Interview with William Fedkenheuer, new Artistic Director of Toronto Summer Music

William Fedkenheuer is a Canadian violinist, fiddler, and educator, second violinist for the Grammy-nominated Miró Quartet recognized internationally for chamber music and performances at prestigious venues like Carnegie Hall.

William Fedkenheuer is part of the Miró Quartet (l-r: Daniel Ching -violin, Joshua Gindele -cello, John Largess -viola)
at the 2023 Festival (Photo: Lucky Tang)

William has begun his new role as Artistic Director of Toronto Summer Music, having succeeded Jonathan Crow on September 1st. Planning for the 2026 Festival is under way.

William Fedkenheuer

A two-time Grammy nominee with the Miró Quartet, he’s also a former Canadian National Fiddle Champion.

Another side of William’s musicianship

William is also a teacher known for his diverse career blending classical mastery with Canadian folk roots.

I was delighted to be able to ask William some questions.

*******

BB: Are you more like your father or mother?
William: I carry pieces of both of my parents, though in very different ways. My mother is where my warmth, curiosity, laughter, and desire for connection come from — she’s always approached people with openness and a sense of possibility, though there is fire in the belly! My father gave me steadiness and work ethic, the ability to stay focused and build things over time, and also that quiet recharge. He loved being outdoors in the beauty and silence of nature and I bring that into my life in my own way.

And then there’s the path they didn’t take: neither of them were musicians, but they encouraged creativity. If anything, I’m a blend of their values shaped by the unexpected world that music opened up for me. They both now sing in the church choir along with my sister, Liesel, who was in the Canadian Opera Company in the early 2000’s!

What is the best or worst thing about what you do?
The best part of my work — whether performing, teaching, or directing a festival — is witnessing transformation and impacting a life. A concert that changes the room or the individual. A student discovering a new part of themselves. An ensemble growing into its artistic identity. A concert space that opens into each individual’s moment of choice.

The hardest part is the pace. The artistic world is 24/7 — travel, rehearsals, emails, programming, planning seasons years ahead. Finding balance while trying to give my full self to each role is both a joy and an ongoing negotiation and you can ask my wife, Leah, and my boys – Max and Olli, how that’s going!

Who/What do you like to listen to or watch?
I listen widely — classical, fiddle traditions, singer-songwriters, jazz. I’m as happy diving into a Beethoven quartet recording as I am listening to The Fretless, or whatever folk or roots band someone just introduced me to. Love me some Garth Brooks, Dolly, or Gordon Lightfoot! When I unwind, I lean toward shows and stories about creativity, craftsmanship, or human problem-solving — and, occasionally, a good murder mystery.

I also love silence – which may be unexpected to some. There are a lot of demands on the extrovert side of Will, and there is something so special about the stillness of silence, breath work, and meditation. One of my favourite moments in time is that split second of absolute silence right before a concert performance begins.

What ability or skill do you wish you had, that you don’t?
I wish I had a better skill for slowing down time — the ability to pause, take stock, and savor a moment just a little longer. As musicians, we spend our lives shaping time, pacing emotion, and stretching a phrase to its fullest meaning, yet life outside the concert hall moves at its own unrelenting tempo and rarely stops! I often catch myself wishing I could bring the same spaciousness, intention, and breath to the rest of my world that I strive for onstage.

When you’re just relaxing and not working, what is your favourite thing to do?
Cooking with my family and settling into long conversations around the table is one of my greatest joys. I love being outdoors, wandering through a new city with no agenda, and taking our dogs, Lola and Frizzy, out for a good walk. And honestly, ending the day watching Murder, She Wrote and eating freshly popped popcorn with my youngest son, Olli, has become one of life’s sweetest reset buttons.

What was your first experience of music?
My earliest musical memory is sitting in the living room during my sister’s violin lesson in Calgary, absorbing everything by osmosis — and constantly being distracted by the puppies that had just been born that lived there. I also loved going to the Calgary Philharmonic Pops concerts; they were pure joy for me, and I treasured my growing record collection and whatever we could find on the radio. My first teachers blended fun and focus in a way that felt magical, and that balance became the foundation of my entire musical life. Loved my Hooked on Classics albums!

What is your favourite melody / piece of music?
It’s impossible to choose just one — but Beethoven’s Cavatina from Op. 130 has been a lifelong companion, and so has the fiddling tradition I grew up with – there is nothing like the Orange Blossom Special and an audience to share it with. Those two worlds shape the way I hear everything. And truly, anything from Mozart to Drake, (dare I say Justin Bieber?), I can go old school or new,  can lodge itself in my ear and stay there for days — if it’s honest and beautifully crafted, it finds a home.

Do you have ideas about modernizing classical music culture for modern audiences?
Absolutely. At its heart, I think audiences today are looking for connection — for humanity. When we offer transparency, storytelling, interdisciplinary collaboration, diverse artistic voices, and programming that genuinely reflects the world around us, we invite people in rather than asking them to observe from a distance.

Festivals like TSM have a real opportunity to model this: bringing established and emerging artists into the same creative space, bridging genres when it deepens the experience, and treating concerts as shared moments rather than rituals of correctness. TSM already has such a close, vibrant community, and it’s an extraordinary gift to step into a role where that spirit can grow, evolve, and welcome new audiences in meaningful ways.

William Fedkenheuer

You are both a violinist and a teacher. Talk about your background training and how you got here.
My path has been shaped by extraordinary mentors and ensembles. I grew up at the Mount Royal Conservatory in Calgary, studying with Joan Barrett and Edmond Agopian, and later with Kathleen Winkler at the Shepherd School of Music at Rice University. I spent a brief but formative time at Indiana University with Miriam Fried before stepping directly into the world of string quartets — first with the Borromeo, then the Fry Street, and now the Miró Quartet.

Teaching has been woven into my life just as deeply as performing. I coached my first chamber music group as a senior in high school, and it opened a door I never closed. There is something profoundly meaningful about sharing what I’ve learned and helping others discover their own artistic voice. At The University of Texas – Austin, I teach violin, chamber music, and professional development, guiding musicians as they build lives that are both artistically rich and sustainably crafted.

Every chapter — competition wins, more than 1,700 concerts around the world, Grammy-nominated recordings, commissions and premieres — has reinforced one truth for me: artistry and education are shared lanes. They feed each other. One of the places that comes alive most vividly is in TSM’s Regeneration concerts, where mentors and fellows share the stage on Saturdays. Those moments capture exactly why I do what I do: music as craft, connection, collaboration, and community.

You have been both a fiddler and a violinist. What do those words mean to you?
As a fiddler, I learned instinct, groove, improvisation, and the joy of playing for people in community spaces. It taught me how to read a room, how to bring an audience in close, and how to take the whole place on a ride where everyone feels part of the story. As a classical violinist, I learned precision, depth, structure, and a different kind of connection — one rooted in long-form storytelling, nuance, and emotional architecture. It reaches people just as powerfully through a very different pathway.

Neither identity replaces the other – they inform each other. Fiddling gave me freedom and instinct; classical playing gave me depth and language. Together, they’ve shaped a wide emotional landscape that feels like home — two traditions intertwined, each making the other more alive and having tears and joy always along for the ride.

Is there anything one learns as a fiddler that resonates in the classical world?
Absolutely — everything. Fiddling was my first musical home, the place where I learned to step into the spotlight with comfort, spontaneity, and a real sense of play. It taught me how to read a room, how to trust my instincts, and how to live inside a deep internal rhythm that comes from the body as much as from the ear. In the fiddling world, there isn’t really a concept of “mistake” — you can change a note, reshape a phrase, improvise your way forward, and you’re always only one note away from making it sound like you meant it… or discovering that you did. That freedom becomes a way of breathing onstage. Those skills translate beautifully into classical performance, where authenticity matters just as much as virtuosity. Fiddling gave me the courage to be present, to react in real time, and to trust the connection between performer, colleagues, and audience. It opens up a different kind of expressive world — one that enriches everything I do in classical music.

Talk about your teaching philosophy.
My teaching rests on one principle: anything is possible.
Students learn to uncover their unique voice by developing the tools, mindsets, and curiosity to shape their own path. I focus on lifelong learning, self-awareness, strategic thinking, and empowering each artist to build a career that reflects who they genuinely are. My role is part teacher, part collaborator, part guide — helping them understand what’s possible and giving them the structure and support to reach it – in all areas that are meaningful in building a life in music and as a human.

William at the 2025 Norfolk Chamber Music Festival

What are your thoughts on the TSM Academy and the importance of teaching?
The Academy is one of TSM’s greatest strengths, the heart of what we do, and what sets us apart. It brings emerging musicians into direct, meaningful contact with world-class artists in an environment built on collaboration, curiosity, and the discovery of one’s artistic voice. It’s not just instruction — it’s immersion. And it was the most impactful single experience that I was privileged to do – only twice – when I was the age of our fellows.
For me, teaching is tied directly into performance. It’s how we pass forward the values, traditions, and humanity of this art form, and how I grow and learn as a performer myself. The Academy allows us to shape the next generation while weaving them into the living fabric of the festival itself — something uniquely possible at TSM. Nowhere else do you see strings and piano fellows, vocal artists through the Art of Song program, and community players all learning, rehearsing, and performing side by side. And the mentors are growing from this interaction with the fellows and master artists of tomorrow.  It’s a rare and remarkable ecosystem — and one of the things I’m most proud to help nurture.

Do you have anything you can tell us about the Toronto Summer Music Festival?
TSM is heading into a wonderfully exciting chapter — one that blends its rich history with fresh artistic ideas, wider community reach, and programming that speaks to the world we live in now. I’m having a great time shaping a festival that brings extraordinary artists to Toronto and builds new ways for audiences, students, and musicians to connect with one another. I can’t spill all the secrets just yet… but our season announcement is late February, and there’s a lot I can’t wait to share. Sign up for the mailing list now!

William at the 2025 TSM Gala

Do you ever feel conflicted, reconciling the business side and the art?
I actually see the two as complementary. The art is the heart of what we do, and the business provides the structure that allows that art to reach people, sustain itself, and grow. When the business side is aligned with the artistic vision, it becomes a powerful tool — one that amplifies creativity rather than constrains it.

In fact, the practical skills behind the scenes are often what allow artists to build meaningful, long-lasting careers. A strong foundation — whether it comes from our own training or from a great team around us — helps turn artistic ideas into real opportunities, real connections, and real impact. When art and business work together with clarity and purpose, they create a pathway where artists, audiences, and organizations can all thrive. My hope is that we keep inviting more openness into these conversations, tending the alignment between art and structure in ways that support our work, our artists, and our communities.

William Fedkenheuer

What can classical music learn from how popular musicians play & market their music?
Connection is paramount. Popular musicians speak directly to their audiences — emotionally, culturally, and generationally. They lean into instinct, vulnerability, storytelling, and authenticity, and their audiences feel seen in the process.
Classical musicians can embrace that same spirit while amplifying the depth of musical connection we already offer. We can communicate more openly, program with greater intention, and invite listeners into the world we’ve dedicated our lives to — not by simplifying it, but by humanizing it.

Classical music is literally everywhere. People encounter it in films, commercials, games, and cultural moments of every kind. We often know more of it than the cultural narrative suggests. When we highlight those connections — the shared emotions, the universal stories, the impact a single phrase can have — we meet audiences where they already are and open the door even wider.

Debussy and Wagner both spoke of the virtuoso as a kind of circus animal… does this influence how you perform or teach?
I think of virtuosity as freedom — the ability to express anything without limitation. And truthfully, I often wish I had even more of it. I’m most interested in virtuosity that performs with people: the kind that opens the door to deeper listening, bigger emotions, and more vivid storytelling. When technique becomes effortless, it frees the artist to be imaginative, daring, and deeply connected. That’s what I try to teach: virtuosity as a platform for meaning, not a destination. At its best, it becomes one of the most powerful tools we have for creating unforgettable, transformative moments. And sometimes, the simple act of being in awe is an emotion all its own — a reminder of one reason we make music in the first place!

Live or recorded performance? And how do you make recordings feel “live”?
Live performance is irreplaceable — the shared breath of a room, the immediacy, the risk, the community. You feel people leaning in. You see the interaction onstage: an eyebrow raised, the curl of a smile, the choice not to look at one another. All of those tiny signals let the audience into the inner life of a piece. Chamber music, especially, lives in that visible, palpable conversation between musicians.
Recording asks for a different intimacy. To make a recording feel “live,” I imagine playing for someone I care about — one person, right in front of me (over and over!). We often invite friends and colleagues into the physical space, in person or even over Zoom, because the moment another human is listening, the performance becomes more alive. That simple shift keeps us human, connected, and grounded in communication rather than perfection.
Both forms have their own magic. Live is about shared presence; recording is about distilled connection. But in both, the goal is the same: to make the listener feel like they’re part of the story.

If you could tell institutions how to train future artists, what would you change?
I would broaden our definition of success to reflect what musicians’ lives actually look like today.

That means teaching artistic identity, communication, community engagement, financial literacy, mental health strategies, and long-term career architecture — alongside technical and artistic excellence.

Musicians need more than skill; they need purpose, adaptability, relevance, and a sense of belonging in the wider world.

A few years ago, during the quiet of the pandemic, I wrote a post that struck a chord with thousands of musicians. It came out of years of research and more than two decades of performing, teaching, and watching colleagues build full, meaningful careers. It still captures what I believe about how we can evolve our training for the next generation —

Link: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DE3U7rsgN/

What teachers or influences were most important to your development?
Joan Barrett at Mount Royal, Kathleen Winkler at Rice, Robert McDonald at Juilliard, and Tom Novak at the Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center have each played formative roles in my artistic development and have become close friends and mentors along the way. Their guidance has shaped so many of the threads that continue to define a life and career in chamber music.

Equally meaningful are mentors outside the traditional artistic sphere. Tom Delbanco — the John F. Keane and Family Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center — has profoundly influenced my thinking around leadership, character, team building, and purpose. A lifelong community musician who grew up surrounded by many of the great artists of the past century, Tom has become both a dear friend and collaborator, and our musical adventures together have been among the most fulfilling of my life.

Each mentor, in their own way, has helped shape my curiosity, discipline, artistic integrity, sense of community, and belief that music can have genuine human impact. I’m deeply grateful to them all — they are woven into everything I do and into the lives of those I’m privileged to reach through music.

*******

William Fedkenheuer is planning the next Toronto Summer Music Festival that begins July 9th 2026. The season announcement is coming in February…(!)

William Fedkenheuer
Posted in Interviews, Music and musicology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interviewing versatile tenor Scott Rumble

I have heard tenor Scott Rumble a few times, a young artist who impressed both vocally and dramatically in Toronto Operetta Theatre’s Die Fledermaus in 2022.

Guillermo Silva-Marin as Frosch & Scott Rumble as Alfred in Die Fledermaus (photo: Gary Beechey)

Ah how I wish I could have seen him take on the heroic role of Siegmund in the Edmonton Opera production of Die Walküre last June.

Scott Rumble as Siegmund with Anna Pompeeva as Sieglinde, Act 1 Die Walküre Edmonton Opera (Nanc Price Photography)

He will be singing other intriguing music next year, the World Premiere of Adler’s Four Attributes of the Soul with Orchestra Toronto March 1st.

But first Scott appears in Toronto Operetta Theatre’s production of Imre Kalman’s Czardas Princess, running December 30th – January 4th to begin the New Year on an upbeat note.

Scott Rumble as Tassilo in Countess Maritza with TOT 2023 (photo: Gary Beechey)

Scott was willing to answer a few questions.

*******

Barczablog: Are you more like your father or mother?

Scott Rumble: I am more like my father. We look almost like the exact same person and our personalities are also very similar. We both have a love for the outdoors, but also a love of being inside watching YouTube, usually about the outdoors. My parents are really supportive of what I do, but they don’t really understand opera. They make an attempt to come to at least one show a year, usually the operetta because it’s in English and “almost like a musical”.

BB: What is the best or worst thing about what you do?

Scott Rumble: The best thing about what I do is getting to meet and work with some of the most amazing people I have ever met. It is a constant feeling of being inspired by what others are doing around me that makes me strive to better my own artistry. The worst thing would be being away from my usual routine. I tend to be a creature of habit and when I don’t have my usual schedule it can really throw me off.

BB: Who do you like to listen to or watch?

Scott Rumble: I like to watch a lot of different things. I love anime, true crime, history, and Youtube videos on video games, comedy, or fitness.

BB: What ability or skill do you wish you had, that you don’t have?

Scott Rumble: I wish that I could be a better writer or visual artist. I’ve never been really that good at either and always have a little jealousy to those that find it easy. I think it stems from seeing my brother be good at drawing from a young age and my inability to draw even a basic stick figure.

BB: When you’re just relaxing and not working, what is your favourite thing to do?

Scott Rumble: I really enjoy playing video games or board games with my friends. It’s a close group of people that we all feel a lot of stress being relieved through these activities, but new stresses added on from being competitive with each other.

BB: What is your favourite melody / piece of music?

Scott Rumble: My favourite melody comes from a song by DPR Ian called Peanut Butter & Tears, It has a very catchy chorus.

BB: Who is your favourite singer / favourite vocal performance

Scott Rumble: My favourite singer has increasingly become Peter Hofmann. His sound was very exciting and he gave such passionate performances.

Peter Hofmann as Siegmund

BB: Yes Hofmann was an amazing Siegmund, one of the best, managing to be lyrical in such a challenging role.

What was your first experience of singing?

Scott Rumble: My first experience of singing was singing in my church choir as a young boy. I did give it up for some time only to come back to it when I was 18.

BB: Is there a singer (tenor or otherwise) you identify with, whose voice influenced you? 

Scott Rumble: A singer whom I identify with and who has influenced me would be Jon Vickers. He was just able to do the most amazing colours with his voice and it really makes me work on discovering all of the colours of my voice.

BB: I share your admiration for Vickers. I had the honour to shake his hand backstage after hearing his Otello.

Do you have a favourite role as far as the singing , or the acting?

As Siegmund with Anna Pompeeva as Sieglinde, Act II Die Walküre Edmonton Opera (Nanc Price Photography)

Scott Rumble: My favourite role is one I just recently did. Siegmund in Die Walkure. I felt like it fit perfectly within my voice and I loved the immense amount of dramatic acting it required.

As Siegmund with Anna Pompeeva as Sieglinde, Act 1 Die Walküre Edmonton Opera (Nanc Price Photography)

BB: For your role in Czardas Princess, composed more than a hundred years ago is there anything in the role that really speaks to you in 2025, as universal in any century?

Scott Rumble: I think what I can really see as being universal in any century is the idea of your own independence and not going with everything others tell you to do. Love who you love, do what you do, be your own person.

BB: What role should I think of as ideal for your voice, and have you ever sung it? 

Scott Rumble: I think a role that is ideal for my voice is Bacchus in Ariadne auf Naxos. It really fits my range really well and suits what I can show off in my voice. I have been lucky enough to do it twice. Once with UBC Opera and once with Highlands Opera Studio.

Richard Margison

BB: Wow, speaking of Highlands Opera, Richard Margison (founder of Highlands Opera) sang the role of Bacchus last time the COC did Ariadne. Maybe next time it will be you..? I love that opera, and one of the things that makes it riskier to produce is the challenge of finding a singer who can handle such a challenging role as Bacchus.

So I wonder: do you sing differently in operetta than in opera? 

Scott Rumble: For operetta I do sing a little differently. I tend to bring out a lot more of my conversational sound and dynamics.  This way I really can bring out the diction and bridge the gap for the audience when going between dialogue and singing. Being reminded of being light and buoyant in my technique really helps in this repertoire.

Scott Rumble as Lieutenant Niki in A Waltz Dream TOT 2021 (photo: Gary Beechey)

In order to do this I focus on utilizing more of my head-voice and keeping the idea in my head that if I can’t act with my face the way I want, I am forcing too much.

BB: What is the story of this operetta in 20 words or less? 

Scott Rumble: A cabaret star pretends to be a princess, but her noble lover’s family objects until a discovery changes everyone’s fate.

BB: What’s the key moment in Czardas Princess (if you could tell the audience what to watch for)

Scott Rumble: The key moment in this operetta, like in most, is always the shocking revelation in Act 3 that solves all the problems everyone is having.

BB: What strategies do you use to keep your vocal production fluid & free when you have an emotional moment in the story? 

Scott Rumble: I really just let my voice do what it wants. If it is an emotional moment in a show I let my voice go with that emotion. Sometimes a sound doesn’t always have to be pretty for it to be effective.

BB: What do we not understand about being an operatic tenor? 

Scott Rumble: The mass amounts of anxiety and pressure that comes with needing to produce the climatic famous high notes while trying your best not to crack, but every tenor cracks, so you just have to go for it every time.

BB: Do you have any ideas about reforming / modernizing classical music culture to better align with modern audiences?

Scott Rumble: I think the more we can create art and allow everyone easier access to live music it will be better. I think changing things from the past is getting more and more difficult and some pieces should be just left to the wayside. But if there was a big focus on creating new big works that could become canon repertoire, I think that’s how we can bring classical music into the modern world. Music will always be enjoyed, but we need to make music that is for the modern audience. When we look back, people were writing for the people of the time, not for the past and that should continue. Along with this a lot of things that are stuck just based on tradition can be let go of as well. It will be remembered, but traditions are allowed to evolve and change. 

Scott Rumble and Kirsten LeBlanc in TOT’s Die Fledermaus 2022 (photo: Gary Beechey)

BB If you could speak to composers writing modern musicals: what’s missing in what they do today 

Scott Rumble: When I think of modern musicals and what makes them successful, it appears that when the libretto is good it makes the show. Composers will always write good music, for the most part. It’s when the words they set aren’t strong or create some sort of impact that it can fall short. The lyrics are what are being conveyed to the audience and when they feel it, they want to share it. Look at things like Hamilton and it’s mostly rap, but what made the impact of this show was the lyrics being said.

BB: Do you ever feel conflicted, reconciling the business side and the art?

Scott Rumble: I am really thankful for Dean Artists Management for this exact reason. It allows me to focus more of my time on the art.

BB: When we think of Bob Dylan or KD Lang reconciling sincerity & skill, nobody insists that they hit high notes or play difficult riffs on their instruments, so long as there’s a connection.  What if anything can classical music learn from the way popular musicians play & market their music?

Scott Rumble: I think what we can learn from this is that connection is always a super important thing to have with your music and to share it in a way that it can connect with people. Our technique is there to help us in the moments where in classical music we MUST hit a high note or do the difficult riff because it is written, but for me the main thing is to make people feel and if you can do that then the other stuff is less important.

BB: Debussy and Wagner both spoke of the virtuoso as a kind of circus animal, and the applause as a kind of trap.  I wonder what you’d say, as a performer who likely enjoys applause? 

Scott Rumble: I think as performers we are a trained individual trying to deliver an emotion to an audience. The applause I view as gratitude for what you’ve done, not as a reward that you seek every time, but more as a thank you for sharing your vulnerability and talent with us.

BB: Since the pandemic a great many ways artists are working virtually, both as teachers and as performers. Do you have a preference between live or recorded performance and when you record how do you make it seem live?

Scott Rumble: I prefer the live performance as there are many variables that can change each time, which makes it feel more exciting. For me recording always does feel live because I tend to only like to do one or maybe two takes of an aria because to me that is the most authentic version of my voice. It is what it would be in a live performance and I am always striving for perfection, knowing it’s really an unattainable thing.

BB: If you could tell the institutions how to train future artists, what would you change?

Scott Rumble: I think a thing that institutions don’t focus on until around a Master’s degree is acting in singing. It is important for conveying what you want to get across.

Scott Rumble as Count Tassilo in Countess Maritza with TOT 2023 (photo: Gary Beechey)

You can sing very beautifully, but if you show no connection emotionally or show you know what is being said it can look rather boring to watch. So bringing that in earlier into people’s training would be hugely beneficial.

BB: What influences / teachers were most influential on your development?

Scott Rumble: Teachers who influenced me greatly were Gwenlynn Little, Torin Chiles, and Patrick Raftery.

Gwen was the first to believe in my talents and push for me to apply to universities and gave me the first steps into singing operatically.

Gwenlynn Little

Torin Chiles helped solidify my technical foundation, especially doing a transition from singing as a baritone to a tenor in year 3 of my degree. He still helps me to this day with finding the ease of singing and new colours.

Torin Chiles

Patrick Raftery helped me find my full operatic voice by giving me new repertoire to try and to challenge myself into seeing what my voice could do.

Patrick Raftery

Turns out I was only using about half my voice until I worked with him and I owe him a great credit for telling me to just go for it when it came to my voice. Have no fear and just sing!

*******

Have no fear, reader, yes Scott will be singing.

Upcoming:
-Messiah with Kingston Symphony December 7th
-Kalman’s The Czardas Princess with Toronto Operetta Theatre Dec 30th – Jan 4th
-World Premiere of Adler’s Four Attributes of the Soul with Orchestra Toronto March 1
-Beethoven’s 9th with Symphony New Brunswick March 30 – April 1

Posted in Interviews, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Double Dixit delivers

This week Tafelmusik’s Chamber Choir began their season with a concert titled Double Dixit, a wonderful warm-up for the Messiah, coming in three weeks.

The singers in that choir are professionals at the highest level, among the best soloists collected together for performances such as this.

Antonio Lotti (1667-1740)

And that’s not all.

While the concert title suggests duality it’s the number three that figures in the different ways I understand Double Dixit. I think first of the musicological, second the rationale for the performers, and finally my enjoyment & appreciation, exploring the ways theory and practice intersect in the performance.

I would suggest that if at all possible go see & hear Double Dixit at Jeanne Lamon Hall Saturday or Sunday Nov 29 or 30, to see and hear it for yourself.

Curating such a concert is itself a creative act. The pre-concert chat for Double Dixit, from Tafelmusik Chamber Choir chorister Kate Helsen is a fascinating bit of speculative musicology.

She imagines an enjoyable way of understanding the relationships between composers Antonio Lotti (1667-1740), George Frideric Handel (1685-1759), both of whom set Psalm 110 aka Dixit Dominus, plus their mutual acquaintance, composer Agostino Steffani (1654-1728), whose brief Antiphon for St Cecilia’s Day opens the concert, apt because St Cecilia’s Day was last weekend.

So here we are living more than 300 years later, listening to their music, wondering about their influence upon one another. Knowing that these two masters must have met one another, it’s fun to imagine their interaction.

Let me add: I love that Tafelmusik did this. I’ll make a bizarre analogy, as I speak of what I wish I could see from Turner Classic Movies. We see so many different adaptations of Pride & Prejudice (we watched one last night, after I got home from the concert) or Little Women. Wouldn’t it be amazing and maybe useful to watch them consecutively, to observe differences & similarities? No they are not quite the same (especially observing that Handel inserts a “Gloria patri et filio” into the last stunning chorus of the text “Sicut erat in principio etc” leading to a fabulous and challenging Amen to conclude). But encountering Lotti’s setting right before Handel’s is a wonderful opportunity.

It’s not the first time I’ve thought that maybe Handel is an under-rated composer, rarely spoken of in the same sentence with Mozart & Beethoven or JS Bach, when we consider who might be the greatest of all. Oh and Handel was in his 20s when he wrote this amazing chorus to conclude his Dixit Dominus. Amazing. That alone is reason why I wish I could hear it again.

Let me shift focus to the practitioners, even as I remind you that the concert was conceived by performers rather than academics locked up in some sort of ivory tower. Tafelmusik is a remarkable organization, apparently more fluid in its power structures than the cliche image we have of 20th century orchestras led by men wielding their phallic batons. Yes they focus on historical performance practices, but perhaps they are at the forefront of a new way of organizing and running an orchestra.

The brilliant thing about Double Dixit is how many opportunities these pieces on the program afford for solos by the choristers of Tafelmusik Chamber Choir. The program mentions Roseline Lambert soprano soloist & Nicholas Burns alto soloist in the Lotti, plus Lindsay McIntyre & Jane Fingler soprano soloists (and Nicholas Burns again) in the Handel: although there were a number of other brief solos that are not listed in the program.

That’s useful for everyone, including the conductor, Ivars Taurins as he prepares his chorus for what’s coming next month.

Ivars Taurins (photo: Dahlia Katz)

One of the great pleasures of such a concert is the chance to watch Ivars conduct the orchestra (who were wonderful, excuse me that I say so little about them) and chorus, his body language like a dance articulating the text in his directions. There was one moment in the concluding chorus when it almost seemed as though Ivars wanted to climb over the orchestra to get to the chorus, his arms making magic in the response he generates in this phenomenal choral ensemble. They’re not the usual chorus, not when each of the singers is a talented soloist in their own right.

Double Dixit has two more performances, 8:00 on Saturday Nov 29 and 3:00 pm on Sunday Nov 30th. Tickets & info are found here.

And next month Tafelmusik bring us Messiah plus the singalong, Ivars undertaking his annual role as Herr Handel.

Ivars Taurins as Herr Handel (photo by Gary Beechey)

I have to think that his theatrical portrayal of the composer also enables his musical identification, making something like Double Dixit more authentic.

Posted in Music and musicology, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Discovering the brilliant virtuoso Tony Siqi Yun

“I am a lucky guy.” That’s my mantra as a person seeking to live a life of gratitude: and sometimes it has proven to be true.

My friends Gary & Bill left town for a family bris, giving me tickets to hear Tony Siqi Yun playing the piano at Koerner Hall, a concert that I had not intended to hear, Lucky me, thank you Gary & Bill.

You may not have heard of Tony Siqi Yun, a young Canadian pianist with formidable talent. I understand that although the Royal Conservatory of Music in Toronto is a pipeline for talent, this was the first time Tony had been to Koerner Hall. And I hope he will return.

Pianist Tony Siqi Yun

Here’s the program we heard Sunday afternoon:

JS Bach: Chaconne from Partita No. 2 for Violin in D Minor, BWV 1004/BV B24 (arr. Busoni)
Robert Schumann: Theme and Variations in E flat Major, WoO 24 (“Ghost Variations”)
Franz Liszt: “Après une lecture du Dante, fantasia quasi una sonata” from Années de pèlerinage II, S. 161
INTERMISSION
Luciano Berio: Wasserklavier
Johannes Brahms: Piano Sonata No. 3 in F Minor, op. 5

Today was also the Santa Claus Parade, playing havoc with those of us trying to drive downtown. I left home at 1:00 pm for a 3:00 concert, because I had been warned about the parade and had planned my trip knowing the parade’s route. Between the first and second item (Bach-Busoni and Schumann), the inevitable latecomers were seated in the hall, likely unaware that their lateness meant that they may have missed the best item on the program.

Busoni wrote & premiered his transcription in 1893 while he was living in the USA. I have listened to many versions, usually fascinated by the display of pure virtuosity, the ways in which Busoni seems to turn the pianist into a show-off. Tony’s reading is the first time I set that all aside, partly because he made it seem so easy, partly because of how well the piece was shaped in the interpretation, no longer a showoff exercise, not weighed down by the shadow of Bach but freed to be flamboyant Busoni. Tony played parts softer than I’ve ever heard them played. The dynamic range he shows us is, excuse me for contradicting myself, might seem to be showing off except that it’s very musical, working completely in the service of Busoni’s vision. It’s clean playing, a huge number of notes but totally well-articulated.

The Schumann that followed was perhaps the sanest Schumann, no evidence of the divided genius (that was how he spoke of his own personality), more logical and coherent than any piece I have ever heard, especially in Tony’s hands. We heard a gentle interlude, a piece that never seemed difficult or challenging.

Pianist Tony Siqi Yun

The audience was so quiet at the end of the last variation (i prepared to applaud, but not wanting to disturb the silence): but Tony went on when we didn’t applaud. I’ve seen this from the Toronto Symphony a couple of times when they deliberately programmed pieces from different composers without a break, going from Ligeti to Wagner, while this time Tony took us from Schumann to Liszt.

The Liszt Tony played did what I dream of. I’ve been discussing this a lot with Erika, that when I play something like the Bach-Busoni, and she doesn’t enjoy it, that means I have failed. An interpreter is like a lawyer, advocating for the piece. If I can’t make Erika like the piece, I am letting the composer down. Of course I am no virtuoso, just ambitious verging on delusional in what I am undertaking. But what I am leading up to is the next piece, one that I have never really understood, until what I heard from Tony.

The way that this item is listed in the program is a tantalizing glimpse. It’s shown as ““Après une lecture du Dante, fantasia quasi una sonata” from Années de pèlerinage II, S. 161”. I wish we could encounter this piece in its place among the other short works that make up that second year of Liszt years of pilgrimage. Year two is very literary, including the three stunning Petrarch sonnet pieces. We are brought by Liszt to a remote place of contemplation when he throws this humongous stink-bomb of Dante at us, full of ruminations upon the battles between good and evil. I may be missing the point, but I feel Liszt wants us to experience this as a kind of melodrama, an episodic series of emotional twists & turns, that may leave us feeling dizzy. Perhaps too Liszt was not just struggling with the piano or Dante but with his faith, given that he would become a priest, putting himself into the conversation not at the keyboard but into priestly attire if not actually preaching. The piece is not as polite as a sermon, though, and more of a silent movie score unafraid to contrast the sweet angelic music with fearsome noise, fearful effects sudden abrupt shifts: especially as Tony dared to play it. I have never made sense of the piece before now. Tony is a thoughtful pianist, a genuine poet himself. We were listening not to feats of pianism but coups de theatre, big brash moments to suggest a battle between celestial forces. And while we’re at it, I’m not sure Liszt is properly appreciated, given that melodrama is no longer understood as a high form. But maybe it’s best seen alongside such modern melodramas as Howard Shore’s stunning score for The Two Towers or John Williams sweeping gestures in The Empire Strikes Back. No we didn’t get to hear the whole of the Années de pèlerinage II, but I see that music differently now.

I wonder if some Toronto venue could get Tony to play one of those complete years of pilgrimage.

Pianist Tony Siqi Yun

After intermission came Berio’s Wasserklavier, two minutes of tranquility. In Tony’s reading I was reminded of a barcarolle by Mendelssohn or Chopin, music you’d hear from a gondolier while you drift among gentle waves in a boat.

Again we were on to the next piece immediately because there was no applause after the brief Berio serenade, urgently taken up by the young Brahms. I also feel lucky about the serendipity of my opportunities to hear, again meeting a young brahmsian adventure comparable to his German Requiem that I heard recently. Later Brahms would orient himself according to forms we know well in his Symphonies & Concerti, but in his earlier works there is the sense of a wanderer, following his heart rather than a rule-book. At times we were in realms that were passionate, then dance rhythms suggesting a more extroverted side to the composer. Then we were taken into something softer & more mysterious. Tony honoured the changing directions and moods of the composer’s explorations, sometimes subtly internalized, sometimes brash and confident, subtly powerful inexorably building to a masterful conclusion. I am projecting of course, but I thought Tony identified with Brahms, the young composer finding his way, finding his voice.  

The encore was more Brahms, a well-known waltz.

I wonder if the subtle poet I thought I observed in Tony, is perhaps still discovering how to be a virtuoso. Twice in the concert he played on, rather than giving a signal for applause. No he is no egomaniac, that is certain. Instead of showing us that it’s time for us to applaud he went on. I find that remarkable, even if it may signal a certain introspection, a nerdy focus on his art. But in a world of slick hair & fashion choices, I prefer this artist’s devotion to art.

I want to share what I found when I went to YouTube for more. First and foremost, here’s a performance of the Bach-Busoni, that might show why I am so enthusiastic.

Yes he can get his fingers to play the notes, but what’s more important is the way he organizes those notes, building from softness to stunning climaxes. My mind is boggled by how accurately and how cleanly he plays, how well I can discern what he is doing, and how this video reminds me so well of what I heard Sunday in Toronto, so many years after the video performance. There is more variety between variations, but they’re coherent, when he suddenly goes into a different gear at a totally different tempo. I am very much in awe.

There are other pieces on YouTube that I wish we had heard. I hope to see and hear him playing live again. Enjoy! And in the spirit of Thanksgiving (the American one is this week) I am grateful for the many excellent pieces Tony has shared.

Thank you Tony! And thank you Gary & Bill for the chance to hear Tony. I am a lucky guy.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Music and musicology, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Voicebox Opera in Concert’s Canadian premiere of Richard Coeur-de-Lion

Today I witnessed the Canadian premiere of André Grétry’s Richard Coeur-de-Lion, presented by Voicebox: Opera in Concert at the Jeanne Lamon Hall.

Colin Ainsworth was singing the title role, but was indisposed, courageously singing the role but often dropping to a lower octave. The result was bravely harmonious, even if it wasn’t precisely as Grétry wrote it. I suppose it’s fitting that in this portrayal of the heroic lion-hearted king, Colin seemed to be fearless, truly brave in what he did with his voice. While it wasn’t as written it was stunning to watch all the same, part of an entertaining afternoon of music theatre.

Tenor Colin Ainsworth

The chorus was the big star of the show. Robert Cooper was self-effacing while directing them to perfection, especially the men, who had a much bigger role to play in this macho story of heroism. Sometimes they were in the background, sometimes they had to move or dance, and the whole time they were clearly enunciating their French.

Music Director Suzy Smith at the piano was the other key, excuse the pun, leading a tight & brisk reading that made a strong case for Grétry’s score.

I sincerely congratulated Guillermo Silva-Marin afterwards for this milestone. This is the reason we go to hear Voicebox, for the priceless opportunity to discover new operas like this one. Sung in French but with English dialogue by Guillermo & Diane Loeb, the audience gobbled it up with enthusiasm, laughing often.

While Richard Coeur-de-Lion may be understood as a prototype for rescue opera, it felt like Fidelio turned upside down. Instead of a comic beginning overtaken by a serious dramatic opera, Grétry’s preference was for beautiful melodies and a fun story without much real suspense or danger.

It was very entertaining. Premiered in 1784 this is not to be mistaken for a piece full of virtuoso arias or high notes to show off the voice, but rather a tuneful composition allowing everyone in the cast to shine, the music in service of the storytelling.

Richard may be the title role but his friendly squire Blondel (tenor Yannik Gosselin) has a much bigger part. Initially disguised Blondel is trying to find his master, aided by Antonio, a trouser role sung by soprano Madeline Cooper. The story is as much romance as rescue. Florestan (Taylor Gibbs) was going to meet Laurette (Alice Macgregor), but unexpectedly he’s surrounded & the troops of the Countess (Nicole Katerberg) will help rescue Richard. Everything ends happily, and never mind how it’s accomplished, considering that it’s not the way the historical story played out. Love conquers all.

Voicebox: Opera in Concert return Saturday, February 14, 2026 (3 pm) at Jeanne Lamon Hall, Trinity-St. Paul’s Centre for La Sonnambula.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cathartic tears on November 11th

With every Remembrance Day, I wonder how best to respond to the implications of November 11th, a day when we are encouraged to honour those who gave their lives in wars, in service to the nation.

I went to a school where we had a very powerful ritual celebration every November 11th, led by Mr Bull, a teacher who was a war veteran, who taught us the meaning of solemnity.

He explained the metaphor of the Last Post & Reveille, that when you went to bed at war, you were not guaranteed to wake up the next morning. I liked the clarity of this presentation, which is never so clear anymore when the metaphor is mixed with other poems & songs between the two trumpet calls.

At the end of the service we were marched out of the auditorium, smallest kids first (which was scary the first time I did that), walking between the walls listing the students who had died in the wars. As the school was founded in 1910 we had graduates who died in both world wars and in Korea.

We were trained to be faithful to the flag and the country, perhaps in keeping with the instructions given in the poem “In Flanders Field”, a powerful injunction if you grow up being told to honour those who made the ultimate sacrifice. I wear a poppy, I support the Canadian Forces, especially those who served. All the friends I met in church who served overseas have now passed away. It’s apt that they are remembered both on November 1st and November 11th.

Some of us (me) were more naive and ready to follow our teachers than others. I only know that I felt conflicted by John McRae’s specific request. The last verse is clear.

Take up our quarrel with the foe;
To you from failing hands, we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break the faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

We have been at peace for my whole life, although Canada’s soldiers sometimes went overseas as peacekeepers. That assuages my fears somewhat, when I think of McRae’s suggestion that they “shall not sleep”.

Today I watched Derek Jarman’s 1989 film War Requiem. Britten’s War Requiem, featuring lines from poet Wilfred Owen, is the soundtrack for this stunning film with no actual dialogue.

We see Laurence Olivier as an old soldier clutching medals in a wheel chair, pushed by a nurse played by Jarman’s frequent collaborator Tilda Swinton.

The old soldier (Laurence Olivier) & the nurse (Tilda Swinton)

Because it’s November 11th, I heard the closing passage of Britten’s War Requiem as an answer to McRae, perhaps hearing it clearly for the first time.

The tenor and baritone sing “Let us sleep now.” More war means more young men called to arms, and dying.

If you’re someone who has lived through war and is easily triggered by loud sounds or images of death or battle, this is not the film for you. Jarman does not take an easy path, sometimes juxtaposing images of children playing at war with toy guns, to real images of life & death struggle.

I feel fortunate. I have uveitis, an inflammation of the iris that we used to call “iritis” twenty years ago. It’s one of the recurring symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis that would hurt far worse if I didn’t have the relief via steroid drops that take away the pain thank goodness. My eyes don’t want to work too hard, refusing to focus after a certain point. I emulate Ray Charles, wearing sunglasses indoors because bright light hurts my eyes. All being well my eyes will recover.

I mention this by way of explanation for why I’m going to fewer concerts than usual right now. After a certain point in the day my eyes seem to be working to rule, refusing to do anything complicated, especially in the evening.

But my eyes have an endless capacity to shed tears which is probably a healthy response. I had wetness on my cheeks during Lepage’s Far side of the moon, during the Mendelssohn Choir concert of Brahms A German Requiem and again today watching Jarman’s meditation on war.

At this point in his life, in 1989 one might call Jarman a dead man walking, aware of his AIDS diagnosis and a near-certain death in his future. He would pass away 5 years later. As of 1989 Europe was on the brink of a new era of peace. As of 2025 the optimism we recall when the Berlin Wall came down, with the excitement of glasnost & perestroika feels very remote, hard to recall. In the film the violence of war builds to the ultimate expression of violence, images of nuclear war. This is no glorification of men in arms but a portrayal of the futility of war. I hope we have not forgotten that part.

While it may go against the grain of November 11th and the poem with the poppies, I am grateful for Jarman’s film and what he says, a meditation on war that feels cathartic at a time when so many of the people I know are feeling despair. I will watch it again tomorrow.

Derek Jarman (1942-1994)

Posted in Cinema, video & DVDs, Personal ruminations & essays | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mendelssohn Choir — Brahms German Requiem

Friday night Toronto Mendelssohn Choir & Musicians of Kitchener – Waterloo Symphony presented Brahms German Requiem in a sold out Koerner Hall to rapturous applause.

I had been initially concerned that this massive work employing a big choir & orchestra could feel overwhelming in such an intimate space with its live acoustic: but they thought of that. Instead of the usual version we heard a revised orchestration by Joachim Linckelmann for chamber orchestra, last night numbering under 30 players, offering a good balance to the 160 + choristers in the TMC.

Toronto Mendelssohn Choir & KW Symphony in Koerner Hall, moments before the concert began

It also helps that Artistic Director Jean-Sébastien Vallée led a restrained & gentle reading of this profoundly fascinating work. Speaking as someone who still uses the old-school term “accompanist” to describe what I do at the piano or organ, I am grateful for an interpretation that doesn’t aim for bombast and drama, when subtlety and patience might be more illuminating. A good accompanist is a good listener and a follower above all. If you’ve heard the piece done in its large-scale orchestration you will likely have heard the orchestra making big sounds, with the choir immersed in that sound. I admire subtlety in a musician, and that’s what we heard, both in the large-scale movements and in the solos from soprano Charlotte Siegel and baritone Russell Braun, singing with great delicacy & sensitivity.

Vallée explained his thinking in his introductory remarks, pointing to the ways in which Brahms chose an unconventional approach. As Vallée explained Brahms’ textual choices and their settings show less concern for the dead than with the survivors, their feelings and how one lives. We’re at the time of year when we’re retrospective both for the Saints we remember on November 1st and another sort of Remembrance on November 11th, as we were reminded by Vallée.

Jean-Sébastien Vallée, Artistic Director of the Toronto Mendelssohn Choir

Serendipity is a word I keep using lately, fortunate to stumble yet again upon a performance helping me process grief & bereavement. While the promotional campaign would have you believe that Robert Lepage’s play concerns the space program, I understood Far Side of the Moon as a piece concerning intimate concerns of identity in the wake of his mother’s passing. That was last week. This time it was Johannes Brahms who composed his Requiem in the immediate aftermath of losing his mother.

Jean-Sébastien Vallée conducting Musicians of the Kitchener – Waterloo Symphony

I must express my gratitude for how well TMC assembled and curated this evening of gentle associations, beginning with the image on the cover of the program. As I Lay Sleeping by Vanessa McKernan, was chosen by Toronto Mendelssohn Choir as the image gracing the cover of the program, an image that was pertinent for both of the pieces being performed.

Painting As I Lay Sleeping by Vanessa McKernan
http://www.vanessamckernan.com | Instagram: @vainteInstagram: @vainter

The brief world premiere to open the program from the Mendelssohn choir’s composer in residence Stephanie Martin was also a helpful prelude to what was to come, both as far as its sonorities and its texts.

Here’s an explanatory passage from the program, written by Rena Roussin, the Mendelssohn Choir’s musicologist-in-residence: “Echo is receiving its premiere tonight, and was written expressly for the purpose of being a companion piece to the Requiem. Martin sets the text of an 1854 poem by the English poet Christina Rossetti, joining it to select texts from the traditional Latin Requiem (the Mass for the Dead). Rossetti wrote “Echo” shortly after the death of her father, writing on themes of memory and connection after death.”

First let me show you the poem:
Echo:

Come to me in the silence of the night;
Come in the speaking silence of a dream;
Come with soft rounded cheeks and eyes as bright
As sunlight on a stream;
Come back in tears,
O memory, hope, love of finished years.
Oh dream how sweet, too sweet, too bitter
sweet,
Whose wakening should have been in
Paradise,
Where souls brimfull of love abide and meet;
Where thirsting longing eyes
Watch the slow door
That opening, letting in, lets out no more

Yet come to me in dreams, that I may live
My very life again tho’ cold in death:
Come back to me in dreams, that I may
give
Pulse for pulse, breath for breath:
Speak low, lean low,
As long ago, my love, how long ago

In addition, right in the middle of the poem, Martin inserts an echo of sorts, the Latin words from the Requiem:

Echo:
In paradisum deducant te Angeli Into Paradise: may angels guide you
In tuo adventu suscipiant te Martyres. at your arrival the Martyrs will receive you

I found myself thinking about the way we experience dreams, that a dream can seem like an echo of something we lived, that the recollection and memory of incidents and persons are like dreams. Memory is like an echo. I remember the phrase in the hymn “Oh God our help in ages past”, when it says.
Time, like an ever-rolling stream, /Bears all its sons away;
They fly, forgotten, as a dream / Dies at the op’ning day

Such words are in some respects interchangeable, or at least suggestive of one another. Repetition in an echo is a lot like what we experience in music especially in a hymn, where we repeat something. The effect of repetition in ritual, makes more of an echo. I was very moved by the way Martin set up the entry of that echo phrase in Latin, employing a smaller group of singers in one register, strongly suggesting something dreamlike, spiritual, and appropriately angelic.

If you read the poem, it’s beautiful with a definite suggestion of the afterlife. Martin understood the possibilities of the poem and the musical idea of an echo. What she achieved was in my estimation worthy of its placement alongside the Brahms piece, both in her subtle emulation of Brahms in her harmonies & metre, but also in the gentle handling of the text. I sat with tears flowing down my face, my voice barely able to utter the “brava” Martin so richly deserved. I do hope to hear this again, and hope that the Mendelssohn Choir will record the piece.

Composer, musician and composition professor Stephanie Martin

I wondered at the risk of pairing the immense Brahms work with a new piece, a daunting prospect for the composer of the new work. I can’t help recalling R Murray Schafer speaking of commissions to begin concerts while the late-comers found their way to their seats. “The contract read: ‘It is agreed that the work shall have a minimum duration of approximately seven(7) minutes and no longer than ten (10) minutes.’  That is, the work was to be what Canadian composers call a ‘piece de garage’, intended for performance while the patrons were parking their cars. ”

Imagine the challenge in our culture, that your music is to be presented alongside this solemn work, sometimes with such dim expectations. But Martin more than met that challenge. I congratulate her and the TMC, that they planned and created a stunning opener for the Brahms that followed. For me, heresy as it may be to say so, Echo was the highlight of the evening.

Soloists Charlotte Siegel and Russell Braun with members of the Toronto Mendelssohn Choir and Musicians of the Kitchener- Waterloo Symphony

I have one small topic to mention yet again, as the Mendelssohn Choir show us what’s possible. While the first piece by Martin was in English with a little bit of Latin, they projected titles above the stage for the entire work. They’re helpful, I can’t say this often enough. And of course when we came to the Brahms they also gave us titles. I wish this were standard procedure, especially for that orchestra who regularly play with the TMC at Roy Thomson Hall.

I had a splendid experience, carefully planned months before when Martin was commissioned to compose a work making perfect preparation for the Brahms. The choir prepared studiously, deported themselves carefully onstage. I’m very grateful for what I saw and heard.

The Toronto Mendelssohn Choir will be back December 2nd & 3rd for their annual Festival of Carols at Yorkminster Park Baptist Church, and will appear with the Toronto Symphony for their annual performances of the Messiah December 16-17-19-20-21 at Roy Thomson Hall.

Posted in Art, Architecture & Design, Music and musicology, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kyle and Corey reflect on the Lion-hearted King and the operas telling their stories

Kyle & Corey, as in Kyle Derek Mcdonald and Corey Arnold are the two creators of The Lion Heart, an opera being presented in concert in Ottawa November 15-16, one of several things they’re doing. I wanted to ask Kyle and Corey about their process and their future projects.

*******

Barczablog: Gentlemen, it’s great to get a chance to ask you a few questions.

Kyle and Corey: Hello, sir and dear readers! We’d like to begin by saying how thrilled we are to be chatting with you about this exciting new opera! And, before anything else, follow us on:

Kyle: Instagram | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube | Websites Mightier Productions | Kyle Derek

Corey: Instagram | Facebook | LinkedIn | Website

Barczablog: Is it a new opera or the same one we saw in Toronto a few years ago? 

Kyle: Yes, our in concert performances this November in Ottawa are of the same opera from the winter of 2022, but with some lessons learned!

Corey: I saw some things I wanted to work on during our workshop in Toronto, so I enlisted the help of Montreal native, Samuel Andreyev, who now lives in Europe and works internationally as a composer and professor of composition.

Samuel Andreyev

Corey: I wanted to make sure that this orchestration, which is significantly larger, would be a step higher in other domains such as balance, precision of colour, etc… So it’s the same show, but beefed up on my side.

Kyle: There have been a few changes to the text with a few lines that just never quite satisfied me – they’re too small to mention, really, but for those of us who are confronted with our own work, sometimes you just need to make the kink in your neck go away and make the changes.

BB: November 15-16 to be presented in concert. Who is participating (conductor, singers)?

Kyle: Yes! We’ve assembled Ottawa’s finest to share our little adventure with the people of the nation’s capital. First and foremost, of course, in the composer, Corey Arnold, who’s an Ottawa native!

Young bass Matthew Li, who sings the title role, tenor Philip Klaassen (his loyal minstrel), and baritone Mark Wilkinson (captain of the guards) all have strong ties to Ottawa.

Coloratura Natacha Demers (Mirella), a Gatineau native currently based in Montreal, and baritone Michael Robert-Broder (her oafish brother Walo) hails from Toronto and a very exciting young cast of exceptional singers. 

Corey: Maestro John Kraus, who conducted for the Northumberland Symphony Orchestra, now conducts both the Parkdale Orchestra and Kanata Symphony Orchestra in Ottawa. After Parkdale performed a few excerpts from our opera, he was the one who approached us about doing the full thing at this larger scale.

Conductor John Kraus


BB: Could you offer the rough synopsis of the story you started with and what it became in your Libretto (?), what you chose to skip or add?

Kyle: The libretto is shaped by an amalgamation of various hero-worship stories that grew up around Richard I, the Lion Heart, who was king of England from 1189 until his death in 1199. In 1191-92 he went to the Holy Land on Crusade and clashed against the forces of the great Sultan, Saladin. After the war, he was separated from his fleet by a storm, and this is where the legents begin (though his deeds on Crusade are themselves legendary, but are entirely true! Being verified by chroniclers on both sides of the conflict, some of which we touch upon in the opera). 

Kyle Derek Mcdonald

Kyle: The first legend that I encountered that told me that there was an opera in it all was that when Richard didn’t return home to England after he was separated from his fleet during a storm, his loyal minstrel, Blondel de Nesles, went across Europe singing the songs they sang together in the Holy Land. What better hook? And what better fodder for an opera? 

The next few inspirations were smatterings of various legends and fables about Richard’s deeds while in captivity (he was captured after he was separated from his fleet), imprisoned by Duke Leopold of Austria, and then later King Henry the Lion of Germany. I’m sure there’s another opera in the Lion Heart and the Lion getting on in their love of the hunt and mirth, but that’s for another day. The exchange of punches we see between Walo and Richard was from one legend; the affectionate young maiden – Mirella in our piece – is from another; the battle with the lion from yet another; I put them all under Leopold’s roof (though in some tellings the merging had already occurred) and unified the action so that it transpires in roughly 24 hours. I wanted to hew to Aristotle’s unities of Time, Place, and Action, but the story demanded a departure from Time (events that unfold in real time, like Oedipus Rex), and life goes on.

I wanted to give the audience a sense of Richard’s bravery, but I knew I couldn’t get bogged down in too many details that aren’t shown (opera is not the vehicle for this kind of story telling), so I found a fun way to work some of his most astonishing feats into the main number of Act II: the duet with the adventure-hungry Mirella, which evolves into the “moral of the story.” “Hope lives, so do not heed retreat. It’s fear who’ll suffer the defeat.” The swashbuckling, dare all drama of the duet is suddenly humbled into a pious reflection on the of the grace of heaven and the glory of hope.

My mission was to create a tight, fast-moving (but appropriately paced) book that would give my composer all the cues he needs to make a galloping score with all the right oases in about 90 minutes. And I believe we accomplished that!

BB: By coincidence your performances of your opera (Sat Nov 15, 8 pm & Sun Nov 16, 3 pm) get produced the same weekend Toronto’s Voicebox – Opera In Concert will do Gretry’s 18th century opera comique Richard Cœur-de-Lion (Saturday, November 15, at 3 PM). The Gretry opera is understood as a rescue opera. Is your opera also a rescue opera? Or a heroic romantic opera? Do you have a sense of what genre you’ve written: and does genre even matter anymore?  

Kyle: Clearly Toronto wasn’t big enough for the both of us! I’m ultimately disappointed I won’t be able to see it! I was aware of Gretry’s opera when I first set down to write ours – the focus of Gretry is really Blondel, and is structured like a comic opera with a lot of complicated relationships and overlapping happenstances that can make for a very enjoyable evening. Ours is really an adventure story with larger-than-life but oh-so-recognizable characters whose antics ultimately bring about a tragedy that changes the course of everyone’s lives. The first two acts can ultimately be considered a comedy, but things take a devastating turn in act three and everyone is pushed to their limits as honour trembles and cruelty rages. However, not to spoil it, the opera resolves in triumph so I can send my audience home happy and humming.

Corey: Not much to add here, except that the music of these two operas very much reflect the music of their time. So, very different!

BB: When we look at operas such as Gretry’s or the various films of Robin Hood that show us glimpses of Richard, have we ever seen the truth? While I love this following piece of film I know that it’s completely untrue. (Forgive me for including it)

Place your adaptation in a scale for me, between truth and fiction. Are you more truthful than the others I mention? 

Kyle: Richard’s catalogue of military deeds, which he shares in “Harken Maiden and Behold” the main duet of Act II, are all TRUE. His prowess on the battlefield is truly legendary and both Christian and Islamic chroniclers were utterly baffled by his daring and ability. It’s true that John, his brother, usurped the throne while he was in captivity; it’s true that he was held captive in Austria; it’s true that Jerusalem was won in a truce; it’s true that one of his chroniclers and drinking buddies was Blondel de Nesles. It’s true that England loved him so much that they essentially paid half their annual GDP to ransom him back. Robin Hood himself is a myth, so Richard’s involvement there is a testament to how well beloved he was.

A manuscript image of the coronation of Richard I in 1189.

After that, however, I yield me to the legends and seek to find the truth in the relationships and personas rather than in the chronicles. 

BB: Alas the “truth” might be that Richard died far from home, cheated, forgotten. In opera do we seek the myth instead of nasty truth?

Kyle: My general reasoning is: if the true story is so extraordinary that it hits all the right spots for good storytelling, then have at it and change as little as possible. If not, then put the realities aside and be as creative and interesting as possible. The adage “never let the truth spoil a good story” has been a lesson I took a long time to ingest, but it’s now one I live by (artistically). In real life, I’m pathologically attached to the discovery and transmission of truth regardless of consensus or the fractures it may cause – it’s a tension I’ve experienced for my whole life and I’m still working through how to manage it.

BB: Do you write with at least some thought (peripheral vision?) that companies will produce your opera : and if so, what are the biggest challenges to making your opera something they would want to produce 

Kyle: Yes, early in my stagewriting career I had pieces with casts in the dozens (one play I wrote about the first triumvirate was up to about 40, if I recall correctly), and, having been schooled in the real world of live performance, my personal challenge is now to tell the biggest stories with the least amount of resources and without sacrificing quality. When writing I always have an eye on feasibility and budget. You saw my Conan and the Stone of Kelior in 2022 where I was able stretch 14 performers to cover 21 characters and a full chorus. Creativity is always the answer, and it often yields more exciting figurative material which I think is what the theatre is really all about.

With opera specifically, there are many considerations: orchestra size, voice types, vocal stamina staging vs breath support, tailoring roles to singers rather than the other way around, duration, thematic appropriateness (is opera the best vehicle for rapid-fire philosophical exchanges or non-linear, abstract explorations?). The advantage to tech today is that projection is changing the game with regards to set building and cost. Lighting is also a kind of magic, so there’s much that can be done without enormous, elaborate sets or soaring expenses.

This biggest challenge to getting companies to produce our work is, to put it simply, ideological. All of the major pipelines across North America have turned an eye towards identity activism – a mold that seems to include neither Corey or myself. Canada is the worst for this because of the priority groups in the granting system. We actually wrote about this a few years ago and were speaking with Quillette about publishing it. Ultimately, we went with Counterweight magazine out of the UK, which has since closed down. If the readers are really keen, Corey and I can dig up the piece and publish exclusively through the Barczablog and stir the pot.

BB: We can maybe discuss that further another time.

Kyle: Until leadership decides to serve the audience instead of the cause, sales will continue to dwindle, and new work will continue to unimpress. I think it’s worth noting that the Canada Council for the Arts has such confidence in our work, that they granted us the lion’s share of our budget despite the priority groups. I think this is good news, and I believe a change is coming. When it is, we’ll be there, ready to rock. Until then, we do it our way.

Corey: In the world of musical theatre, we have the flexibility to allow a performer to present a distinctive perspective on the character and we want to bring that flexibility to our own works. John Kirby’s work on Walo gave us a handful of new comedic moments for the character, and we adjusted the score to take advantage of them.

Bass Matthew Li

Our Richard for this production, Matthew Li, has a different voice and tessitura than Kyle does, so I rejigged the role a bit so that the dramatic moments properly create drama for his voice. This flexibility allows us to cater the show to different performers. Budget-wise, we make sure that every opera we produce has flexibility in orchestration. The Lion Heart has three versions now, Piano-Vocal, 16 piece, and 40-piece. Similarly, our second opera, The Bat & The Bells, has three versions: Piano-Vocal, Piano-Flute-Cello, and 10-piece. While the opera world mostly looks at this level of flexibility as belonging to the world of amateurs and regional companies, playing with scope and maximizing the impact at any level of scope (think of Bluebeard’s castle from Edmonton Opera) is an avenue the large opera companies have barely begun to explore, if at all, and I anticipate it will be one of the easiest ways to start improving the business model of opera companies, once they get their heads out of the way.

BB: Do you identify with any aspect of this opera ?

Kyle: Absolutely! Richard is the chivalric ideal – brave, fearsome, just, educated, witty, and convivial. While, like any of us, he has his faults, he’s still a grand example of someone (even in legend) to try to live up to. 

I also identify with keeping hope foremost in one’s thoughts – times are tough, the world is changing rapidly, and many of us feel lost and betrayed. Richard fights a literal lion in the opera, but the lion is actually the figurative representation of despair. In order to overcome our lion, we have to believe it’s possible, and that’s hope. 

Kyle McDonald

I identify with the powerful friendship between Richard and Blondel, and this in many ways mirrors my relationship with the composer, Maestro Arnold. He lives in Ottawa and I in Toronto, so our time together these days is sadly limited. But I saw him just this last weekend (end of October) and you know what we did? We pulled out the score and played and sang after a long spell apart. Then we talked about our next ambitious project: Possession. I imagine this is exactly what Richard and Blondel did over a few bottles of something aromatic and potent during those dark and dusty nights on the campaign.

And from Corey’s side of things (I don’t want to put words in his mouth but…) I remember when we first started working on the project that he was surprised by Richard’s confidence and assertiveness, and was worried he wouldn’t be able to adequately capture the dash. I can say that Corey has not only captured the dash, but is now displaying some of it in his own life as he’s developed into a bit of a swashbuckler himself: I couldn’t be more pleased!

Corey: Haha yes, Kyle’s right… I must say that this show has captured ideas that did echo some of my personal transformations. We often consume endless media showing horrible things happening to people as a form of entertainment (thrillers, horror, drama) or outrage (political content). But more and more, I’m interested in how the characters respond to this hardship: Do they dissolve into fear and despair, or do they resist the gnawing sensation to stay focused? Do they lose sight of their morality, clawing back peers and their fellow human to get ahead, or do they maintain their integrity? And when I watch, do I maintain the grace and clarity of mind that would be useful in times of hardship, or does cheap criticism come fast & furious? I’m looking for characters I can admire, who teach me about staying focused, being considerate, all while surmounting extraordinary challenges..

BB: Do you have any advice to offer librettists or composers? 

Kyle: Know the best medium for your story. This applies mostly to the librettists, but composers too should know what stories music serves best. Have extended, and perhaps even heated, discussions over cocktails or wine about what you’re in it for, and the kind of impact you want to have. Debate character, instrumentation, structure, and sensibility regardless of whether you’re the composer or librettist, and then, when the time comes, trust your counterpart in his/her domain knowing that you’ve gone through it all together and have put all your ideas on the table. Then, do everything in your power to facilitate whatever your counterpart needs.

Corey: There’s a tremendous amount of complexity to an opera. Your instincts will do the bulk of the compositional labour in terms of melody and harmony, but you need to learn to zoom in and out constantly: Does this melody, orchestration and text combination create a moment with a distinctive aesthetic and feeling (Think of Wagner’s leitmotifs, or Howard Shore’s themes in The Lord of the Rings)? Should this moment in the story reflect the essence of something important to the story? If it should, how can I then use this melody/text/image brought back in part or in whole, to evoke a relationship to this “essence”, such as character growth, a melancholic recapitulation, a new perspective on a past occurrence, etc… The music will not just capture the “thing”, but will tell your audience how to feel about it every time it comes back. You have to think of structure on many levels and find alignment. Finally, try to listen to what the text is telling you first, not necessarily what you want the text to say. Once I think I know what it says, I talk about it with my collaborator, to get clearer. I’m lucky to have someone who has a lot of depth to their intention, so making sure I understand it all first is very important. Then, we can discuss modifications more clearly and carefully.

BB : Kyle, you work in so many media (film & television, voice-over, opera, as writer as performer and also as promoter), if you could exert influence over the powers that run opera, what could they learn from those other media – businesses?  Should opera adapt and exploit modern media? And, If you had your way, what would the artform / business that we call “opera” do– either speaking of composers or of producers /companies– to make itself more attractive, more viable and more popular?

Kyle: Yes, I have many fingers in many pies (clearly it’s not only idle hands that are the devil’s workshop): theatre, music, audiobooks, digital media, film/television, events, and even a pair of startups – one in the AI space (to get it under control early) and the other in confectionary. 

Tenor Corey Arnold

I’m still learning and developing in all of them, but opera has something of a unique problem (perhaps Ballet shares this, but I’m not familiar enough to comment with any authority) and that is: we’re still being treated to Mozart, Verdi, Puccini, Wagner, and all the other greats from decades to hundreds of years ago. Very stiff competition for contemporary creatives. I know you and your readership have listened to me rant about this before, but it bears repeating: it’s not just that it’s Mozart, it’s that it’s done in languages very few Anglos speak, with untenable run times (I’m eyeing you in particular, Wagner), and with production choices crafted in the main around technical considerations (orchestra, fach, cut) rather than performative and storytelling ones. In this concert, we’re using microphones and, if I have my way, every future performance of any one of my operas will involve the use of amplification for the singers – I want every one of my words to be heard and understood, and I want every singer to be able to craft a spellbinding performance with the level dynamic range found in the recording studio.

BB: I know your words likely sound radical to some, but I am certain, were Richard Wagner himself still alive, he would say the same thing. I look at the way he covered the pit at Bayreuth as evidence that he knew enough to make adaptations & changes before the era of microphones. It’s ironic when purists get upset at such ideas, given that Wagner in his day was no purist. He was a revolutionary.

Kyle: The other issue is marketing: because the current opera audience knows all the major shows, marketing typically involves putting forward the conductor and the singers. For those who’ll see Don Giovanni 15 times (I am not one of them), this works because the conductor and singers are literally the only point of difference, and are therefore the attraction. For the rest of us  “normies” we just see a lot of people looking fancy, and have no idea what’s going on – especially since 90% of the titles of these operas are in languages that aren’t English. It’s a pretty high bar for involvement. However, I am happy to say that I’m seeing changes across the sector on this front as younger members of the industry have started to assert their influence, and I’m confident a lot of this is going to be almost entirely repaired before the next ten years are out. Just remember that Corey and I said it first! Ha!

Marketing. Companies need to focus on the story of the opera and – I’m going to say it again – do it in English (in the Anglosphere). They also need to show footage of the performance, which is always very difficult with live theatre. Stratford is doing an excellent job of this. Bigger companies have budgets and they can pull from past performances so there’s no excuses for them. If a clause needs to be added to artist contracts that material must be made available to the public, then so be it. The age of protectionism is over: if people can’t see it or hear it, they’re not going to care about it. Another thing companies can do is slot a few shoot days at the end of their season with the current company for promo material: the actors next season may not be the same, but there’s an allowance for that with some of these projects. Alternatively, if you have your ducks in a row early with casting, get the performers in to shoot the promo. The ultimate design of the show may change, but that’s not make or break.

In our case, because we don’t have any interesting looking footage for The Lion Heart, we’ve put together an animated trailer that lays out the story, aesthetic, and sound of our piece; we’ve been hearing that it’s really moving the needle for us, so I’m definitely happy about that.

I’ve been saying for years that opera will change you. As an impresario, it’s my duty to get as many obstacles out of the way as possible to facilitate that wondrous magic.

Corey: Only my closest friends know this, but during the pandemic, I was looking for work in other industries when I got hired for a small Canadian software company to assist their clients with using the software. Fast forward 4 years, and I now manage international accounts, travel to major international cities, and work as a developer for the same company. I also get to work alongside entrepreneurs with 20-30 years experience in developing and running companies, and soak up some of their experience. Working in this way was initially quite jarring: there is a tight relationship between my career advancement and my ability to produce value for their customers as mistakes and achievements often have direct financial consequences.

Composer and tenor Corey Arnold

In opera, we’ve lost that tight connection. To some extent we lose it because of ideological indulgences, such as the idea that market concerns are the enemy of art, (as if every composer of the last 400 years was completely free from market demands…) and we end up propped up by grants alone. But some of it is just a lack of business knowledge. I recall one entrepreneur saying to me “an idea doesn’t necessarily make a product, and a product doesn’t necessarily create a business”. When you translate this to opera, a cool musical or narrative idea doesn’t mean you have a great opera. And just because you have a great opera, doesn’t mean you have something of value to anybody. We need to understand that music is rarely ever evaluated strictly on some scale of musical merit (which we often forget in academia…). Performers are paid if the audience is interested in paying, and the audience’s perceived value of the performance can be more about their relationship with the venue or a single performer, or the visual effect onstage, than some quantitative analysis of the quality of the music & text. Business thinking and market demands can’t be a bad word anymore in opera, as they will open our minds to what our audience values. And if we get good at business, we’re going to be much happier on the whole.

BB: What other projects have you been working on.  

Kyle: Currently the quiver is filled with a lot of fun, unusual things! I’m narrating and engineering an audiobook called Ethandun for an American poet named William G. Carpenter, who’s written a delightful and moving epic poem about Alfred the Great converting the Danes to Christianity during the Danish invasion of England in the 9th century. We’re aiming for a December release. Want a copy of the book, or to hear the audiobook when it drops? Head to: https://williamgcarpenter.com/

Another project I’m working on (which is the complete opposite to Mr. Carpenter’s grave and reverential work) is a new play that I have the privilege of writing with Kids in the Hall star, Scott Thompson. We’re under strict NDA right now, so the details are limited, but I can share a few things: it’s called a Festive Special, and the logline is: Visionary theatre director Teddy Frisk loses his company after a controversial flop and makes a deal with the devil to get back on top. 

Yes, it’s a comedy and yes, it’s a Christmas show. Fingers crossed we’ll be seeing this on stage in December 2026.

Corey and I have been collaborating on our third opera together, Possession (the second is a cute pocket opera called The Bat & The Bells). A seductive tale of horror and exorcism, Possession is a new opera in English that follows the Nagy family in 19th C Hungary who is possessed by the demonic spirit of the infamous Countess Bathory, known for bathing in the blood of her victims in pursuit of eternal youth!

We’ve spoken to you about this before and ran a campaign to get signatures from audience members to bring to existing companies for a commission. If you, dear reader, want to add your name to the list and have your name immortalized in the first printed edition of the eventual score, go here.

This will also put you on our mailing list which we ONLY USE when promoting an upcoming performance, or when sending an update about the opera.

For everything else, my instagram and website are the best places to stay abreast.

Corey: I’ve been performing regularly around Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, etc… but have also been working on better connections abroad, having done my first tour of China last fall. My wife, Nadia Boucher (a pianist), and I have lots of energy and interests, so we always have a variety of projects running at any given time.

Kyle and Corey: Thank you, Leslie, for your craft and patience; it’s always an honour!

Kyle Derek McDonald | Corey Arnold.
Follow them here:

Kyle: Instagram | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube | Websites Mightier Productions | Kyle Derek

Corey: Instagram | Facebook | LinkedIn | Website

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Interviews, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Far Side of the Moon takes us into Robert Lepage

If you are a fan of theatrical presentations, brilliant design and innovative stage techniques you must get a ticket to see Far Side of the Moon by Robert Lepage / Ex Machina at the Bluma Appel Theatre until November 16th. I don’t know if Canadian Stage will be able to extend the run, but this is a show that people will be talking about for a long time.

You may know Robert Lepage as an innovator, a brilliant designer, known for collaborations with everyone from the Metropolitan Opera to Cirque du Soleil and Peter Gabriel. He simultaneously offers grand spectacle and quirky glimpses of human vulnerability.

Olivier Normand plays all the parts in a show that Lepage played himself when it first appeared in 2000. Once again we see autobiographical elements, as we saw with Needles & Opium, Eonnagata and especially 887.

Two estranged brothers are brought together by the death of their mother. Normand plays both brothers, the mother and her doctor too.

The synopsis from the Ex Machina website says:

The Far Side of the Moon is based on the tempestuous relationship between two brothers with perfectly opposed ambitions, and on the improbable reconciliation caused by the death of their mother. As a backdrop, the Russian-American moon race of the 1960s, where the losers may not be the ones we imagine.
There is a sometimes thin line between the trivial and the sublime. Here, visual poetry allows the central character, Philippe, to pass from the banality of everyday life to the majesty of the spatial world, to escape the earth’s force of attraction for the lightness of the sidereal void.

While both brothers look up into the sky their approaches couldn’t be more different.

Philippe is an introverted astronomy student whose dissertation concerned Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935) the Russian rocket scientist who has been called the father of space flight. and who conceived of the space elevator, an idea that’s closer to science fiction than fact.

Philippe drawing a schematic diagram to explain Tsiolkovsky’s space elevator. (photo from Ex Machina website, in an earlier production)

His brother André, is a successful television weatherman. 

Olivier Normand as André the television weatherman (Photo: Elana Emer)

The two brothers are brought together by banal details arising from the death of their mother. What about the contents of her room? What will become of Beethoven: her goldfish? As Ex Machina told us, there is a sometimes thin line between the trivial and the sublime.

As a son who recently lost his mom and spent much of the past year going through her possessions, trying to decide what to keep as memento and what to donate or give away, this part of the story has a blunt edge that spoke to me with great clarity, right on that thin line between trivia and sublimity. I. found myself a bit astonished trying to reconcile two parts of Lepage. Sometimes he is a reticent symbolist, encouraging a poetic response while keeping us at a distance. At other times he is painfully real, and very funny. One brother has a practical relationship with the sky, making money from it, while the other engages in impractical research that is more obscure or avant-garde, likely reflecting the two sides of Lepage or any artist for that matter. We are not seeing objective figures but rather through the filter of one or the other brother’s perspective, as when we see the mother holding a baby-sized astronaut.

The symbolist side is fed by the imagery, an approach to stagecraft seen over and over in Lepage’s work. The set for Far Side of the Moon is like a trial run for the opera designs for Berlioz’s Damnation of Faust and the Wagner Ring cycle.

In the Berlioz we get an enormous set of squares dividing the stage picture, allowing for projection and division of the performance area. That’s similar to what Lepage and Ex Machina did in Far Side of the Moon, inserting one recurring motif into the stage picture as a departure point for the visual story-telling. A laundromat washing machine door doubles for orbital technology, the same shape doing double-duty to stimulate our imaginations, while the actor or puppets go in or out of that portal.

Philippe in the laundromat (photo from Ex Machina website, in an earlier production)
Olivier Normand as the mother (Photo: Li Wang)

Far Side of the Moon is an economical design when compared to the massive architecture in the Met operas or the Macbeth we saw this past summer at the Stratford Festival. But even on this smaller scale Lepage & Ex Machina enact the same thing as in the Ring cycle, where the set is a model for a world that is completely flexible, changed in radical ways at unexpected moments. And I must also mention that Lepage conceives of his actor (originally played by Lepage himself) as another changeable and ambiguous component like the set, representing everyone. It’s mind-altering and druggy in the best way.

Lepage again employs video to offer secondary viewpoints of something onstage, in addition to the use of a big mirrored surface onstage. As in 887 or Macbeth the video can be very subtle. Sometimes the reflections may confound our expectations & perspectives, as if to suggest being in orbit.

Watching the trailer for the film Lepage made in 2003 from the play, I only wish I had seen that before the show, as it illuminates several interesting connections, underlining moments in the play that went over my head. Now I have to get a copy of the film.

In the final sequence of the play Lepage makes something magical, hinted at briefly in the film trailer, with the help of the mirrored surface onstage, a hauntingly beautiful suggestion of weightless ballet. The musical score created originally by Laurie Anderson is a stunning feature of the show, sometimes in the background but foregrounded in the set piece that concludes the play.

Olivier Normand as Philippe (Photo: Li Wang)

Far Side of the Moon by Robert Lepage / Ex Machina continues at the Bluma Appel Theatre until November 16th. Don’t miss it.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Mikado worthy of revisit

I took Erika to see the Toronto Operetta Theatre’s The Mikado Revisited at the Jane Mallett Sunday afternoon, wanting to escape from the world. Other than the usual topical jokes (and what’s Gilbert & Sullivan without references to current events) we were in an altered reality with a different prime minister. Guillermo Silva-Marin’s new version removed the Japanese references from the Mikado, reframing the story in a Canadian context.

What a great feeling when high expectations of a show are satisfied.

First and foremost I should mention the contribution of Narmina Afandiyeva conducting the TOT orchestra, helping everyone sound beautiful while keeping soloists and chorus tightly together throughout.

Narmina Afandiyeva

I had already been thoroughly blown away by her excellent pianism a few months ago in the last Apocryphonia concert, so it was no surprise to see what an excellent conductor she was in her TOT debut.

Our revised story veered between romance and comedy, still thoroughly topsy-turvy in Guillermo’s new Ontario adaptation of the story. I giggled to myself, recalling the Stratford Macbeth with bikers, jeans & leather with nary a kilt in sight, while now the kimonos were gone in favour of, what else, kilts in this incarnation.

The Lord High Executioner (Greg Finney), Katty Kat (Karen Bojti), the Prime Minister (Stuart Graham), and kilts.

The romance between Yum-Yum (Madeline Cooper) and Nanki-Blue (Marcus Tranquilli) was as charming as ever.

I spoke of my expectations. I came with the intention to laugh, grateful for the comic stylings of The Lord High Executioner (Greg Finney), who happens to be a superb singer as well.

Greg met his match in Karen Bojti, playing the unruly contralto who always throws everything into turmoil upon her disruptive arrival, with a big voice, strong presence and perfect comic timing. Whenever Greg or Karen were onstage there was always something funny afoot.

Revised, revisited, we still had the boisterous happy ending.

TOT will be back with
TOT Cabaret: Viva La Zarzuela on November 29th, and later
Kalman’s Czardas Princess December 30, Jan 2, 3 and 4.

Click for further info and tickets.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment