get their money’s worth. If they trust us and we first prove that they can extend this trust, they just might leave our keyboard side elevated, inspired and forever changed.

BB: Since the pandemic a great many ways artists are working virtually, both as teachers and as performers. Do you have a preference between live or recorded performance and when you record how do you make it seem live?

Adam Sherkin: I have always enjoyed both live and recorded performance. During the pandemic, Piano Lunaire originated a digital performance platform, as did many organizations: LUNAIRE LIVE offered as close an experience to live performance as was safe during that period. But something was always missing when playing in an empty room with recording crew and myself alone, it could never replicate a true concert experience. On one occasion during a live stream, a fellow composer came to the outside of my living room, near to the piano, so we could open a window and she could hear her work played – such times! At any rate, the eventual return to live performance was warmly welcomed in my corner.

I tend to believe that truly fine recordings are an art form unto themselves. The medium of the proverbial long-playing record is to be cherished and celebrated, exactly for what it is. There are magics begotten in the recording studio, just as there are in a live concert hall.

BB: If you could tell the institutions how to train future artists, what would you change?

Adam Sherkin: As I don’t do a lot of teaching nor have ever held a full time position at a music institution, I might not be the most qualified to answer this. I will be ever grateful to my own teachers, many of whom have sadly passed on: Jack Behrens, Boris Lysenko, Colin Tilney, Leon Fleischer and Andrew Ball, among others.  

If I could perhaps  insist on one point though it would be this: instill a love and fearlessness in the young artists of today. Nothing is impossible and a dream-career can be yours for the taking, so long as you are prepared to seek it on your own. Our society (particularly in North America) might try and dissuade you and don’t wait for it to come find you: be brave and singular, drive out the noise and blind your sensitivities to all else that will never serve your artistic practice: this higher purpose.

*****

Paraphrases for a New World

Paraphrases on La Reine-Garçon is a collection of piano pieces based on the Opera La Reine Garçon: as this will be performed at the Canadian Opera Company in February 2025 on its main stage, Sherkin’s recital is designed to accompany its production by presenting Bilodeau’s musical style as well as providing a taste of the opera itself. The Paraphrases will reveal many thematic aspects of the opera: The struggle of Christina, Queen of Sweden, the characters surrounding her (Descartes, her two suitors – Gustav and Johan and her irascible mother) and her quest for free will. Each piece has a duration of approximately five minutes and develops the musical material of the opera for the piano. Through these six pieces, the listener will be transported on a condensed journey that recounts the highlights of the opera while being able to appreciate a pianistic writing that is both virtuosic and poetic.

January 23: 12:00-1:00pm Canadian Opera Company Free Concert (review)
February 5: 12:00-1:00pm Toronto Arts and Letter Club
February 8: 8:00-10:00pm Tenri Cultural Institute New York City
February 12: 7:30 pm – 8:45 pm Salle Paul-Desmarais du Centre canadien d’Architecture Montreal
February 20: TBA Canadian Music Center Toronto

Posted in Interviews, Music and musicology, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New COC Butterfly gets it right

Everything clicked today in the Canadian Opera Company presentation of Puccini’s Madama Butterfly at the Four Seasons Centre. I’ve been enjoying the music of this opera all my life in spite of shortcomings, never having experienced a production that was as perfect as this one.

Pinkerton (Kang Wang) and Butterfly (Eri Nakamura; photo: Michael Cooper)

The principals were superb beginning with Eri Nakamura in the challenging title role. When I think back on recordings I heard with Italian sopranos such as Albanese or Tebaldi, or COC productions starring a mature singer, we were always required to make a huge suspension of disbelief. How could it be otherwise, when the role calls for a dramatic soprano portraying a beautiful teenager. I don’t think you can improve on Nakamura’s portrayal, from the sparkling high notes in the love duet, the unshakeable resolve in her big aria “un bel di”, an unexpectedly light comic touch in her scene with Yamadori, or her brilliant handling of the horrific drama in the last act. The role is demanding, yet her voice was better as she went on, perhaps because she conserved some of her resources earlier on.

There is a certain irony in having Nakamura in this cast, given that the usual optics for the opera are missing. Casting the Asiatic Kang Wang as Pinkerton defuses some of the usual racial tension. We still have an imperialistic American sailor singing “America Forever”, who marries Cio-cio San even though he drinks a toast to the day he will eventually marry a real American wife. But at least he’s not also enacting white supremacy.

During intermission as I chatted with someone seeing Butterfly for the first time in her life (what a treat, especially when their first is such a good production), I couldn’t help thinking how relevant Puccini feels right now in addressing contemporary issues such as poverty (Boheme), tyranny (Tosca) and American imperialism (Butterfly).

It’s a delightful surprise to encounter a racially inclusive cast in an opera where race is so central to the story, but all the principals are persons of colour. The effect was unexpected. I felt Wang’s remorse in the last act was more believable than the usual Pinkerton, the relationship somehow more romantic as a result. But the main thing was how well these two portrayed their roles, singing and acting flawlessly.

The production co-commissioned by Houston Grand Opera, the Grand Théâtre de Genève and Lyric Opera of Chicago, was directed originally by Michael Grandage but in the revival by Jordan Lee Braun.

I understand that Puccini can be one of the hardest composers to conduct, using big orchestral effects resembling Wagner even while the singers require more flexibility of tempo and dynamics from the leader, controlling that huge sound. Conductor Keri-Lynn Wilson led a sensitive reading, the COC orchestra sounding superb especially at the beginning of each act. The COC Chorus was nicely blended into the whole in their offstage moments. The result was brilliantly musical in support of the story-telling.

Keri-Lynn WIlson (photo: Daria Stravs Tisu)

There were no weak spots in the cast. Hyona Kim was a standout as Suzuki, Butterfly’s servant, at times anticipating the audience’s emotions in her sympathetic responses to the plight of her mistress, and the voice wonderfully eloquent. Michael Samuel was the other empathetic figure as Sharpless, the lynchpin of the plot as he helps Butterfly. Julius Ahn was an energetic Goro, with a touch of mischief. Gene Wu was a superb Bonze including a magical moment nose to nose with Wang’s Pinkerton.

The Bonze (Gene Wu, holding the spear) denounces his niece Butterfly (Eri Nakamura), as Pinkerton observes (far left in naval uniform) among family members who hear the Bonze’s accusation of Butterfly’s betrayal of her culture
(photo: Michael Cooper)

Samuel Chan was an intriguing Yamadori, singing some of my favourite music in the opera (i always desperately wish Butterfly would accept his proposal, but sigh it never happens). Whether Yamadori is an unattractive older fellow being pushed by the opportunistic Goro or the handsome younger one we saw today, the scene serves as a light interruption in the tragic plot.

Left to right: Suzuki (Hyona Kim), Butterfly (Eri Nakamura), Yamadori (Samuel Chan) and Goro (Julius Ahn; Photo: Michael Cooper)

Madama Butterfly continues with six more performances February 1, 6, 8, 12, 14 and 16.

Left to right: Suzuki (Hyona Kim), Sorrow (Naleya Sayavong) & Butterfly (Eri Nakamura; photo: Michael Cooper)

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paraphrases on La Reine-garçon from Sherkin & Bilodeau

Today was my first time attending a noon-hour Canadian Opera Company concert in a long time, tempted by a few magic words: a world premiere performance of excerpts from a suite of paraphrases composed by Julien Bilodeau, whose opera La Reine-garçon begins its run with the COC beginning January 31st. Today’s concert was first in a series from Bilodeau.

How could I resist?

Bilodeau composed in collaboration with Piano Lunaire, an organization founded by the pianist we heard today, Adam Sherkin.

Composer and virtuoso pianist Adam Sherkin

Their website describes the paraphrases this way:

Paraphrases on La Reine-Garçon is a collection of piano pieces based on the Opera La Reine Garçon: as this will be performed at the Canadian Opera Company in February 2025 on its main stage, Sherkin’s recital is designed to accompany its production by presenting Bilodeau’s musical style as well as providing a taste of the opera itself. The Paraphrases will reveal many thematic aspects of the opera: The struggle of Christina, Queen of Sweden, the characters surrounding her (Descartes, her two suitors – Gustav and Johan and her irascible mother) and her quest for free will. Each piece has a duration of approximately five minutes and develops the musical material of the opera for the piano. Through these six pieces, the listener will be transported on a condensed journey that recounts the highlights of the opera while being able to appreciate a pianistic writing that is both virtuosic and poetic

The program for today’s recital was as follows:

Ligeti: Etude No 15
Sherkin: Etude No 1 Op 21
Bilodeau: #3 and 4 of the Quatre Etudes du printemps
Bilodeau: #2, 4, 5, 6 of the Six Paraphrases sur La Reine-garçon 

Both Bilodeau and Sherkin were generous in explaining their approach to collaboration. Bilodeau explained that the six paraphrases in the suite each tell us about a character in his opera. We heard four of them today, each distinctive in its sound.

First in the suite came #2 Faraud. I’m not sure I fully understood this one, as we were told that the character being portrayed was someone who saw themself as more competent & adept than they really were in fact. The music was playful with phrases suggesting dance, but I didn’t hear ineptitude. The funny thing is that even here the music was stylish and beautiful.

Next came #4 Fleur de peau, for an interaction between Queen Christine and another woman, when she felt something like attraction. I thought this one worked well, a series of repeated notes to suggest a trembling excitement, first high then lower as a sort of motif for the new idea, among luscious sensuous clusters of notes. It was clever, powerfully suggestive. Or maybe I have an over-active imagination.

Next came #5 Cogito, which was about Rene Descartes, who Christine invited to help understand her psychology. Of course there was no Freud in her century, so Descartes was a good idea, even if he was intent on figuring out the anatomy of faith, looking inside a cadaver for the organ connecting the mind and the spirit. I was reminded of the music Richard Strauss employed in the “Of Science” segment of Also sprach Zarathustra, a complex music to suggest mental complexity and over-thinking. But in time the music settles into something calmer, quite beautiful.

We moved into the last segment without pause 6 Libre arbitre. This was the most fervent and passionate of the pieces, reminding me of Schumann’s closing section of his Scenes from childhood titled “the poet speaks” or the finale of Ravel’s Mother Goose. All four of the paraphrases make me eager to hear the opera, gorgeous music full of drama and emotion.

I am reminded of a famous quote from painter Maurice Denis who said “Remember that a painting—before it is a battle horse, a nude model, or some anecdote—is essentially a flat surface covered with colors assembled in a certain order.” This is important when we recall that pieces of piano music that might tell a story or remind us of a picture or character, are first and foremost a series of notes on the page, a piano composition to challenge the pianist. I bring it up because whatever the relationship between the piano paraphrases and the opera, we heard some gorgeous playing from Sherkin, especially in the paraphrases. We heard a virtuoso playing effortlessly in front of us on the Steinway.

In a friendly chat with the composer afterwards, he remarked that this isn’t quite the usual we know from the paraphrase tradition. We know of a history of virtuoso compositions with a few usual objectives.

  1. to show off the pianist’s abilities
  2. to show us the music being paraphrased in a different light
  3. to promote the composer being paraphrased

Franz Liszt was one of the first composers making concert paraphrases of everything from Schubert songs to operatic quartets from Verdi. I’m a big fan as a listener and as a player even if I can’t always manage the pieces, which are a wonderful challenge and a new lens through which to see the original piece.

Bilodeau admitted, however, that his paraphrases were a bit different from what we’d seen before. The usual paraphrase (if we can speak of such a thing when the traditional type happened long ago) would take a familiar piece such as a Schubert song and then turn it into something quite new. Yes we would recognize the melody but the pianist was offered a showcase for their brilliance.

We can think of them as adaptations. Let’s recall Linda Hutcheon’s observation that the pleasures of an adaptation lie in the layers through which we perceive the original. If we don’t know the new Bilodeau opera, if we have not heard it yet, the paraphrase hits us in a different way than if we’re hearing a paraphrase of a well-known melody, because we could not distinguish the new from the old, as it’s all new to us.

But there’s also another way that such a composition works, as Liszt showed in his time. Before we had recordings, the pianist brought unknown music to the world that otherwise would have been ignored, thereby publicizing and popularizing music that had not yet been heard, such as the music of Berlioz or Wagner.

We had an impressive display of pianism, with more to come. Piano Lunaire will be offering this program (with a few extras in some of the venues) a few more times in Toronto, Montreal & New York.

February 5 — 12:00 pm. Toronto Arts and Letters Club, Toronto
February 8 — 8:00 pm Tenri Cultural Institute – New York City
February 12–7:30pm Montreal
February 20–TBA Canadian Music Center – Toronto

Further information can be found on Piano Lunaire’s website.

And of course we also have Bilodeau’s opera coming to the COC January 31st until February 15.

Adam Sherkin and Julien Bilodeau

Posted in Music and musicology, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Auspicious beginning to (unofficial) TSO Beethoven festival

This week the Toronto Symphony offer the first in a series of concerts featuring the music of Ludwig van Beethoven, one of the most popular and best loved of all classical composers. Wednesday night’s performances were a brilliant start.

I took this selfie five years ago in NY. Is he the most popular of all the classical composers?

No it’s not really a festival, even if it feels like it to this admirer. I’m just calling attention to their programming because it’s exciting to get to hear so many of Beethoven’s best-known works over a relatively short period of time. Maybe the TSO programmers did it consciously? maybe not. Let me quickly summarize what’s to come, and you judge for yourself whether I’m wrong to point out the high number of Beethoven works we’re about to get. I can’t help being excited looking at this list.

  1. This week: Beethoven’s Violin Concerto (plus Schumann’s Symphony #2 and Unsuk Chin’s subito con forza, a brief modern homage to Beethoven last played by the TSO in October 2022), to be repeated Thursday January 23rd.
  2. February 5 & 6: Jan Lisiecki plays and conducts all five of the piano concerti on two consecutive nights: quite a feat from Mr Lisiecki!
  3. February 15: The Toronto Symphony Youth Orchestra get into the act with Beethoven’s 5th symphony alongside John Williams music from Star Wars and Kevin Lau’s Artemis.
  4. March 23: Beethoven Lives Upstairs is offered twice, a Young People’s Concert that also includes a Beethoven performance by Brampton’s Youth Orchestra the Rosebuds in the North Lobby.
  5. May 16: Beethoven’s 5th, this time from the National Arts Centre Orchestra. Maybe the TSO asked the NAC to play Beethoven?
  6. May 28, 30 & 31: Beethoven’s 3rd symphony Eroica, plus Arvo Pärt’s Cantus in Memoriam Benjamin Britten and Stewart Goodyear’s Callaloo—A Caribbean Suite for Piano and Orchestra
Spotlight Artist Jan Lisiecki’s virtuosic journey on Feb 5 & 6 takes us through all of Beethoven’s piano concerti, which he both plays and leads.

And so: there’s lots to hear whether Beethoven is new to you or your oldest vice. This week as I continue to ponder the recent passing of my mother at 103, I was looking at the oldest records in the family collection, my father’s old vinyl recordings, including the Toscanini set of symphonies and the Emperor aka concerto #5 played by Arthur Rubenstein, my first exposure to Beethoven. Whatever else you do raising your children, expose them to Beethoven.

But that reminds me. Yes I saw and heard a concert Wednesday night including the Beethoven violin concerto. While I grew up listening to the Mendelssohn concerto on another of my father’s vinyl discs, I recall the abrupt shift when I first heard the Beethoven concerto, one that for me stands alone above all others, possibly because it’s one of his greatest creations. I don’t think of it as a virtuoso piece so much as a brilliant composition that happens to be a violin concerto, one of the pieces where fundamental issues of sound are being explored. Again we must marvel at the creativity of a composer on the pathway to deafness exploring sonic attributes that he must have heard in his head if not in the real world.

Conductor and violinist Nikolaj Szeps-Znaider (photo: Lars Gundersen)

Nikolaj Szeps-Znaider, who has been music director of the Orchestre National de Lyon since 2021, was both the TSO’s conductor and violin soloist in the concerto.  We must somehow get this brilliant artist back for another concert as soon as possible. His conducting, his playing, his artistry are remarkable. And actually he is back (as he is still here in Toronto) , for Thursday night January 23rd, so that’s the next chance to hear him repeat this program both as a soloist and as a conductor. My head is still pulsing with the music I heard tonight.

Znaider’s violin is part of the magic, an instrument once played by Fritz Kreisler, as he told us when he offered that composer’s Liebesleid as a stunning encore accompanied by the TSO. I shouted myself a little hoarse not truly in hopes of an encore, but simply overcome, tearful, listening to the Beethoven concerto.

Does it matter if the violin’s tone is sweet, that the violinist shapes phrases exquisitely? That’s the ideal. I love this concerto but heve never heard it like this, often played with great delicacy, restraint while letting the orchestra command the conversation: as so often happens in this unique concerto. I was a bit dumbfounded as to how the orchestra stayed with him, when he slowed, when he hesitated without a clear signal (he was busy playing after all), yet they knew to follow. I suppose that’s what rehearsal is for. But OMG this was stunning.

The first movement is epic in scope, as the timpanist begins almost inaudibly with a motif that we will hear throughout the movement, simply a pattern of five repeated notes. From this the first melody opens up passionately, sometimes in winds sometimes in strings, and in due course carried by the soloist himself. After so much drama, the second movement offers us a peaceful resting place, before the catharsis of the third movement. It’s brilliantly constructed, so that we gradually go from something more like an internal struggle to something extroverted, like a celebration in its dance rhythm.

I’m reminded of Anton Kuerti’s program notes in his complete sonatas recording when he said that to play Beethoven in a sense you have to become Beethoven, your identification a natural way to read the music. If we accept that idea –which I find very compelling–it makes even more sense to have a concerto that is also conducted by the soloist as we saw tonight. and we will have that opportunity again next month when Jan Lisiecki gives us all 5 piano concerti as player and leader of the orchestra on consecutive nights. The unity between Znaider’s violin and the orchestra was unmistakeable, as though they were reading minds: although I think this was as much about visceral feeling as intellect.

And it helps that Znaider’s violin has the most beautiful violin sound I have heard in a long time, perhaps ever.

After the intermission we heard a short piece that the TSO played in October 2022 namely Unsuk Chin’s subito con forza, a brief modern homage to Beethoven. We were now listening to Znaider the conductor, as he worked without a baton giving us something substantially different from what we heard last time. At that time I enjoyed what Chin had created even though her piece seemed somewhat incoherent, a series of effects. Znaider did something to subito con forza that we would also see him do with the concluding Schumann symphony. He looked at the score, decided on a prevailing effect and then organized the players around that effect, making the work seem more coherent. The effect borders on the miraculous, as he analyzed and then shaped the interpretation for desired impact in specific places. I suppose that’s what an interpreter does?

I use that word “miraculous” because of what I heard in the TSO performance of Schumann’s symphony #2. Znaider worked without either score or baton, conducting from memory. Presumably the program was one he asked to conduct, a fascinating combination of pieces. This symphony has a lot in common with that violin concerto, another work full of passionate appoggiatura moments, when we are suspended and teased by the composer’s tendency to leave us almost resolved and then hanging a note away for a moment or two. The impact is something resembling passion, emotions that feel unfulfilled.

Znaider led a very clean clear reading unlike any performance of the work I have ever heard. The thing about the Schumann second symphony is how difficult it is to really make it work as well as what we heard tonight. There are many notes, many voices, sometimes overlapping: unless you insist that the players observe careful phrasing and get off their notes judiciously, precisely, carefully. OMG that’s what I heard tonight, a revelation in a work I thought I knew. In several places the strings were playing very softly, the trumpet motif that can sometimes overwhelm the rest of the orchestra was held in check, blended rather than blasting. As with the short work, Znaider seemed to have clear ideas, an interpretation built around a series of coherent effects, when one or another section would clearly be heard while others got out of the way, or delicately answered: but without covering one another. To make Schumann sound so sane is quite a feat.

Znaider and the TSO will repeat the program Thursday January 23rd at 8:00 at Roy Thomson Hall. Go hear it if you possibly can!

A flattering version of Beethoven that sits on my bookshelf.

Posted in Music and musicology, My mother, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wights: a fit of words against words

From its title on down, Liz Appel’s new play Wights that opened at Crow’s Theatre last night had me astonished, perplexed, wondering whether I’d seen comedy satire or just the real lives of smart people using big words in their kitchens, an intense virtuoso display from a pair of actors who left it all out there on the stage.

It’s a passionate roast, a debate to the death, but what’s dying is truth and love and hope in the final days before the 2024 American election. As Appel located her story so precisely– in Connecticut among people confidently asserting Kamala’s expected victory–on Halloween night 2024 in a kind of academic never-land of activist optimism, I felt a satirical impulse in the absurdity of the behaviour we saw and heard.

We meet the first three of our four characters, engaged in friendly conversation surrounding Anita, who hosts her two guests on the night before an interview for a job that would change her life and validate her political beliefs. Celine and Bing are helping Anita prepare to be interviewed by Yale’s “Centre for Reparative Thought and Justice,” a fiction that’s a nice match with that expectation of Kamala’s victory. I wasn’t laughing, given that I too had naive hopes about how November 5th would turn out. Maybe the satire was close to home.

Bing (Richard Lee) playfully speaking to Anita (Rachel Leslie) in her kitchen table. (photo: Dahlia Katz)

Before Anita gets very far in reading through her presentation, her husband Danny comes home, seemingly exhausted from a difficult day, and clumsily letting the guests plus the audience hear the disparaging way he refers to them, until he realizes that the guests are actually there, and he snaps back to a fake friendly jocularity with Bing.

left to right: Anita (Rachel Leslie), Danny (Ari Cohen) and Bing (Richard Lee, photo: Dahlia Katz)

In due course hungry tired Danny will snack before dinner, while Anita tries to read her presentation, with Bing playing a devil’s advocate role to help her prepare. Celine is more supportive.

Anita (Rachel Leslie), Danny (Ari Cohen), Bing (Richard Lee) and Celine (Sochi Fried, photo: Dahlia Katz)

The masks they wear in polite social conversation gradually slip as their exchanges push closer and closer to truths underlying their lives. As each guest reveals their darker core beliefs, a polite dinner is impossible, as Bing & Celine rush off.

Without the moderating effect of the guests Danny and Anita go that much deeper in their exchanges. Their fantasy of control is slipping, whether in the sounds of their child through the baby monitor signalling their failure as parents (if you think I sound harsh, you should hear how they talk about the child!), doors falling off hinges, or an accident with a corkscrew leaving Danny bleeding. While people may intend to make things happen, in the real world of Murphy’s Law people fail to understand, as things inevitably will go wrong.

We are in a discursive space where meaning is being probed and poked to the point where it snaps, and the process of communicating might have broken. If you’re waiting for a clear explanation it’s not there. I’m reminded of the way Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey challenges the viewer by resisting the easy explanation, the clear resolution. The promotional literature for Wights is bang on, when it says that it is at once enigmatic and hard-hitting, WIGHTS delves into the intricate power of language and its profound influence on our relationships, society, and the very fabric of reality. Yes. just like 2001 its ending is mysterious, poetic, elusive. But then again the world itself is a big mess right now. There’s nothing warm and fuzzy here, just like the real world. There are apocalyptic overtones in the sound design, which at times is going to make you jump, jolted in your seat. I love that, even if I’m not saying I know what it means.

As I wrestle with my impressions I’m falling back on the genre question, that can be a handy way to tell people what to expect. I heard a lot of laughter in the first half of the show, but very little towards the end. I can’t decide if I should think of Wights as satire, a comedy of manners, or a dark drama, as we are not given clear signals as to how to react. I recall how Shakespeare broke all the rules in the ways he would combine elements across genres, confounding genre expectation.

Speaking of Shakespeare he comes up in the conversation, as Danny and Anita refer to sonnet 106, including only the title while commenting on the limits to expression. No the sonnet itself isn’t in the play but I thought it might be worth having a refresher.

Sonnet 106:
When in the chronicle of wasted time
I see descriptions of the fairest wights,
And beauty making beautiful old rhyme
In praise of ladies dead and lovely knights,
Then, in the blazon of sweet beauty’s best,
Of hand, of foot, of lip, of eye, of brow,
I see their antique pen would have express’d
Even such a beauty as you master now.
So all their praises are but prophecies
Of this our time, all you prefiguring;
And, for they look’d but with divining eyes,
They had not skill enough your worth to sing:
For we, which now behold these present days,
Have eyes to wonder, but lack tongues to praise.

I wonder if Liz Appel felt any sense of futility writing a play about breakdowns in discourse. Wights is a bit of an oxymoron, so many words about failures of meaning and breakdowns in understanding. What a troubling and paradoxical site for drama.

That word “wights” in the title and the sonnet has at least two meanings, plus the third sprinkled throughout the play’s text.

Can you see the definition?

A wight is a being or creature, very much as Shakespeare used it, and was no big deal until fantasy started employing the word to suggest something supernatural or unearthly.  I think it’s the same word but simply with added connotations. If I point my magic wand at you and call you a creature, that’s not really an additional meaning, just a different context via another genre.

While I may be over-thinking in noticing a third extra meaning I hope I can be forgiven for that, in a play populated by compulsive over-thinkers. But it’s the unavoidable homonym, the accusation with the unspoken word that lurks in the relationship between Anita and Danny. While Anita is a visible minority, Danny passes as Caucasian with his white privilege and the association with white supremacy, and is tormented by guilt that inspires impulsive actions: and I won’t say more for fear of spoiling the play for you.

Sometimes people are allowed to speak at length, sometimes they are interrupted incessantly. Do people normally listen? I ask that as a question of verisimilitude, and the conventions we build into drama or film, that simply don’t apply to real life. In Appel’s play there are lots of words, the cast delivering them at break-neck speed and largely getting out of the way when a tirade begins. In my experience I don’t find that people are usually this polite, to hear someone out when they go on at such length, especially when they’re passionate or angry.

Anita (Rachel Leslie) and Danny (Ari Cohen, photo: Dahlia Katz)

As Ari Cohen is much bigger than Rachel Leslie, when he starts ranting at her in the last half hour he can compel her attention by intimidation, although (tiny spoiler alert) thank goodness he doesn’t hit her. Ah but then this is a fictional space regardless of its resemblance to modern reality. My speeches get interrupted. Angry people strike one another or walk away.

The performance came in at two and a half hours due to rapid fire delivery of huge numbers of lines from Danny and Anita. As they relax into their roles perhaps they will deliver some parts more slowly, which might be interesting to see. So yes: I want to see the play again.

A Crow’s Theatre commission directed by Crow’s Theatre Artistic Director Chris Abraham, Wights will be onstage at least until February 9th at the Guloien Theatre.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Politics, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment