Naomi’s Road: an opera about a shameful moment in Canada’s history

Michael Mori, Artistic director of Tapestry Opera posted the following on Facebook (the press release follows immediately below):

When we started planning Naomi’s Road, a show deals with the shameful treatment of Japanese-Canadians during WWII, it was well before Trump’s campaigning for president took fear politics to the next level. Now more than ever, it is relevant that we remember the good and the bad sides of our own history. With the incidence of violence against Muslims (or simply those perceived as Muslims) increasing in Canada and the US, we cannot ignore the rhetoric that calls any one ethnicity or religion evil and unwelcome. We have been through that before with Japanese Canadians and others. This coming February is the 75th anniversary of a law that stripped Japanese-Canadians of their homes, welfare, and possessions, and sent them away from their homes to live in camps,… a legalized crime that saw some die and created an entire generation of publicly shamed Canadians of a visible minority.

I so admire the bravery of Joy Kogawa in telling her story and in using art and literature to remind us of the human context of fear politics. This show is a truly beautiful and inspiring show because it tells the human story of survival and reenforces the need to remember mistakes made. Now as ever it is vital that we remember… so that something like this could never happen again in Canada.

Joy herself will be reading from her book after the show on opening night. Join us then (Nov 16th) or for any of the other nights for a powerful show.

~~~~~~~

Tickets on Sale Now for the Toronto Premiere of
Naomi’s Road

 Based on a best-selling novel by Joy Kogawa,
this opera is a moving account of a definitive moment in Canada’s history

 Toronto, ON: Canada’s leading contemporary opera company, Tapestry Opera, launches its ground-breaking 37th season with the Toronto premiere of Naomi’s Road. Set in Vancouver during the Second World War, Naomi’s Road follows a young Japanese-Canadian girl’s journey from Vancouver to an internment camp in the BC interior. Performances run from Nov. 16 – 20, 2016 at St. David’s Anglican Church, a location of deep cultural significance, as it is the home of the last Japanese-Canadian Anglican parish in Toronto located at 49 Donlands Ave.

Naomi’s Road was adapted in 2004 from a novel by Joy Kogawa, accomplished librettist and director Ann Hodges along with acclaimed composer Ramona Luengen. Drawing from Kogawa’s own harrowing experience. Featuring an all-Canadian cast and creative team, Naomi’s Road premiered with the Vancouver Opera over a decade ago and has toured British Columbia and Alberta, championing a generation of Asian-Canadian operatic talent.

Directed by Tapestry Opera’s Artistic Director Michael Hidetoshi Mori (the opera’s first Japanese-Canadian director), the cast features two performers from the original cast, including tenor Sam Chung as Stephen, Naomi’s musical younger brother, and baritone Sung Taek Chung as Daddy, along with soprano Hiather Darnel-Kadonaga as 9-year-old Naomi and mezzo-soprano Erica Iris Huang as Mother/Obasan.

“It is a true honour to have worked with Joy to bring this important story to Toronto for the first time ever,” says Mori. “In a time when certain factions in Canada and the US are reacting to the fear of terrorism with xenophobia and the call for exclusionary and divisive laws, Naomi’s Road is a keen reminder of the human impact of these biases and policies. We must learn from the mistakes of internment camps and ensure this history does not repeat itself. As always, it is the braveness of children, in this case Naomi, that reminds us of our universal humanity.”

Tickets are now available online at Tapestry Opera’s official website or by calling DeeAnn Sagar at (416) 537-6066, ext. 243. Tickets – $35, Student & Youth Tickets – $25.

ABOUT NAOMI’S ROAD

Librettist Ann Hodges and composer Ramona Luengen wrote the piece in 2004. In September 2004, the libretto was read at an event at the Gulf of Georgia Cannery National Historical Site in Steveston, the site of the 1942 seizure of hundreds of fishing boats owned by Japanese Canadians. Workshops followed, with a May 2005 excerpt performance at the annual OPERA America conference and at the 2005 UBC-Laurier Institution Multiculturalism Lecture in Vancouver. This work has gone on to tour with Vancouver Opera to schools throughout British Columbia and with Opera Nuova to schools and communities throughout Alberta.

ABOUT TAPESTRY OPERA

Tapestry Opera is a Toronto-based company that creates and produces opera from the heart of here and now. For over 36 years, the company has presented award-winning works by preeminent artists, brought to life by some of the most talented and versatile performers of the contemporary stage. As Canada’s leader in opera development, Tapestry Opera is committed to cultivating new creators and performers to serve the evolution of the art form and build a lasting Canadian repertoire. Tapestry Opera alumni include Ann-Marie MacDonald, Atom Egoyan, James Rolfe, Marjorie Chan and Nic Gotham.

Tapestry Opera continues to drive the evolution of opera with an innovative 37th season, which includes the world premiere of Oksana G., May 24 – 30, 2017 at the Imperial Oil Opera Theatre; and the annual Songbook VII on Feb 23 & 24, 2017 at the Ernest Balmer Studio.

www.tapestryopera.com

@TAPESTRYOPERA

facebook.com/TapestryOpera

#NAOMISROAD

 

 

 

 

Posted in Opera, Politics, Press Releases and Announcements | Leave a comment

TSO exhibit Elfman – Burton brilliance

While there are still two months left in 2016 I am pretty sure that I just saw the best concert of the year, and I didn’t see it coming.  At the intermission I was musing to myself that I had already had the best experience of the year in half of the program.  The Toronto Symphony played their hearts out today, conducted by Ted Sperling.  I have it on good authority (a chat with freelancer Megan Hodge afterwards), that while this may have been more playing than expected it was very enjoyable for the players.

The title was ”Danny Elfman’s Music from the films of Tim Burton”.  While we were watching a concert of live music, there are credits listing a good 30-40 people in this complex production.  Music from fifteen different films were featured (seven numbers on either side of the intermission):

  • Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
  • Pee-wee’s Big Adventure
  • Beetlejuice
  • Sleepy Hollow
  • Mars Attacks
  • Big Fish
  • Batman / Batman Returns
    intermission
  • Planet of the Apes
  • Tim Burton’s Corpse Bride
  • Dark Shadows
  • Frankenweenie
  • Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas
  • Edward Scissorhands
  • Alice in Wonderland

How busy is Elfman? He was performing at the Hollywood Bowlposter this weekend.  So in other words, unfortunately he wasn’t in Toronto for these performances because he was part of an in-concert version of Nightmare before Christmas.

Our concert featured a brilliant new concept, or at least a concept that’s new to me, that will likely be imitated.  Any composer seeking to improve understanding of their work couldn’t do better than what we saw, in some ways resembling one of those extra tracks you watch on a DVD after you’ve seen the movie.  But it’s particularly powerful for a kind of greatest-hits compilation.  It was most successful for those moments when everyone in the hall had already seen the film, or to put it more personally, it was totally amazing for those films I’ve seen.

Imagine this template for each film:

  • Show the title of the film on a slide
  • Begin playing the music for that film
  • Show a little bit of the film
  • Show Tim Burton’s conceptual drawings
  • Show an abstract still slide, while we get lost in the music

Occasionally the drawings & the film-sample were reversed. Sometimes we saw more of the film than other times.  But for most of these films, we were invited into a reverie, recalling the film while we listened to Elfman’s creations.

The credit in today’s program said “Music Composed & arranged by Danny Elfman”.  Many of the films feature segments that sound quite different from the version in the film (I was going to call it “the original” but I’m not sure that would be accurate).   I mention this because Elfman might be the Rodney Dangerfield of film music composers. Yes he’s been nominated but he’s never won an Academy Award, even though his sound is hugely influential, meaning that I could cite composers who have imitated Elfman, composers who have their little gold statuette even though they’re not as good.  I say that with hesitation, only because I don’t want to criticize anyone. But Elfman surely deserves an Academy Award by now.  But then again they regularly get the other awards wrong, so why should this category be any different?

The TSO seem to have noticed how popular film music has become.  Not only are they programming films with live accompaniment (last year: Vertigo, Psycho and Back to the Future, while this season they’re presenting more than ever before), but they’re also giving us the music, as in today’s concert, and in an upcoming concert by Itzhak Perlman when we’ll hear some of his splendid cinematic serenades November 22nd.

This concert had a large number of children present, and a very young average age.  Discussing this observation with my seat-mate (the lady who made the observation, not me, and a former TSO subscriber btw), she couldn’t help asking aloud “where will the opera or the TSO get their future subscribers?”  And of course we were looking at the answer to her question, a good strategy for finding new young listeners, namely in such creative programming.

There’s so much I can say about this program (does liking perhaps means it triggers my gab reflex?), I’ll try not to go on too long.

32738sm

Composer Danny Elfman

Elfman’s vocabulary is hugely original, something I say again recalling that he hasn’t yet won an Oscar even though he’s been imitated.

I’m thinking about Elfman’s use of chorus in so many films, while appreciating the performance by Toronto’s Orpheus Choir today.  The choral sounds, sometimes wordless (singing “loo loo loo”?), sometimes unintelligible text, put me in mind of earlier Symbolist uses of chorus.  I think it begins with Debussy’s wordless chorus in Sirènes (1898), where the voices suggest not just the Sirens who threatened ships, but Nature itself (and listening to this I’m inclined to say “Herself”).  Ravel jumps in with Daphnis et Chloe, the voices suggestive but ambiguous.  Philip Glass did this too with his ensemble, in the last quarter of the 20th century.  Elfman then picks up the thread.

Whether or not you get the chorus, Elfman also has chorale-like sounds from his orchestras, at times solemn, verging on something between religion and spirituality.  The scenes in the last half-hour of Batman in that old church are a chilling suggestion of I’m not sure what, but it’s certainly not the old-fashioned religion or any kind of piety.  Those chords that we hear there, or in the latter part of Beetlejuice when a kind of ritual is enacted bringing back the dead, are now standard equipment for the invocation of a certain solemnity, and by that I mean that many other composers imitate this kind of music.

I have to wonder, after seeing the audience burst into spontaneous applause at the slide announcing Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas, when is someone going to adapt this material as a musical? and when you look at the poster above –for the concert in Los Angeles this weekend–clearly these songs are well-loved.  The cast includes Catherine O’Hara, but she’s there, not here.  Yes Elfman displayed his melodic gift all night, but when we came to this one, there was such a richness on offer, that some songs were left out, or barely heard. Yes someone has to figure out how to present the visuals of the animated film.  With actors? With puppets?  I wish someone would finally do it.

Posted in Cinema, video & DVDs, Music and musicology, Reviews | Leave a comment

All But Gone

When you’re ushered into the chapel for a wedding, sometimes they ask you “bride or groom?” That’s to identify where you should sit.

I was thinking of that quaint custom as I came into the Berkeley Street theatre tonight for All But Gone, a fascinating hybrid presented by Canadian Stage & Necessary Angel. When they ask which side of the church are you sitting on, meaning are you sitting with the family of the bride or family of the groom, you don’t usually expect that everyone there is from one family and you’re all alone on the other side. But I could have sworn everyone there tonight was from Beckett’s family (meaning the spoken word/ drama side) rather than the opera- sung side, where i hang my hat. I listened afterwards to a fellow all charged up about what was done wrong, how they shouldn’t have been looking at us in the audience, that the instructions in the text are very clear  (oh yes he knew his Beckett) that you can’t do it that way.

So of course when Krisztina Szabo and Shannon Mercer came out behind us, singing first quietly then more loudly & not entirely intelligibly, I wondered how he’d take that. Yet it appears that this will be a happy marriage, so long as the two families let go of their prejudices and really meet in the middle.  Many in attendance were clearly open to the experience, welcoming the blending of styles.

MJ-hi-res

Canadian Stage’s Matthew Jocelyn

As I’ve observed many times over the past few years, Matthew Jocelyn has dedicated himself & his company to inter-disciplinary explorations. The program says “All But Gone by Samuel Beckett, then “a new adaptation by Jennifer Tarver”.

tarver

Director & adapter Jennifer Tarver of Necessary Angel Theatre Company

They list four Beckett plays (Act Without Words I & II, Play and Ohio Impromptu). The next two lines say “Featuring Viderunt Omnes by Garrett Sholdice and From the Grammar of Dreams by Kaija Saariaho.” If you come from the musical side you might focus on those featured items, while the Beckett aficionadi would be really intent on the four plays.

I love the fact that I didn’t know what to make of it. For me that’s the element truest to the spirit of Beckett. One of the things I love about him is how open he is (in the sense of Eco’s Opera aperta or “Open Work”), rather than overly determined. These are plays that sit outside the boundary of genres, sometimes invoking laughter, sometimes a darker response. There are many ways that his works can be staged.

I came in a bit fearfully, recalling something Mallarmé had said; when he heard that Debussy had set his “Afternoon of a Faun” to music, the poet more or less said “I thought I already did that”. So too with Beckett, who is already musical in his choice of words. I had thought I was about to see and hear Beckett set to music, which is not at all what this is, thank goodness.

So excuse me if I sound a bit academic for a moment, as I talk about what this hybrid thing is and how it works. When we name it we sometimes help the reception process, but sometimes we strangle it by closing off options or misleading the audience. The dramaturgy question is endlessly fascinating and always useful, I believe.

Tarver’s combination reminds me of several things.

  • I could invoke the model of the musical, where the words go as far as they can until music is necessary. I don’t think that’s really what we had this time, but it’s at least a recognizable template.
  • I woke up today, again, with Ariodante’s da capo lament “Scherza infida” in my head, a Handel melody that haunts me in the best way. I came into the theatre sensitized to the old baroque dynamic that tends to split the heavy lifting between recitative and aria, between words to advance action or music to express emotion. Opera may have moved to newer means of expression in recent centuries, yet there we were, relying upon those age-old methods. The men were making speeches or performing actions. The women sang, taking us deeper into the irrational realms of emotion that music can make available.  The men were distant, cold and opaque while the women were among us and radiant. With this dynamic i couldn’t help feeling that Tarver’s hybrid was attempting to warm up Beckett, make him more human, particularly when i heard the words “jubilate deo”, in the Sholdice composition. Would Beckett have approved? Hm he couldn’t be reached for comment.
  • We could speak too of the way theatres or vaudeville would present several attractions, as suggested by Tarver’s use of the word “featuring”, a word that has a very nice resonance for me, and doesn’t imply that one medium is more important than another.  I think Brecht, too, would have liked this very well, for the way we were in a very sane & respectful place. All But Gone doesn’t have to be understood as a single work with a through-line and progression, so much as four plays with musical interludes. You find the highlights depending on what appeals to you (and depending also on which family you belong to).
  • The eclectic blend of different elements (I am tempted to use the word “pastiche” in the sense of a messy mixture) means that the tonal qualities we get are all over the map, which is only a problem if you show up with stipulations, like that fellow sitting in front of me. The ambiguities of this text are deliciously unresolved, requiring a high tolerance for ambiguity. At times we were in a minimalist place, the unaccompanied music a perfect match for the understated texts in the Beckett.

The main thing is that it works. I’d like to see more such hybrids, to see what can be accomplished in mixing together unlikely ingredients, a worthwhile experiment.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Music and musicology, Opera, Reviews | Leave a comment

That other Aeneas and Dido story

It was a funny coincidence. When I ran into David Fallis the other day –an encounter I mentioned in my recent review of Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas—I showed him a DVD I was returning to the library, the Fura del Baus version of Berlioz’s opera Les Troyens. At one point I thought of putting a headline on it of “La Fura del Baus vs Berlioz”.

I used the DVD to illustrate new approaches to opera in a recent class. After talking about new opera texts from Tapestry, Canadian Stage, Fawn Opera and Soundstreams (to name a few), I went on about adventurous stagings of existing operas. And so we pulled up Tcherniakov (watching some of his Wozzeck), Lepage (his Ring operas), Bieito (that famous gangsters on toilets shot) and still shots from the Against the Grain Mozart-da Ponte transladaptation cycle (ha: autocorrect doesn’t believe “transladaptation” is a word, imagine that!).

61ub9e9ixnl-_sl1024_

One of the most exciting demonstrations was to make head-to-head comparisons in class between different versions of the same scene. We compared two different videos of the Zeffirelli Pagliacci, (Zef being our touchstone for conservative fidelity to a text) first Domingo then Pavarotti, both opposite Teresa Stratas as Nedda. We did a very different sort of head to head, comparing the old 1980s Met Troyens to the Gergiev production from the Fura dels Baus collective, known for their aerials and adventurous design. If you were looking for a textbook illustration of the good and bad of director’s theatre, of the ridiculous and the risible in Regietheater, have a look at this DVD.  There are some startlingly good moments alongside others that are at least puzzling if not aggravating.

1195458

Les Troyens (Photo GVA)

Here’s how La Fura dels Baus describe themselves on their website

La Fura dels Baus is eccentricity, innovation, adaptation, rhythm, evolution and transgression. Such characteristic and unique essence led the company to pioneer the reconceptualization of two of the most significant aspects of the dramatic art: the theatrical space and the public. Thus, respectively, they redefined the space by moving it to non-conventional ones – and changed the public role from passive to active, which meant a breaking of the “fourth wall”. And it is that there is no creation without risk – a compiled premise from the beginning, since their first street shows, where the authentic essence of La Fura was born.
The incessant curiosity and the need to explore new artistic trends have developed, through a process of collective creation, a unique language, style and aesthetic. Nowadays, this is called “Furan language”, which has been implemented in different artistic genres, such as opera, cinema and large-scale performances.
The ability to bind and adapt carnality and mysticism, nature and artifice, rudeness and sophistication, primitivism and technology, in every performance, has given La Fura dels Baus its international success and prestige.

Notice that instead of a Trojan Horse, they have something they’d identify as a virus. It’s a very modern understanding, unsentimental.  The images in this little video (rehearsals) give you a glimpse of how radical they can be.

I will let others judge whether they are truly influential or derivative. That is not a question I can answer and I am not sure such questions are or were ever answerable. We tend to understand Mozart as genius & inspiration, not necessarily admitting influences,  the many things he must have seen and absorbed from his milieu &  his contemporaries: who are no longer heard. I am less interested in “who thought of it” (that over-rated question of originality) than in understanding questions such as “how does it work” (dramaturgy) and “how does it feel” (reception).

We’re in a very different kind of story from what we saw in that Met production that stars Tatiana Troyanos as Dido and Jessye Norman as Cassandre. The scene I chose to explore and highlight differences of approach was the Act I celebratory ballet and subsequent pantomime. The old version is actually danced, a group of dancers looking exceptionally manly. The new version erects a boxing ring, across which we see women strut to announce round 1 or 2, while the pugilists go at it. It’s time for a celebration, which is supposed to be fun, right?  While it’s not precisely solemn, the mood makes a ton of sense. It’s been modernized to a kind of space-station setting, involving costumes resembling a sci-fi hockey league.

The subsequent pantomime is one of the unforgettable scenes of the opera, where Andromache and her son come out, suddenly damping the joy of the (supposedly) victorious Trojans, reminded of the recent death of their great hero Hector, Andromache’s husband. In the older production the boy carries his father’s helmet, while the mother’s grief is larger than life, and I challenge anyone with a heart not to get a bit teary eyed watching it. In the new one the boy steers his toy car, more or less oblivious to the solemnities (see it briefly at roughly the 23rd second of this little excerpt, right after we see that boxing ring).

Yes it might be realistic, but it begs the question. Are we no longer permitted to enjoy the rapture of visuals and music that are in harmony? Is a big opera so suspect as a fascist apparatus, so dangerous that we must deconstruct it and even mock the story we’re telling? That’s how it feels much of the time.

And yet the production has its rewards, and its critique of the opera has merit.  When Dido and Aeneas sing their great Act IV duet “Nuit d’ivresse”, they are each suspended in the air, only meeting for a little kiss at the end, reminiscent of the solipsistic humans in Wall-E.

Considering that this has at times been one of my absolute favourite texts to play and (attempt to) sing, it’s especially hard to face something verging on parody, mocking my beloved duet.   Yet considering the text they are singing –as each talks on and on about the great loves of history, infatuated less with their partner than with the poetry of this moment—they could be in separate carrels in a university research library, for all the real intimacy of their duet. They are in love with the idea of their great love, the greatest love story ever written. And so the staging is a brilliant critique anticipating much of what Berlioz seems to inspire, oxymoronic approaches to staging that seem to recoil away from real life.

The moment when Aeneas describes the death of Laocoon is shown with gory detail, as is the mass suicide that ends Act II. Those two moments emerge out of the cool surface of the production to have a powerful impact. Hylas’s little Act V lullaby is a sad version of Space Oddity, as the sailor tells us of his homesickness, floating above a spinning planet, except Major Hylas doesn’t drift away mysteriously. When Aeneas announces the departure from Carthage, we get a rocket launched, a nice visual. Yes I was impressed with the technology and the beautiful images, but no I wasn’t moved much of the time, or if I was –as in “nuit d’ivresse”—it was with the intellectual justification for their clever vandalism.

As far as the singing is concerned, Canadian Lance Ryan shows great promise as Aeneas. I hope we hear him singing in Canada while he still has a voice, but right now it’s a formidable talent. Elisabete Matos gives Cassandre a passion that resembles something approaching madness, and is the most vividly human thing in the whole opera, making her death doubly tragic. Daniela Barcellona has a luscious sound as Dido, often hanging from wires in the production, in typical Fura dels Baus fashion.

Their final needling question for Berlioz at the end puts Dido onto a virtual pyre, dying above pictures of fire on a myriad of laptops. Is that so odd, though, when this opera is so firmly concerned with what’s written and spoken about the characters, a self-conscious collection of heroes living out their larger than life myths?

In a world where we are less and less living authentic lives and more and more sinking into our devices, this is a fascinating take on the ancient story.   I recommend this video with the huge caveat, that you be certain you’re clear about how you feel about the distance this production offers from the romantic approach seen in productions such as the Met production from the 1980s. Valery Gergiev’s conducting is itself almost worth the price, as he moves things at a fabulous pace. Earlier generations have sometimes let Berlioz be too slow, even lugubrious, but that’s not what you get here. And the images are always stimulating, thought provoking and occasionally heart-breaking.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Opera, Reviews | 1 Comment

Ariodante questions

My second time through the Canadian Opera Company’s Ariodante yesterday raised more questions in my mind.

There are the vocal questions, ones that aren’t new.  I have long wondered about the way we perceive operatic performance, that a perfect performance is sometimes less sympathetic than one that shows more of a struggle.  I used to contrast Maria Callas and Joan Sutherland in this regard, that one singer’s vocal production was itself a drama, compared to the other, who never seemed to have a struggle creating the sound.  I don’t want to add any layers of judgment to this, as I am not even sure I am reading this correctly, but some timbres and/or interpretive approaches work better for some roles than others.

But some of the singers in the COC Ariodante sang a performance that was mostly free of drama, while others made their vocalization another layer of the interpretation.

Jane Archibald as Ginevra is at the centre of the story, singing Handel with a near-perfect approach to every phrase, an ease that reminded me of Joan Sutherland.  There was never a moment when I wondered whether she could sing the part, never a phrase that seemed difficult. That effortless style is perhaps a good match for her role, as the innocent princess blind-sided by slander: plus a mysterious liquid someone slips into her drink.

16-17-02-MC-D-0907

Alice Coote as Ariodante (photo: Michael Cooper)

I would contrast her delivery sharply with that of her betrothed, Ariodante, as portrayed by Alice Coote.  They’re not only in different vocal categories of course but portraying different genders.   Yet Coote undertakes something very different.  In her coloratura she lets her emotions show, so that when she’s distraught, the notes almost seem to overwhelm her. When she sings her long lament “Scherza infida” –the moment I would call the musical highlight of the performance yesterday –we hear a great variety of sounds.  The passions of the character seem to be having their way with Ariodante.  And later when supposedly celebrating the upcoming happy resolution, Coote offers something very subtle and profound, in the aria “Dopo notte, atra e funesta”.  It’s usually the signal of the reversal of fortunes and signal of a happy ending to come.

But there are some significant differences in this production, as I noted in my earlier review.

And so both Ginevra and Ariodante have some very complex emotions as they come to the final numbers.  With Coote I am reminded of something we don’t see so much anymore: the use of a timbre to signal something complex and ambiguous.   I remember singers such as Maria Callas or Cesare Valetti creating a sense of sadness or melancholy within a single note.  While the music seemed to signal a happy resolution, Coote’s voice said something very different.

Ambur Braid as Dalinda also ventured into this dangerous territory, a wonderfully vulnerable portrayal, while her voice dared to risk all in her stratospheric ventures.

And then there’s the question of the story itself, a tale that might seem anti-feminist if not misogynistic in its enactment.  One woman is abused, while an innocent one is jailed.  Modernizing the story –as the production does in its setting—puts a curious sort of pressure on it.  Instead of placing Ginevra in a medieval prison, remote from the others while awaiting the outcome of the trial combat and therefore alone with her misery, she’s under a kind of house arrest in her bedroom.  As a result there are additional horrors in the community censure she experiences, strongly altering the way she experiences her father’s judgment.  Where we might roll our eyes at the rigidity of the old story, we can’t ignore the way it plays in the newer context, and therefore may sense the inevitability of the outcome we get in this production.

EXPORT_Sylvain_Bergeron_(color2)Sylvain photo by Didier Bertrand

Sylvain Bergeron (photo by Didier Bertrand)

During the curtain calls I recognized a familiar face, namely Sylvain Bergeron playing lute among the cellists, earning them special recognition at the end and deservedly so.  Johannes Debus and the COC Orchestra sound marvelous playing this Handel score.  I’m delighted to see that almost every remaining performance of Norma and Ariodante seem to be sold out. And no wonder.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Leave a comment

Fourth Annual Elizabeth Krehm Memorial Concert

Monday November 14 at 7:30pm at Metropolitan United Church
Tickets & information

Elizabeth Krehm passed away on November 17, 2012 in the ICU at St Michael’s Hospital. elizabeth_krehmEvery year since her passing, her family has held a memorial concert as a fundraiser for St Michael’s ICU. About $40,000 has been rasied through these concerts. Elizabeth’s family will be ever grateful for the wonderful care received by the doctor’s nurses and social workers at St Mike’s.

Fourth Annual Elizabeth Krehm Memorial will be held on Monday November 14 at 7:30pm at Metropolitan United Church (56 Queen St E)

Admission by donation at the door. Suggested minimum donation of $20. 100% of donations collected will be donated to St Mike’s ICU. For more information please call 647-248-4048.

This year we open the program with Yosuke Kawasaki and Jessica Linnenbach, Concert Master and Associate Concertmaster of the Nation Arts Centre Orchestra, playing Bach’s Concert for two violins. This piece was one that Elizabeth studied as a violinist. Rachel Krehm, Elizabeth’s sister, will sing arias and songs by Mozart, Dvorak and Strauss. The concert will end with Beethoven’s epic third symphony. Evan Mitchell leads Canzona Chamber Players Orchestra.

Program:

Concerto for two Violins in D minor BWV 1043 Johann Sebastian Bach
Come scoglio from Così fan tutte K 588 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Song to the Moon from Rusalka Antonin Dvorak
Morgen op. 27 no 4 Richard Strauss

Intermission

Symphony No 3 Ludwig van Beethoven

Evan Mitchell, conductor
Yosuke Kawasaki, violin
Jessica Linnebach, violin
Rachel Krehm, soprano

Canzona Chamber Players Orchestra

Tickets & information

Posted in Press Releases and Announcements | Leave a comment

JAMES BOND: A Convenient Lie (Opera in Pasticcio)

MALFI PRODUCTIONS in collaboration with MANOSINISTRA LYRIC WORKSHOPS present:
 
Ian Fleming’s
JAMES BOND: A Convenient Lie
(Opera in Pasticcio)
Libretto by Kyle McDonald
 
Saturday November 12, 2016 – 8pm
BETTY OLIPHANT THEATRE
(National Ballet School)
404 Jarvis St., Toronto, CANADA
 
Bond, James Bond, Agent 007 is given his next assignment at MI6. His mission? To save humanity and thwart the evil plot of The Naturalist who vows to save the planet and restore Nature to her pre-eminence. MALFI PRODUCTIONS and MANOSINISTRA have assembled a stellar cast and chorus to bring Kyle McDonald’s new libretto to life in this semi-staged concert “vernissage” inPasticcio featuring well know music from Mozart, Verdi, Donizetti, Puccini, Bizet and more!
STARRING:
JAMES BOND – Kyle McDonald | THE NATURALIST – Stuart Graham | PIERRE LECLÉ – Amelia Daigle“AUDREY” LECLÉ – Jennifer Ann Sullivan | TINYConstantine MeglisSALVATORE – Rocco Rupolo | BLISS – Holly Chaplin | QDiego Catalá | MONEYPENNY – Alexandra Harris
 
CHORUS:
Karen Barrett | Alexandra Harris | Mathilde Contat-Federico | Julie Clarke | Martha Spence | Andrew Lorimer | Barry St-Denis | Martin Georgievski | Connor Glossop
 
PIANIST:
SASHA BULT-ITO
For artist bios, please visit  http://www.malfiproductions.com/james-bond
BOX OFFICE | TICKETS
DISCOUNTED ADVANCE ONLINE TICKETS
SINGLE: $36.50
BRING-A-DATE (2 tickets): $65
AT THE DOOR (CASH ONLY)
SINGLE: $40
For full program information or box office assistance, please contact MALFI PRODUCTIONS AT:
If you are unable to view the poster below, you may view in your browser by click on http://www.malfiproductions.com/james-bond
_____________________________________________________________

*******

“Press releases and announcements” are presented verbatim without comment.

 

Posted in Press Releases and Announcements | Leave a comment

Opera Atelier creates a new Dido and Aeneas

Opera Atelier and Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas go back a long way. This was the opera with which they began, thirty years ago.

But this is not the same opera. Tonight we saw a new creation unveiled, an expanded version of the great English opera.

resized_sailors

From Dido and Aeneas, 2005. (Photo: Bruce Zinger)

I had the good fortune to run into David Fallis, Opera Atelier’s Music Director & conductor,  a couple of days ago at the Edward Johnson Building.  David spoke with quiet excitement about the upcoming dress rehearsal, the expanded work with the children’s chorus that might have some resonances with that first known performance at a girl’s school of 1689.

And so I paid particular attention to David’s notes in the program, where he gives the most useful commentary of anyone on the team or so it felt to me. That’s scarcely surprising considering that in most opera productions the conductor functions as a kind of dramaturg, having final say on which bar of music is or is not included, although it might also be due to his other roles as Artistic Director of Toronto Consort, and therefore as a programmer & educator.

David’s program notes include the following:

…the materials which have come down to us from the 17th and 18th centuries are full of mysteries. The main surviving musical score dates from the mid-18th century, over fifty years after the death of Henry Purcell. There is a libretto (text only) from 1689, entitled “An Opera perform’d at Mr Josias Priest’s Boarding-School at Chelsey, by young gentlewomen”…. Unfortunately there are many details in the libretto which are not reflected in the surviving score. For instance, the libretto of Dido has a prologue for which there is no music in the score. As well, there are numerous indications for dances in the libretto, but again, much music is missing. In our production, we have tried to fill in some of these gaps.

Artistic Director Marshall Pynkoski says a few things that might seem to be a contradiction.

For our current performances we have stripped the production down considerably, focusing more than ever on clear, coherent storytelling and the opera’s inherent tension between the rigid formality of a courtly world at odds with the most visceral of human emotions.

It’s not stripped down as far as I could see, but is a longer Dido than any that one could find in the world, due to the additions to which David alludes. Pynkoski continues

I would be remiss if I did not thank my entire artistic team, most of whom have explored this opera with me for more than thirty years.

While he thanks the new additions – the Toronto Children’s Chorus—and again thanks Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra, I see no mention of the creator of this work. Is it a team effort, written / assembled by Pynkoski and Fallis plus others? I wish I knew, as this is in some ways a bold experiment. I’d like to know whose name appears on the copyright, if indeed anyone is bothering to create one, for this new version of the opera.  Perhaps at some point they might realize that other opera companies might want to produce this or something like it.  At the very least it deserves more recognition in the program than Pynkoski offered.

Let me repeat, this is not a stripped down Dido. There’s a brand-new prologue that gives us some of the subtext.  Perhaps Pynkoski seeks to defend the longer opera.  I wonder if there was a long conversation/debate before this version was arrived at, because if it had been up to me, it would be longer still. The prologue includes a long dramatic reading from Vergil’s Aeneid, spoken in a big declamatory voice by Irene Poole, who has the role of “Narrator”. Perhaps that’s exactly as it appears in the libretto, yet I would doubt this is how Purcell imagined it, but that it’s more a pragmatic choice, a matter of how it had to be done with the available resources. If this segment could have been somehow set to music, in some sort of arioso arranged from something else Purcell composed it would have been much longer & more expensive. This version is spoken with some music underneath, as you’d get in a melodrama, and doesn’t seem apt for the 17th century, but of course i could be wrong.  And so while part of me rejoices with the bold new creation, another part of me is quibbling, that for a company whose lifeblood has been historicity, that the dramaturgy in this segment is a bit puzzling, at least in the use of the narrator. Yet perhaps this was a choice in service of authenticity, for fear of being too strange, too adventurous, too hard to justify. It’s ironic given that at times the earlier baroque (before 1700) could dispense with restrictions, given the readiness of performers to substitute arias by other composers, and the readiness by some to borrow music from others. Fallis’ use of a passage by another composer (Marais) is totally defensible within this tradition.

David is totally right when he speaks of how the additional material “restores the greater length of an opera that is often considered a small chamber work”. In other words, the weight this adds makes total sense, both in the prologue and in the dances, and makes a full meal out of what has been a mere appetizer.

giunta

Wallis Giunta and Brett Vansickle (photo: Bruce Zinger)

The posters showing beautiful pictures of Wallis Giunta accurately reflect her star power. In a recent class, we talked about the “triple threat”, and how opera singers rarely have that kind of versatility (I could only think of Barbara Hannigan for her unprecedented work in Lulu), yet tonight we watched both Giunta and Christopher Enns moving with the dancers, if not fully incorporated into Jeannette Lajeunesse Zingg’s choreography. Vying with these two for our affections was Opera Atelier & Toronto Consort stalwart Laura Pudwell as a very funny Sorceress with that big voice. Meghan Lindsay was a strong Belinda, a sympathetic presence alongside Dido.

With such a beautiful opera, how could making it longer be anything but an improvement? I suggest you see it for yourself to confirm that additional material improves it. Dido and Aeneas runs until October 29th at the Elgin Theatre.

Posted in Reviews | 1 Comment

What to expect from Ariodante

Part of me is dying to spill the beans about the Canadian Opera Company’s co-production of Ariodante that opened this afternoon in a matinee at Four Seasons Centre, but I have to tread carefully, as I studiously avoid spoilers, especially when the advance knowledge might subtract from your experience. The headline is a half-truth because I only tell you some of what to expect.

I’ll be a bit more open after I’ve seen it a second time. Let me just say that I am eager for a second look at this dense and layered mixture. Expect something complex.  It had people talking to strangers in the bathroom.

I think I’ve missed opera, given that I dished out a load of superlatives last night yet feel that what I just saw might have been better. Could it really be that good? or am I now just over-dosing after suffering opera withdrawal, a happy Pollyanna ready to gush about anything.

But maybe I’ll put it in perspective by speaking briefly about Norma again. The singing last night was amazing, yes, and without any messy directorial overlay to prevent us from getting at Bellini. But I think I was craving complex flavours, and the COC delivered.  This
Ariodante is the product of the team of Richard Jones and ULTZ. This is the same Richard Jones whose 1993 Royal Opera House Ring Cycle influenced other cycles, including that of Robert Lepage; those crumbling gods at the end of Brunnhilde’s Immolation Scene are done much better in what the ROH offered in 1993 (alas no longer available on youtube). ULTZ is the designer working with Jones, but I don’t pretend to know whose ideas we’re really seeing, other than to say that the outcome is very stimulating.

I would identify this as director’s theatre but with the caveat that it’s of that rare sort that illuminates without obscuring the original, and adding something in the process. With Handel I am never going to be a textual fundamentalist, because there’s no real tradition to point to, unless we seek to reproduce the productions as Handel made them in his failed attempts in London (a failure that leads him to oratorio, especially Messiah). Ariodante for example is full of ballet music, but that doesn’t mean a director necessarily uses those passages for dance. Sometimes Jones gives us dance, sometimes drama employing puppets designed and directed by Finn Caldwell. We get to have it both ways, as the story arc is presented to us, even if the characters onstage don’t precisely behave as the score prescribes. So in other words there likely shouldn’t be the sort of controversy we had over Tcherniakov’s Don Giovanni or Claus Guth’s Marriage of Figaro, both of which upset some people for the departures and alterations to beloved works. Ariodante doesn’t have nearly so many alterations, and more importantly, as a non-canonical work, nobody’s going to be terribly upset at departures from a story that most people don’t even know.

There are nonetheless additional layers that aren’t in the text. The action has been moved to a small Scottish island, the story set in a recent past even if the actions of the story –particularly justice done by fighting duels—are more fitting for previous centuries rather than recently. Such infelicities can be ignored when the director’s overlay illuminates: as this one does. It’s normal for Polinesso to conspire to undermine his political rival Ariodante (sabotaging his marriage to the princess Ginevra, not just by slandering her, but by arranging to have Ariodante see Dalinda, a co-conspirator dressed exactly as Ginevra seeming to have a liaison with Polinesso). In Jones’ reading Polinesso is a preacher whose rants get the tiny community of this production riled up at the sinful actions that Ginevra is alleged to have committed.

16-17-02-MC-D-0093

(l-r) Varduhi Abrahamyan in preacher garb as Polinesso (in background), Jane Archibald as Ginevra and Ambur Braid as Dalinda in the Canadian Opera Company’s production of Ariodante, 2016. (photo: Michael Cooper)

His co-conspirator Dalinda is not merely infatuated with Polinesso, but wears the visible bruises, as we discover a second rougher look corresponding to the person underneath.

16-17-02-MC-D-0926

Varduhi Abrahamyan as Polinesso and Ambur Braid as Dalinda (in background) in the Canadian Opera Company’s production of Ariodante, 2016. (photo: Michael Cooper)

The action of the story invites comparisons between pairs:

  • Ginevra and her double Dalinda: both of whom sing coloratura soprano, although one is a princess, one is of a lower class
  • Ariodante and his political rival Polinesso: both of whom are male characters sung by mezzo-sopranos in male attire
  • Lurcanio and Polinesso, who offer two contrasting ways to pursue Dalinda (Lurcanio rejected initially, Polinesso rejecting Dalinda but pursued by her nonetheless); but Lurcanio recovers from rejection to become the most powerful agent in the story, defying Polinesso and defeating him in combat

Jane Archibald as Ginevra is the focus of the production, a starring role that makes great use of her vocal abilities. Hers is a different sound from that of Ambur Braid, who steals the show as Dalinda.  Varduhl Abrahamyan as Polinesso was genuinely scary, and one of the most believably male trouser performances I’ve ever seen, especially when beating up on Braid.  Yet it was Braid and not Archibald or Abrahamyan who was the most interesting character onstage, a flawed individual right on the boundary between pathos and humour, many of her lines drawing nervous giggles from the audience. Alice Coote in the title role had a swaggering realism as a man, believably opting out of the first act bridal dance like so many men I’ve seen fleeing the dance-floor. Her singing is not overpowering, her coloratura not especially precise, but she offers something more important by inhabiting genuine feelings during her arias, authentic and in the moment. Owen McCausland was a suitably macho Lurcanio. While there were several poignant lament arias–one each for Braid, Coote and Archibald—the most moving number for me dramatically, one that elicited dead silence in the hall was the reconciliation duet between Braid & McCausland, a matter of question marks and possibilities rather than a genuine pathway. Johannes Weisser as King and Ginevra’s father gets to be the figure of dominance at the head of this quirky island of fundamentalists.

The production is full of self-reflexive and meta-theatrical moments, particularly in the use of puppetry in several key moments that are scored as ballet, but of course, can be staged any way the director wants. This is especially powerful at the climax of Acts II (Ginevra’s nightmares resembling hallucinations) and III (the resolution of the story).

16-17-02-MC-D-0711

A scene from the Canadian Opera Company’s production of Ariodante, 2016 featuring Finn Caldwell’s puppet design/direction (photo: Michael Cooper)

The chorus have their moments as do the orchestra, brisk and crisp throughout under the direction of Johannes Debus, although it might have been a bit too brisk, considering that there were a couple of moments when soloists seemed hard-pressed to keep up. But even so the complexities of the stage picture matched the lovely sonorities presented to our ears.

Ariodante continues until November 4th at the Four Seasons Centre. For further information click here.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | 3 Comments

Radvanovsky’s Norma

This isn’t your usual Norma. It’s an opera that requires talent and skill far above and beyond what’s usual or normal.  Believe the hype about Sondra Radvanovsky, who is singing the lead in Bellini’s bel canto masterpiece, in a cast as strong as any I’ve ever seen for a Canadian Opera Company production.  I saw it tonight and am happy to be seeing it again.

norma-cw-1

Sondra Radvanovsky as Norma in the Canadian Opera Company/San Francisco Opera (SFO)/Gran Teatre del Liceu/Lyric Opera of Chicago co-production of Norma, 2014, SFO. (Photo: Cory Weaver)

I’m very lucky that I’ve seen Radvanovsky enough times that I now begin to know some of her mannerisms, to recognize certain quirks of her performance.  In her longest roles she knows how to save her energy, brilliantly marshaling her resources for key phrases, climactic scenes.  And then when the going gets tough she gets a look in her eyes that’s totally ferocious, such that if you were the high notes printed in the score you’d be scared of what she’s about to do to you.  She seems to click into a higher gear, get more alert, more energized, her eyes widening and the scene and the music effortlessly being devoured as though she were a shark and the whole theatre full of people were her dinner.  She effortlessly inhales us, her voice swallowing two thousand of us in one gulp.  Yes she is a humble presence, especially during curtain calls, but in those moments when she clicks into that take no prisoners mode of singing she could be a thousand feet tall, her voice undaunted by any big orchestration or chorus competing with her for our attention.  Oh sure, there are other people onstage with her and they were good.  But at those key moments she totally makes everyone, everything vanish.

I guess you can tell that I like what she did.

There are times I think of opera as escapism, especially lately.  I’ve been watching way too much CNN  although tonight I will turn on Saturday Night Live, which begins in a few minutes.  I couldn’t help noticing that maybe the story of Norma isn’t so old.  A man who has kids with one woman falls in love with another younger woman, and would run off with her.  Act I could be the story of either of the US Presidential nominees, although when we get to the second act it turns out that the Druids and Romans are better behaved than our contemporary liars and cheaters.  And why didn’t I realize before, that if a serial monogamist has kids from a previous wife that he left, the excellence of the kids is probably more a testimonial to the mom than the dad?  Yes I was fitting the moderns to the operatic template like paper dolls, trying on outfits, Norma sometimes reminding me of Ivana confronting Melania, sometimes reminding me more of HRC as she tells a colossal lie with a straight face to a crowd of people.  And perhaps people used to leap into pyres at the ends of stories to spare us the endless hours of dissection on CNN, a merciful option that unfortunately is missing from the 21st century version.  But pardon me, I digress.

Kevin Newsbury’s production is recognizably the usual story, unencumbered by a directorial overlay.  We’re in a world reminiscent of “Game  of Thrones” which is to say that they don’t get in the way of the story.   Stephen Lord brings his high octane conducting to the orchestra pit, holding nothing back.

Yes there were other singers besides Sondra Radvanovsky, and they were quite good.  Russell Thomas was a better fit tonight as Pollione than in Carmen last year (when he was quite good), the voice effortlessly soaring to a ton of high notes, and an especially good casting choice considering the powerful sound emanating from the pit thanks to Lord.   It was great to hear Isabel Leonard again, a beautiful technique up to all the challenges Bellini threw her way, and a tone that blended perfectly with Radvanovsky.  Dimitriy Ivashchenko too was a welcome return, the same big bold sound he made as Hunding a couple of years ago but entirely Italianate this time.

Among such a talented group, the two young Canadians in smaller parts weren’t at all out of place, Charles Sy as Flavio and Aviva Fortunata as Clotilde.  And the COC Chorus sounded great too.

The time flies by on the wings of the bel canto.  I’m looking forward to seeing this again.  Norma will be presented at the Four Seasons Centre by the Canadian Opera Company until November 5th.  Don’t miss it.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | 5 Comments