Adrianne’s Ariadne

Adrianne Pieczonka

Soprano Adrianne Pieczonka

You know you’re an opera fan when___ .  There are lots of ways to complete the sentence, but how about this one(….?): you know you’re an opera fan when you come out of the Lion King, humming Ariadne auf Naxos.  True I saw Lion King Tuesday night.  I saw Ariadne April 30th .  Richard Strauss stayed with me better than Elton John.

Of course I was also buzzing because I knew I’d be seeing it again: tonight in fact.  The cast was slightly different, as I got a look at Adrianne Pieczonka as Ariadne.

I have to wonder.  Has she been resting? Or on a  different regimen?  Not only did I find that her face looks a bit different, but she sounds different.  I’ve never seen an Ariadne smile so much;  the first half of the role especially, often gets a gloomy interpretation, but not Pieczonka.

 I last saw her as Leonora in Fidelio back in 2009, opposite Richard Margison, with whom she again takes the stage.  The voice sounds stronger and more self-assured.  Granted, Ariadne is not a long role, but even so, I was amazed at how easy the whole thing seemed.  At times she seemed to be holding back, with lots of voice in reserve.  I wonder whether she’s now ready to undertake more demanding roles?  The Siegfried Brünnhilde for example (the smallest of the three Brünnhildes) seems easily within her reach.  The voice had a kind of pop to it that I haven’t heard before.

Deeper into the run, Neil Armfield’s production ran better than it had on opening night, starting with Pieczonka, who managed a couple of comic moments with the commedia folk upstaging her, yet brought a noble stance to her Ariadne.  Her smile–which i mentioned– really added a dimension, so that even in the passages where she wasn’t singing, she was always interesting to watch.

The commedia figures(John Easterlin, Peter Barrett, Michael Uloth and Christopher Enns) didn’t try quite so hard this time, which made them funnier.  When there was a lazzo, we got lotso silliness, but I felt there was less of the scrambly energy that I saw on the opening night when I felt they inadvertently upstaged one another.  While they’re all better, Barrett in particular has improved as Arlecchino, simply by relaxing.

Jane Archibald as Zerbinetta, surrounded by her adoring admirers

Jane Archibald as Zerbinetta, surrounded by her adoring admirers

The commedia quartet are a  great backdrop for Jane Archibald’s Zerbinetta, owning the stage whenever she wanted it.

The trio of nymphs (Simone Osborne, Lauren Segal and Teiya Kasahara) sounded more musical, absolutely perfect in their pitch tonight, and blending wonderfully with one another.  I am a complete sucker for Echo’s lines.  Echo repeats what others have said as if she were a little bit demented: because she IS Echo.  Kasahara brought a touching naivete to her delivery, adding a wonderful pathos throughout.

And it was a special pleasure to once again watch and hear Andrew Davis lead the orchestra.  His pacing is brave to say the least, with a breath-taking tempo in the nymphs’ set-piece introducing Bacchus, and always brisk & energetic.

It’s a bit shocking to look at the calendar, and recognize that May isn’t half over yet.  The COC still have until May 29th:

  • Four Cinderellas (May 13, 19, 22 & 25)
  • Six Orfeos (May 14, 17, 20, 24, 26, 28)
    and
  • Five Ariadnes (May 15, 18, 21, 27 & 29)

I am seeing Orfeo again.  I wonder if I can resist the other two operas.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lion Taymor

Director Julie Taymor

Director Julie Taymor

I knew I was going to use a punny headline of some sort, this was perhaps the least offensive among my options.  I saw The Lion King tonight, admittedly years after its opening, and awhile after its first appearance in Toronto (this is the King’s second coming).  Everyone’s already seen it so what’s the point of a review?

I noticed a couple of things tonight, and they’re the subject I’ll talk about.

A lot of ink has been spilled concerning Julie Taymor’s Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark, a hugely expensive musical that drew negative reviews.  I couldn’t help but notice that Taymor seemed to take a lot of flak, something I wondered about.

Has Taymor earned the right to flop? The Lion King is one of several successes.  At the Metropolitan Opera, her production of The Magic Flute does for opera during the Christmas season what The Nutcracker does for ballet companies: cha-ching!  And there are films as well, some (Frida) more successful than others (The Tempest).  I’m particularly fond of Across the Universe, by the way.

I have been thinking about a connection I keep making in my head between Taymor and Robert Lepage.  It crystallized today, when I noticed some interesting parallels.

Man + machine = animal

Man + machine = animal

Both of them seem to like puppets and odd constructions attached to the human body.  Taymor? Tonight I was struck in Lion King by all those fabulous contraptions attached to the characters.  I believe the Spiderman musical was a more daring version going in the same general direction, which is to say, promoting spectacle and theatricality.  Frida, by the way, also explores similar themes of a very different sort; whereas the animals in Lion King are almost cyborgs in their marriage of man & machine, in Frida it’s the human-machine interface in the presence of catastrophic injury and disability. How weird, I think, that we seem to have this parallel thing happening.

From Damnation de Faust

From Damnation de Faust (follow link for more images)

Lepage also is playing with things attached to humans.  In Damnation de Faust we see soldiers climbing walls attached to wires, then –as if slain—hanging on those wires.  Demons dance with sylphs on similar wires, while multiple Jesuses climb the walls in a re-enactment of a crucifixion (not my favourite part of his staging by the way).  In Das Rheingold we watched gods dancing on the end of wires, particularly Loge the trickster god, walking backwards up a wall.  The Rhine Maidens were virtually puppets who could sing, floating high above the stage.

There’s a similarity, too, in some of the critical noises I am hearing.  We heard about the injuries to cast-members in the Spiderman musical, due to the risky aerial manoeuvres.  Something similar—on a smaller scale—happened with Lepage and Die Walküre.  There have been reports of singers slipping on the set.

And I think that’s where I see the parallel.  Both Lepage & Taymor are directors with a heavy investment in elaborate mise-en-scène (both in terms of time and money).  Among the headlines I considered before discarding were “actor envy” and “those who can’t act direct”.   I was trying to identify the conflict I sense between the performers and these two directors.  Both Taymor & Lepage seem to be the stars of their respective work, so much so that it’s almost inconceivable to conceive of a star appearing in one of their shows (and I set Lepage’s Ring cycle aside because of course the Metropolitan will cast their shows with stars regardless of who directs).

Robert Lepage (Canadian Press photo)

Robert Lepage (Canadian Press photo)

I wonder if that explains the flak coming at Taymor & Lepage.  Yes, actors were injured in the Spiderman musical, and someone might have been hurt in Walkuere.   I wonder, though if maybe there’s something else at work, considering especially how gleeful some of the reports became concerning Taymor’s failure.

These two directors seem to supplant the actors / singers one expects to see starring in their works.  I can see how that might put a few noses out of joint.

I am seeing Lepage’s Walküre Saturday afternoon in a Scarborough movie theatre, one of many thousands who’ll also see it live from a theatre somewhere in the world.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Essays, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

COC Orfeo ed Euridice

Isabel Bayrakdarian as Euridice

Isabel Bayrakdarian as Euridice: ashes to ashes. Photo Credit: © 2006 Dan Rest/Lyric Opera of Chicago

Some subjects are so immense that the only way to put them onstage is by making them into opera.  Gluck‘s Orfeo ed Euridice takes on all the major topics—love, death and art –in a concise 90 minute plot.  They don’t get any bigger than this.

Calzabigi’s libretto opens with Orfeo mourning Euridice’s recent death.  Amore (Love) appears to him to suggest that he bring his wife back from the underworld: so long as he does not look back while he leads her forth nor explain the reason for his refusal to look.  Inevitably Euridice is heart-broken by Orfeo’s refusal, leading him to glance fatally upon her.  But Amore accepts this as proof of his/her power, and brings Euridice back a second time, for a celebration of Love Triumphant.

For this tale Director Robert Carsen and Designer Tobias Hoheisel present a world whose very essence reminds us of myth.  We see individuals carrying pots of fire in a colourless landscape of ashes.  In this grey world only Orfeo cries out in passion, an artist and a lover.  The power of beauty is central to the tale, both in Orfeo’s compelling song that calms the savage underworld, and in his inability to resist Euridice’s heart-break.

My favourite moments were Orfeo’s Act II encounter with the Furies and the Blessed Spirits.  Carsen’s underworld is breath-takingly simple, largely due to Hoheisel’s stark design.  Once again the COC chorus are standouts, not just musically, but also as an ensemble of compelling actors.  Credit also belongs to Conductor Harry Bicket and the COC Orchestra, who were all to be commended for their–wait for it–  heavenly sweetness.   I am looking forward to seeing this again.

Ambur Braid

Ambur Braid, who portrays Amore (Love)

I am still trying to decode an interesting approach to Amore from Carsen/Hoheisel.  Love is both God and Goddess, changeable and all-powerful in this world.  Ambur Braid’s portrayal of Love first appears in an apparently male aspect in the first act, reappearing in a female guise in the last act.  I am not sure I understand the rationale; perhaps Love has no gender, or is a shape-shifter able to do anything? I am admittedly fascinated by the question of gender as it has presented itself to me in several operas over the past few weeks.

When we encounter an opera without benefit of visuals—as we might with an audio recording, or if we were blind—some of the voices are ambiguous in their gender coding.  We usually assume low voices, particularly basses and baritones, are male, while high voices are female.  But some characters are much harder to decode without visuals.

  • The Composer in Ariadne auf Naxos and Annio in La Clemenza di Tito are males that are played by women, singing mezzo-soprano: in so-called “trouser roles”.  Visuals do not fully repair the confusion caused by the counter-intuitive sound of a  high voice portraying a male unless the portrayal is as excellent as those seen recently in Toronto (Mireille Lebel making it especially easy with her six-foot swaggering Annio, Alice Coote also persuasive as the Composer).  Needless to say there is great pleasure to be had in that space of ambiguity, whereby we may explore aspects of gender identity.
  • Tito’s friend Sesto, like Orfeo, is a male character who was originally written to be sung by a castrato (an extinct vocal species).  My first encounter with Orfeo was for a baritone with the music transposed.  My first video encounter with this opera starred Janet Baker as Orfeo, although I have since happily met counter-tenor Orfeos.

I have to wonder whether an 18th century audience would be as confused as their modern counterpart at some of the approaches that are used.  And so, I believe the origins of the gender flexibility Carsen/Hoheisel bring to the character of Love arise from the stylistic conventions of the 18th century and the indeterminacy arising from different approaches to the score.

Counter-tenor Lawrence Zazzo

Counter-tenor Lawrence Zazzo, starring as Orfeo

The COC production stars counter-tenor Lawrence Zazzo as Orfeo.  It’s a phenomenal challenge, given that there are few moments in the opera when he isn’t at the centre of the action.  Zazzo offers himself up with complete conviction, singing with wonderful accuracy, his passion carefully balanced with reason.  Isabel Bayrakdarian, who begins to sing comparatively late in the opera, is a beautiful Euridice, convincingly barraging Orfeo with her emotion to the point where he does the unthinkable, thereby causing her death.

With Orfeo sharing the stage with Ariadne and Cenerentola, the current season feels very much like a new plateau for the COC.  I thought of Alexander Neef & Richard Bradshaw.  At this point we can genuinely say that what we’re seeing reflects Neef, almost four years after Bradshaw’s passing in the summer of 2007.  Neef was hired in June 2008, assuming his post in the fall of that year.  That season (2008-2009) as well as the next (2009-2010) still bear the stamp of those who came before.  Only now in the present season (2010-2011) can we say that Neef has really started to show us his true colours.

And what colours.  With Aida and Death in Venice in the fall, The Magic Flute and Nixon in China in the winter, a brief interlude in Brooklyn to export Lepage’s take on Stravinsky’s Nightingale, the season closes with the current group.   This month has been an exquisite month for opera in Toronto.

We shouldn’t be surprised that Neef surpasses Bradshaw, who was both the COC artistic director & chief conductor.  With Johannes Debus to supervise his orchestra & matters musical, Neef is able to concentrate on programming & running the company.

But before we close the book on this season, I’m looking forward to seeing more performances during the month of May.  Orfeo shares the stage with excellent productions of La Cenerentola and Ariadne auf Naxos, the most amazing month I’ve ever experienced from the COC.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Two tunes

William Shookoff’s Opera By Request presented two short operas last night, I Pagliacci paired with Gianni Schicchi.   It’s an interesting pairing.  Once upon a time you’d encounter two verismo shockers (Cavalleria Rusticana and Pagliacci), each ending with death and a loud climax.

Shookoff’s pairing, one that is becoming more common, brings us contrasting works.  One is a dark tragedy, the other a witty comedy.  One is the sole success of a composer –Ruggero Leoncavallo—who was never to attain a similar success thereafter; the other brings us the effortless melody we’ve come to expect from Puccini.

These operas contain two of the two most famous tunes in opera.  “Vesti la giubba” was Caruso’s greatest success, the first record in history to sell over a million copies.  I might be stretching things, to put “Oh mio babbino caro” in the same category (maybe “Un bel di” is better known?), but it is certainly a familiar tune, from its appearance in such films as Room with a View and Prizzi’s Honor.

There were several great moments in Pagliacci.  Larry Tozer started the evening with a warm reading of the Prologue.  Stephen MacDonald was a tuneful Beppe, particularly in his serenade during the play within the opera (as Arlecchino).  Not surprisingly the highlight of the opera came during Canio’s big aria, in a vividly angry reading from Jay Lambie.

William Shookhoff

William Shookhoff

In contrast, Gianni Schicchi was more of an ensemble experience, one that seemed to bring out the best in Shookhoff—who played with more intensity than in the first opera—and his soloists.  Comic honours must go to Monica Zerbe (Zita) & Henry Irwin (Simone).  On the lyrical side, Macdonald was a wonderful Rinuccio, opposite the Lauretta of Ada Balon, whose aria was genuinely radiant.  Andrew Tam –reportedly under the weather—was especially commanding as Schicchi.

Opera By Request will be back in a few days, offering a special treat.  Friday the 13th we’ll hear their Das Rheingold, the night before the Metropolitan Opera HighDef broadcast of Die Walküre Saturday afternoon.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Orange signage

Edward Levesque's Kitchen

Not a political endorsement

When the opera’s on at 4:30, it makes for some intriguing possibilities, such as dinner after the show.

When the dinner is chez Edward Levesque’s Kitchen the meal may be as operatic as what came before.  While the food may not sing, my tastebuds certainly did.

We interrupt this review to observe, in passing, that Edward Levesque’s sign is the same colour, more or less, as the political party currently getting all the attention right now.  Is THAT why I stopped the car, to go inside ? no of course not. I turned north from Eastern Avenue, hoping I could get in without a reservation: and got lucky.  The colour’s just one more thing they got right.

I didn’t eat excessively, just as much as I needed.  I peered into the abyss of over-indulgence and came away happily sated.  Is that the restaurant’s doing or my own will-power?  i don’t know, but i believe the restaurant deserves credit, considering that i was highly stimulated yet able to eat in healthy moderation.  I feel that this is a place that  not only stirs the pleasure centres but keeps the intellect engaged.  We did not have to imitate Thelma or Louise in our ecstasy; oh no, our brakes work and we stopped at the brink, even if we did have a good look at the view.

As the menu bemused us, we had little brioches with hummus and chives, which served to appetize us mightily.  As the menu continued to play with our brains, we knew we’d enjoy starting with our respective beverages and grilled calimari accompanied by crispy cabbage, coconut/lime sauce, cashews and organic pea shoots; I was pondering the charms of the Montevina Barbera, a complex California red.

On the conservative side of the table: an unassuming dish, called “chicken pot pie”.  What the name doesn’t include is that tarragon haze hanging over the table, the rosemary crust, the quality of the chicken.  Levesque’s meats and produce are not to be confused with what one finds elsewhere.  Everything you find here is very healthy and very sustainable.  Or, as the menu puts it: “Menu changed often, all food as local as can be, and all summer long – from the farm/no trans fats.”

On my side of the table, something a bit more offbeat.  They brought roasted green asparagus, nicely plumbing the depths of the barbera with the accompanying gorgonzola, truffle oil, garlic crumbs and  lemon.  And alongside, the “big green salad,” not precisely what your average linebacker might order yet big enough for one.  The subtleties of the greens, roasted sweet peppers, toasted walnuts, cider/basil vinaigrette and those little clumps of chevre were a nice counterpoint to the brash green spears to their left.

We resisted the desserts even though we were tempted. I felt positively virtuous, my mouth aglow with the chef’s theatrics, finishing with a coffee.

I think i need to go to this restaurant more often.  So far every time has been special.

Edward Levesque’s Kitchen, 1290 Queen St E., just east of Leslie St.

Posted in Food, Health and Nutrition, Reviews | Leave a comment

Ariadne in Toronto

Sir Andrew Davis

Sir Andrew Davis, who made his first appearance conducting with the COC

The premiere of the new Canadian Opera Company production of Ariadne auf Naxos was  a dramatic occasion indeed.  Neil Armfield’s new production, handsomely designed by Dale Ferguson, was upstaged by some genuine drama.

First, there was the return of Sir Andrew Davis, former Music Director of the Toronto Symphony, who made his long-delayed debut conducting with the COC.  Davis gave us brave tempi indeed, taking a brisk and business-like approach throughout that i believe served Strauss very well.  The COC Orchestra seemed happy enough, sounding lustrous.

Then, we heard that local soprano Adrianne Pieczonka, scheduled to sing the title role, was forced to cancel due to illness.  As a result we experienced the debut of an understudy in the title role.

Soprano Amber Wagner

Soprano Amber Wagner, who made her COC debut in a surprise appearance as Ariadne in place of Adrianne Pieczonka

Young American soprano Amber Wagner made her COC debut singing the Ariadne.  There were no telltale signs that Wagner was unprepared for the part that i could see.  At one point –during a scene with Zerbinetta where a scarf gets trapped under a body– I was thinking “ah this is because she’s the understudy,  an unfortunate mistake”.  But that was a purposeful and clever part of the direction, not a mistake, as we soon discovered.

Wagner wasted no time in showing us she was for real.  In the Prologue she was a deliciously bitchy Prima Donna backstage before she came onstage in the “opera” as Ariadne.  The voice is rich, reminding me of Jessye Norman or Helen Traubel, but without the tendency those two great stars had to sometimes sing below pitch.   At the very least, Wagner showed us that she belongs comfortably at this level, and never resembled a replacement.

Richard Margison

Tenor Richard Margison

Another Canadian raised eyebrows as well. Richard Margison has spent his career singing the starring roles in French & Italian opera, known for his rendition of “Nessun dorma.”  I saw something new a couple of years ago, when Margison took on Florestan in Fidelio, a part usually entrusted to a heldentenor.  Bacchus in Ariadne is another role requiring a genuinely heroic sound.  Like Florestan, it’s not a long role, and therefore is a good choice for a singer exploring a new type of role.   I would say on the basis of what i heard that Margison has made a clever move, as there is a world-wide demand for this kind of singer, a demand that as far as i can tell, Margison can and will fulfill easily.  The voice sounded huge no matter how loudly the orchestra played, and the top is still as effortless as ever.

I keep talking about star performances.  I am not about to stop anytime soon.

Jane Archibald as Zerbinetta

Jane Archibald pleasing the crowd as Zerbinetta

The audience favourite was hard to discern, given Davis’ popular return, Margison’s heroics, and especially the drama surrounding Amber Wagner’s substitution and fearless performance.  With all those candidates, i think the loudest applause likely went to our Zerbinetta –admittedly the role that normally steals our hearts– portrayed by Jane Archibald.  The singing wasn’t just accurate, but infused with all the flirtatiousness that we could wish for in a Zerbinetta.  Director Armfield gave the character a gradual crescendo of adoration, climaxing in her aria, a swaggering showpiece to bring Strauss back from the dead.  The adoring males included not just the entire onstage Commedia dell’Arte troupe but even conductor Davis, to whom Archibald playfully blew kisses, and thereby expanding the show outside the proscenium in the process.

The other star in the production was Alice Coote as the Composer.  Armfield pushed this Composer in a more serious direction than I have seen, by making the Prologue a very modern backstage environment, complete with cigarettes and pizza.  At first i thought this might backfire, especially watching Coote, in her earnestness facing the irreverent cacophony of the callous theatre professionals.

But Armfield showed me something i either never saw before or perhaps was too cynical to notice.  As he points out in the director’s notes, with reference to Zerbinetta, “underneath the smiles of the clown there is a human heart breaking.”  While it’s true that Zerbinetta says words to that effect, every Zerbinetta I’ve ever seen plays from the outside in, making us admire her skills while keeping us at a distance.  We don’t see the soft heart beating under the surface: except in this production.   And as a result the opera, when it began, seemed especially artificial, after the realism we’d seen in the Prologue.

The strength of the COC’s company was clearly in evidence on several fronts, whether in the clear voices of Naiad, Dryad and Echo (Simone Osborne, Lauren Segal and Teiya Kasahara), or in the plethora of delightful performances, such as Peter Barrett’s Arlecchino, Christopher Enns’ Scaramuccio, and Adrian Kramer, making more comedic capital out of the tiny role of the Wig-Maker than usual.

Ariadne auf Naxos (likely with Adrianne Pieczonka re-assuming the title role) continues until May 29th at the Four Seasons Centre.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | 6 Comments

La Cenerentola

Elizabeth DeShong(Angelina) and her rodent friends in the Canadian Opera Company production of Cinderella (La Cenerentola). Photo Credit: © 2011 Michael Cooper

The current Canadian Opera Company production of La Cenerentola brings me face to face with one of the great themes, and sorry if I am about to sound like your junior high English teacher.  While the opera probably can be explored in several ways, this production concentrates on the great question of how we reconcile illusion and reality.

This co-production of Houston Grand Opera Association, Welsh National Opera, Gran Teatre del Liceu and Grand Théâtre de Genève, employing Els Comediants from Spain in the production team (Joan Font as director, Joan Guillén as set & costume designer) now has come to Toronto.

I will quickly say it’s a huge success musically, and then set that aside while I talk about the production, one of the most remarkable I have ever seen.

While Rossini’s take on Cinderella differs in a few key ways from the fairy tale as  Canadian children know it, the chief plotline is the same:

  • Girl is mis-treated by step-sisters and step-parent (this time it’s a step-father rather than a step-mother)
  • Prince seeks bride
  • While the step-sisters present themselves to t he Prince, it is the unknown beauty –Cinderalla after a makeover—who turns the Prince’s head
  • But Cinderella leaves, forcing the Prince to come find her
  • …and once he finds her, love conquers all

Els Comediants bring a unique flavour to this production.  They’re known for a carnivalesque approach that they employed in the time of Franco as a kind of protest.  It shouldn’t therefore be surprising that they manage to preserve the fun of this fairytale, while infusing it with an activist sensibility, taking Cinderella to unexpected depths.

At first glance the eye is almost overwhelmed by the colourful excess of the design.  While Angelina (Cinderella) is in the appropriate muted browns, while cleaning the floor, her two step-sisters’ outfits are clownishly flamboyant.

As we meet the family, we notice something else: a series of rodents –mice or rats?—who are silent observers of the action throughout.  Their outfits are highly artificial, reminding me of

  1. The Nutcracker
  2. Characters in Art Spiegelman’s illustrated novel Maus
  3. a 2010 production of Wagner’s Lohengrin directed by Hans Neuenfels.  If originality counts for anything, it needs to be said that the Comediants’ rodents predate Neuenfels by at least three year (and thank you Opera Chic for the images from Bayreuth).

2010 Bayreuth Festival production of Wagner’s Lohengrin

Unpacking the metaphor could push me to thousands of words.  But imagine that this light tale suddenly acquires unexpected weight.  Cinderella shares her oppression with silent witnesses.  As I set aside my concern and confusion during the first part of the opera I was untroubled, because I was busy laughing at Donato DiStefano’s astonishing portrayal of Don Magnifico, alternatively funny, disgusting, terrifying, and always framed within a traditional buffo approach to the singing and acting.

Partway through the first act I overcame my confusion, when everything clicked into focus as something very deliberate and self-consistent.  Don Magnifico & his daughters (Cinderella’s step-sisters) have a very different value system than Cinderella, mistaking the trappings and the wealth for real value, claiming to be better than a mere servant.  In a world of playful and flamboyant dress-up, transformation and magic are possible.  Ramiro (the Prince) and his servant exchange roles, fooling Don Magnifico’s family, but not Cinderella, who knows who she is and what she wants.  The rodents are more real than any other part of the opera, taking on the role of puppeteers in the enacted shadow-puppetry illustration of Ramiro’s carriage accident: the providential turning point of the plot whereby Cinderella and the Prince are brought together.  It’s spooky how powerful some of this can be, when you’re laughing so hard, yet seeing something so dream-like.  At no time were we led away from the text, as the production respects Rossini, even as it shows us unexpected depths.

Donato DiStefano as Don Magnifico

Donato DiStefano as Don Magnifico, photographed by Michal Daniel

Although all the principals had wonderful moments DiStefano was the most interesting portrayal to watch, whether sleepy, pompous, threatening, drunk, afraid or sneering with disbelief at his step-daughter’s surprising elevation.

I could go on about DiStefano’s vocal delivery, a catalogue of the possible comical sounds a buffo singer can make.  Yes he’s funny. He’s also completely in character while singing, so persuasive that you get lost in the opera.

While prettier of voice than DiStefano, Brett Polegato’s Dandini gave DiStefano a run for the money. Polegato had a voice that’s  apt for bel canto while being one of the comic stars of the performance.

Elizabeth DeShong as Cinderella was thoroughly musical, not just coloratura & high notes, but a beautiful tone in her lower register as well.  Kyle Ketelsen brought a majestic sound to the role of Alidoro, the philosopher who—at least in this production—helps Cinderella through a magical transformation.

I said the singing was good?  But that doesn’t really do it justice.  Lawrence Brownlee as Ramiro (the Prince) has an amazingvoice, one of the best voices I have ever heard in person.  I experienced Leontyne Price, Luciano Pavarotti, Birgit Nilsson, and Jon Vickers, each a visceral experience for different reasons.  I feel I have to put Brownlee in a similar category.  Given the ability to edit recordings, or to choose from the best take, it’s important to recognize the drama of a live performance.  Brownlee nailed a whole series of high Cs (one for at least 5 seconds), never going off pitch, never sounding uncomfortable, always musical, and a complete thrill. No, it’s not the biggest voice I’ve ever heard (nor was Pavarotti come to think of it); but it’s perfect for this material.  See for yourself (either in this clip OR in person).

La Cenerentola will continue to bewitch us at the Four Seasons Theatre until May 25th.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | 7 Comments

La Clemenza di Tito

Marshall Pynkoski, co-artistic director of Opera Atelier

Marshall Pynkoski, co-artistic director of Opera Atelier

Let’s say you’re a devoted fan of a particular art form, such as Shakespeare’s plays, Fellini’s films or Gaugin’s paintings.  Then imagine that suddenly someone discovers a masterpiece by your favourite.  Can you imagine the joy to suddenly encounter a new work from your hero (Shakespeare, Fellini, Gaugin), in their prime?

That’s how i feel.  I had heard La Clemenza di Tito before.  The production I’ve experienced this week in Toronto from Opera Atelier is like a revelation.  A combination of a long rehearsal period, a scholarly approach to staging & music, the use of historically informed performance & instruments, have all stripped away the dust, revealing the masterpiece within.

The cast of six are strong both musically and dramatically.   The complex triangle between Sesto, Tito & Vitellia have a special chemistry.

Measha Brueggergosman’s Vitellia has the crazy seductiveness to start with.  Can you say “high maintenance?”  She demands that her admirer Sesto–who’s not yet her lover–should avenge her for being rejected by Tito, who is Caesar after all.  Vitellia can’t seem to make up her mind however:

  • when rejected she wants Sesto to kill Tito
  • but when Tito is single again, suddenly Vitellia wants Tito again, and demands that Sesto hold back his avenging rage: while observing her interest in the Emperor

Brueggergosman has the seductive chutzpah of a Carmen (including several remarkably improvisatory moments, in her a piacere reading of passages in “Deh se piacer mi vuoi,” her Act I aria) , blatantly demanding of her man and without any shame: at least until Sesto is tried and convicted of attempting to kill Tito. Even then her primary concern is that Sesto will spill the beans on her part in the plot, while her concern for Sesto’s life is an afterthought.

Michael Maniaci, Sesto in Opera Atelier's La Clemenza di Tito

Michael Maniaci, Sesto in Opera Atelier’s La Clemenza di Tito

Michael Maniaci? he understands the chemistry.  He is practically begging, totally dominated by this woman.  The part was written for castrato, which means that it’s often performed by a woman, whereas Maniaci –a male soprano– gives us both the authentic sounding vocal type AND the right gender.  Seeing the way Maniaci is pushed (and occasionally slapped) around by Brueggergosman’s Vitellia, it makes exquisite sense that their voices blend so perfectly.  While Maniaci is not a castrato, the subtext is there with Brueggergosman pushing the envelope as if Vitellia could be a dominatrix.  Musically and dramatically these two have an amazing rapport.

Kresimir Spicer plays the third member of the trio, namely Tito, Emperor of Rome.  I was very impressed by his accuracy marking (singing with only half voice) his big aria at the dress rehearsal two nights ago.  Tonight the same accuracy was there, plus ample heft when he wanted it.  When I think about why this opera is not more popular, i wonder if it’s limited by the availability of tenors who can actually sing Tito, a role calling for agility as well as more high notes than one usually encounters in a Mozart opera.  Spicer sang with wonderful pitch, lovely clarity in his coloratura, and a remarkable dynamic range.  At the same time that he faces the toughest singing of any cast member (in my opinion), Spicer was the rock holding the opera together with his passionate acting.

Mireille Lebel

Mireille Lebel, Annio in Opera Atelier’s La Clemenza di Tito

The other female character –Servilia– was played by Mireille Asselin, the virtuous foil to nasty Vitellia. Where the main trio are caught up in conspiracy, Servilia radiates goodness, particularly in Asselin’s reading.

Her virtuous partner is Annio, a man played by a woman.  Not only did Mireille Lebel bring flawless intonation & phrasing to her portrayal, but she helped decode some of the gender ambiguity in the simplest way: by being so tall.  Where some trouser parts are feebly enacted, Lebel’s stature and playfully aggressive body language gave a curious balance to Maniaci’s Sesto, in their jocular horseplay, or the way she towered over Asselin in their love duet, “Ah, perdona al primo affetto.”

My facebook friends already know I’m crazed for this tune, having posted two different versions today (when a melody is this good, i don’t mind if i can’t get it out of my head):

Popp with von Stade

Ivanova with Garanca

And finally, there’s Curtis Sullivan, a stalwart with Opera Atelier, as Publio. This role is a bit of a  challenge, because Publio is a complete abstraction without much clear subtext.  Sullivan played him with strength, barking at Tito a couple of times, otherwise a confidant or witness.

I observed –in my review of the dress-rehearsal— that Fallis & Pynkoski have a revolutionary approach to the recitatives.  It shouldn’t be such a radical idea, but it is: that there’s not a second of this reading that lets down in intensity.  It’s thoroughly  well-thought out, so that the relationships cohere perfectly, the love triangle balancing the virtuous duo, and all the singing-actors bringing their whole person to every note & word.

The sets & costumes by Gerard Gauci reinforce a period feel, by conjuring a curious mix of old & new; this is the Roman Empire dressed in the fashions of the Enlightment.

It all adds up to a spectacular new look at an opera that deserves to be in the standard repertoire.  Perhaps if more companies emulated the care lavished by director Marshall Pynkoski and conductor David Fallis, they might have similar breakthroughs of their own.

How fortunate for Torontonians that we get to see/hear them.

Opera Atelier’s production of La Clemenza di Tito continues at the Elgin Theatre until May 1st.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Mozart knew what he was doing

Mozart

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Yes I made a joke on my facebook status about the relevance of Mozart’s opera La Clemenza di Tito to anyone in a country uneasy about their government’s authoritarian tendencies, an ironic reference to Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove; Mozart’s opera might be subtitled “How I stopped worrying about tyranny and learned to love my Emperor”.  But it was more than a facetious attempt to make this opera topical.

Tito has had an image problem for a long time, an oddball in Mozart’s output.  Most great opera composers learn their craft gradually, finally hitting their stride with their final works; and so it is too with Mozart, except for the conspicuous exception of Tito The other operas produced in Mozart’s final years –The Magic Flute, and the three daPonte operas, Cosi fan Tutte, Don Giovanni and The Marriage of Figaro—are among the most popular operas of all.

Is Tito a lesser work; or have we simply misunderstood the opera all this time?  If ever an opera cried out for a rethinking via a historically informed approach it’s Tito.

Why hasn’t Tito achieved a comparable level of popularity to those other masterpieces?  Of course maybe it simply isn’t a masterpiece, just a hurried job by Mozart. but I don’t agree with this view.  More likely we didn’t understand how to approach the genre of opera seria (literally serious opera) in the right way; notice, though that I said “didn’t” because I have reason to be hopeful after what I saw tonight.

After Opera Atelier’s dress rehearsal, I am eager to get back for the opening Friday, when I will be thrilled to see it again.  There are several things about this production that contribute to its success.

First, there’s the problem of vocal types one chooses to employ.  The main characters can be done several ways:

  • TITO : tenor
  • SESTO: male soprano or counter-tenor or female soprano or mezzo-soprano
  • VITELLIA: soprano
  • ANNIO: soprano or mezzo–soprano
  • SERVILIA: soprano or mezzo-soprano
  • PUBLIO: bass

The same issue comes up in other well-known operas; the first one that pops into my head is Orfeo ed Euridice, where Orfeo is sometimes played by a woman to make the voice sound right, sometimes by a man to make the gender look right.  Opera Atelier’s choice to use Michael Maniaci (a male soprano) removes the convolutions imposed by attempts to modernize.

Second, there’s the simple matter of scale.  In a big opera house with a big modern orchestra, Tito quickly devolves into a scream-fest without subtlety.  Tonight we had

  • the charming sound of Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra
  • the Elgin Theatre, seating about 1500
  • Conductor David Fallis who believes in holding an orchestra properly in check so that you can easily hear the singers, even when they’re marking (as we heard at times tonight)
David Fallis

Conductor David Fallis

Third, there’s the rather difficult matter of drama.  Director Marshall Pynkoski and Fallis share credit for this (as well as the cast of course).  I had a bit of a revelation watching the recitatives tonight.  In most productions –especially opera seria—the recit is understood as connective tissue.  The singers tend to look past them to the aria or ensemble that follows, and the conductor doesn’t usually respect the rudimentary music contained in recit.  But Pynkoski and Fallis seem to get that the drama doesn’t stop just because the aria is over.  In fact some of the recitatives were so exciting –as moments of high drama between the principals—that they generated applause: the first time I have ever seen that kind of electricity sustained between numbers.

Above & beyond Opera Atelier’s usual beautiful bodies and Tafelmusik’s lovely sound, there’s the matter of the singers and their chemistry.

As with Mozart’s earlier opera seria Idomeneo, we meet most of the principals before encountering the title role, sung by a tenor.

Measha Brueggergosman

Soprano Measha Brueggergosman

There’s Vitellia, a classic scenery-chewing diva mad with jealousy, fearlessly played by Measha Brueggergosman.  We had the emotional blackmail, the bullying, the physicality (whether slapping or seducing), and the melodramatic facial expressions.  I loved her singing, especially her tendency to turn coloratura into something resembling a seductive jazz, toying with an entire theatre full of people hanging on her every note.  There’s no denying the star power, and also the ample voice she offered in a dress rehearsal complete with lots of high notes.  Whenever Measha was on stage she commanded our attention, whether her presence matters to that scene or not.  Her flamboyance is a necessary starting point.

Sesto is the pivotal player in the opera, the man so eager to please Vitellia that he’d kill his best friend, and in the process depose a king who is almost too good to be true.  If you can’t believe this dynamic – of a man pushed around by the irresistible female, driven to betrayal of all that he believes in—you may as well pack it in.  Michael Maniaci may have been holding some voice in reserve for opening night, but sounded at least alright, and sometimes quite wonderful.  The main thing was the passion of his portrayal, both in his relationship to Vitellia as well as with Tito.  I found that I genuinely cared about Sesto & Tito.  The tone between Maniaci & Brueggergosman sometimes edged towards comedy, in recognition that the key relationship of the opera is really the one between the two men.  There’s  a hint of a homo-erotic subtext in the ideal love between these two men; but i felt that the scenes between the two were quite beautiful, and showed restraint.

We also meet Mireille Lebel as Annio and Mireille Asselin as Servilia, counter-balancing all the anguish and melodrama of the chief love-triangle of the opera, showing us something genuinely sweet & worthwhile.

Spicer

Tenor Kresimir Spicer

Finally, the City of Rome welcomed Tito: and Kresimir Spicer stepped onto the stage.  While that scene seemed to play on the level of civic duty and right behaviour (Tito rejecting the generous gifts of his citizens, suggesting they use them instead to help the homeless victims of the Vesuvius eruption rather than himself), Spicer played the scene with his recent heartbreak as subtext.  Spicer brought a genuine sense of seriousness to the proceedings, the rock at the centre of this production; he was tightly wound, explosive but contained.

I found myself thinking afterwards that maybe we need to rediscover or reinvent opera seria, to find its truth for ourselves.  Opera Atelier’s La Clemenza di Tito looked and sounded wonderful, a taut piece of music theatre, and a display of many different sorts of beauty.  There was no concept overlaid onto the production, just a tight-knit group of performers trusting the excellence of the score, relying upon one another in a textbook example of ensemble musicianship.

In case anyone was in doubt, I feel they’ve confirmed that Mozart knew what he was doing.

Opera Atelier’s production of La Clemenza di Tito at the Elgin Theatre in Toronto opens Friday April 22nd, running until May 1st.

Posted in Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Woody & Frankie’s Bullet for Adolf

There came a moment when I discovered just how sincere and authentic Woody Harrelson & Frankie Hyman are about their new play Bullet for Adolf.

bullet for adoft

Tonight was the first preview in Toronto at Hart House Theatre, and afterwards they held a talkback session with the actors and audience.  I asked a question, and in the process may have offended Frankie, although I didn’t see Woody’s response.

Woody & Frankie

Woody Harrelson & Frankie Hyman

I guess it sounds weird to call them by their first names.  Woody? You probably know him from his film & TV work.  I think I had one of my biggest life lessons, courtesy Woody Harrelson.  When I used to watch Cheers, I didn’t really differentiate between “Woody” the actor and “Woody” the role portrayed on Cheers.  In my defense I point to the names being the same, and the uncanny goofiness Woody brought to Woody.

Let’s just say I underestimated the man: profoundly.  Watching Natural Born Killers was the real eye opener, a role for which I think he should have won the oscar.

But excuse me, I digress.  I was saying that my question may have offended Frankie.

My question was meant in all innocence.  I first observed how authentic the writing seemed to my ear.  I was nervous so I didn’t really say what I meant to say, about how the black people sounded authentically black, and vice versa.  The question may have seemed racist, as I more or less asked who wrote what, and whether they achieved that authenticity by ensuring that the white guy wrote the white guy lines, and vice versa.

I saw Frankie wince, possibly embarrassed, before he more or less confirmed what I’d asserted, possibly feeling my question was a faux pas.  I felt bad that I had called attention to the divisions that exist in society when, in the course of the play, the writers had done such a marvellous job of erasing those divisions.

In the pre-show publicity, Harrelson made a big deal about choosing Toronto as the site for this premiere.  I wondered about that.  Is it because we’re multi-cultural, and likely to be very comfortable with the sensitivities in the script? Possibly.

But then again the talk back was like a love-in.  It had been a very successful preview, two and a quarter hours of steady laughs from an audience delighted by what they’d seen and heard.  Torontonians love to be flattered, love to be told how cosmopolitan we are; so perhaps it was a done deal that the show would go over well.  But by the same token, we may be easy but we’re not cheap (or the theatre-going equivalent).  The laughs were genuine.

I don’t want to give anything away –as a devout believer in the spoiler-free review—but let me just say that the title contains a kernel of poetic truth that elevates the material beyond mere laughs.  The comedy is at times very edgy, challenging the audience’s willingness to laugh.  I found that aspect the most exciting, that this genuinely felt like a work of art rather than a commercial vehicle, even if there’s the possibility of a big-time payoff at the box office.

Bullet for Adolf is set in the early 1980s.  The production magically teleports into that time through a regular use of video, by Christian Peterson & Jeremy Hutton.  Between scenes we’d watch combinations of images & music taking us back to the big hair, the moves & music of the time.  Occasionally, just to see if we were paying attention, some of the characters from the play would turn up in those little vignettes. But this is a very self-conscious bit of time-travel from Woody & Frankie, in a play that at times resembles a flashback.

When I put this in context with the last two plays I saw –by a pair of Brits named Martin Crimp & David Greig—I can’t miss the difference.  Crimp & Greig are doing what modern theatre does well: express alienation and pain for the usual theatre-goer.  I was ready for a play that leaves you feeling good afterwards, and Harrelson/Hyman delivered.   Whereas I can’t imagine addressing either of the famous playwrights by their first names, it goes without saying that Bullet for Adolf is unpretentious, a play bordering on guileless in its eagerness to have fun.

But by the same token, the play does have an edge.  There’s a great deal of abrasion in some of the exchanges, a fair amount of conflict, and suspense too.  I quibble with the play’s subtitle (“almost a comedy”), because to my eye/ear it’s very much a comedy.

The preview went very smoothly with no muffed lines that I could recognize and some tightly choregraphed fights & dance, the physicality coming as a very welcome release.

There were no weak links among the performers.  Brandon Coffey’s Zach & Ronnie Rowe’s Frankie were always persuasive, particularly in their first bristling encounters in their workplace;  their mastery of physical labour—shovelling and climbing scaffolds—made the early scenes at work very believable.  Meghan Swaby as Shareeta was a force to be reckoned with, and never less than fascinating.

Bullet for Adolf runs until May 7th at Hart House Theatre in Toronto.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Reviews | 5 Comments