Celebrating Glenn Gould on the 90th Anniversary of His Birth

Celebrating the Enduring Legacy of Iconic Canadian
Pianist Glenn Gould on the 90th Anniversary of His Birth
GlennGould@90 features free events from September 17 to 27

Toronto, ON (August 29, 2022) – Glenn Gould, the iconic Canadian classical pianist, writer, composer, conductor and broadcaster, would have celebrated his 90th birthday on Sunday, September 25th, 2022. To commemorate this milestone anniversary, The Glenn Gould Foundation has programmed GlennGould@90, a series of free events starting September 17th honouring Canada’s futuristic musical maverick.

Despite his untimely death 40 years ago, Gould’s legacy as one of the most famous and celebrated pianists of the 20th century – a phenomenal, enigmatic and eccentric musical genius – continues to grow and attract legions of fans around the world. Glenn Gould’s career-launching 1955 recording of Bach’s Goldberg Variations is the best-selling solo classical instrumental album of all time and has never been out of release since it first dropped. Gould became “the first Canadian in Space” when his recording of the first Prelude from Book I of Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier was included on the “Golden Record” launched in 1977 aboard the Voyager 1 Space probe, now in interstellar space and currently 14.612 billion miles from Earth . . . and climbing!

Foreseeing the transformative impact of technology on the arts, communications and human society, Gould quit the concert stage at the height of his career in 1964, and devoted the rest of his life to the use of technology to perfect his art, and refine and express his visionary ideas. He was a prophet of the information age.

GlennGould@90

Glenn Gould Street Tribute!
Saturday, September 17

Glenn Gould’s music will permeate the streets of Toronto as the Glenn Gould School’s 2021-22 Quartet-in-Residence, The Dior String Quartet, performs 5 pop-up concerts in various downtown locations and enchants the public with Gould’s favourite works. The Dior String Quartet includes Noa Sarid (violin), Tobias Elser (violin), Caleb Georges (viola), and Joanne Yesol Choi (cello).

Day of Gould Celebrations
Saturday, September 24 from 11:00 AM to 9:30 PM
Isabel Bader Theatre, 93 Charles Street West
FREE ADMISSION

This day of celebrations includes film screenings, panel discussions, Artificial Intelligence technology demonstrations and concerts. Visit www.glenngould.ca for full program details.

11:00 AM Film Screening Glenn Gould: The Russian Journey and Panel Discussion
This documentary by director Yosif Feyginberg about 24-year-old Glenn Gould’s galvanizing 1957 concerts in Moscow and Leningrad at the height of the Cold War features Glenn Gould, Mstislav Rostropovich, and Vladimir Ashkenazy. Following the film, a panel discussion on the geopolitical importance of cultural diplomacy and soft power during times of global conflict like these. Panelists include Janice Stein of the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy and internationally celebrated architect Jack Diamond.

1:30 PM Concert World Premiere of The Lord of Toronto, His Pavin
The concert features the world premiere of The Lord of Toronto, His Pavin, a specially commissioned work for cello and piano dedicated to Glenn Gould by Canadian composer and cellist Daniel Hass, and Bach’s Sonata in G-minor for Cello and Keyboard, BWV 1029. Performing with Daniel Hass is pianist Kevinn Ahfat.

2:45 PM Artificial Intelligence Demonstration Canadian Premiere of Dear Glenn
Developed by Yamaha Japan in consultation with The Glenn Gould Foundation, Dear Glenn, a deep-learning technology has analyzed the elements of Gould’s performing style and can produce a performance of virtually any repertoire – delivered in the style of Glenn Gould (including music never performed by Gould in his lifetime). Prepare for a close encounter with the spirit of Gould!

3:15 PM Panel Discussion: The Implications of Artificial Intelligence for the Future of Music and Human Creativity
Are creative artists an endangered species? Panelists include Edward Jones-Imhotep, Director of the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, and Akira Maezawa PhD (Informatics), Yamaha researcher in music information retrieval and statistical audio signal processing.

3:45 PM Presentation: Glenn Gould’s Technology Legacy…Classical Music Meets TikTok
In tribute to Glenn Gould’s everlasting fascination with technology, cellist and popular TikTok artist Andrew Ascenzo leads a demonstration to show how classical music can thrive in the TikTok universe.

4:30 PM Film Screening The Goldberg Variations
This 1981 film by Bruno Monsaingeon documents Gould’s historic second traversal of this monument of musical literature. Our screening is introduced by Tim Page, Pulitzer-Prize winning critic for The New York Times and Washington Post, a fast friend of Glenn Gould’s and editor of The Glenn Gould Reader.

7:30 PM Concert: Leila Josefowicz
Canadian-American violinist Leila Josefowicz is a passionate advocate of contemporary music for the violin. Winner of a 2008 MacArthur Fellowship and the 2018 Avery Fisher Prize, she regularly performs with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, San Francisco Symphony, NAC Orchestra, Oslo Philharmonic, Dresdner Philharmonie and Budapest Festival Orchestra. The concert program includes Matthias Pintscher’s La Linea Evocativa: A Drawing for Violin Solo and Bach’s Partita for Violin Solo No. 2 in D minor, BWV 1004.

Announcement of the 14th Glenn Gould Prize Laureate
Sunday, September 25 at Noon ET
Leslie and Anna Dan Galleria, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, 273 Bloor Street West

On the 90th anniversary of Glenn Gould’s birth, an international jury panel chaired by legendary producer Bob Ezrin will announce the winner of the fourteenth Glenn Gould Prize at a news conference in Toronto. The $100,000 prize celebrates artistic excellence, innovation, and humanitarianism. The free event is open to the public and will be livestreamed at www.glenngould.ca.

Alma Deutscher and The Glenn Gould Festival Orchestra
Sunday, September 25 at 2 PM
Koerner Hall, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, 273 Bloor Street West

Enjoy a 21st century example of Gouldian youthful musical genius, as seventeen-year-old composer, violinist, pianist and conductor Alma Deutscher conducts The Glenn Gould Festival Orchestra in a concert of her own music. Soloists include Alma Deutscher (violin, piano) Vania Chan (soprano) and Noah Kostas (bari-tenor). Alma Deutscher began playing the piano when she was two, the violin at three and started composing at four. At the age of ten, she wrote a full-length opera, Cinderella, which has been produced on three continents to sold-out houses. Tickets to the Alma Deutscher concert are free and can be reserved in advance, as of September 6th, through the RCM Box Office at www.rcmusic.com or by phone at 416-408-0208.

GlennGould@90 at TIFF Cinematheque
Tuesday, September 27
TIFF Bell Lightbox, 350 King Street West

Presented in partnership with the Toronto International Film Festival, this special tribute features five screenings and a live conversation with director François Girard. Glenn Gould NFB Film Shorts screenings at 12:00 PM are free and include: Glenn Gould – On the Record (1959), a 30-minute documentary following Gould in New York City directed by Wolf Koenig and Roman Kroitor; Glenn Gould – Off the Record (1959), a short documentary at Gould’s lakeside cottage, directed by Wolf Koenig and Roman Kroitor; and Spheres (1969), an animated short by Norman McLaren and René Jodoin set to the music of Bach performed by Glenn Gould. The 3:00 PM screening of Slaughterhouse-Five (1972), a compelling anti-war saga directed by George Roy Hill, marked Gould’s first foray into film scoring. The 6:00 PM free screening of Thirty Two Short Films about Glenn Gould (1993) is one of the most successful Canadian films of all time, directed by Francois Girard and starring Colm Feore as Gould. The event begins with a live piano performance and includes a post-screening Q&A with Francois Girard. Tickets to all screenings can be reserved in advance at https://am.ticketmaster.com/tiff/buy#/

The Glenn Gould Foundation gratefully acknowledges the support of the Department of Canadian Heritage, Power Corporation of Canada, BMO Financial, an Anonymous Donor, many individual donors, and media sponsor, The Globe and Mail. The Glenn Gould Foundation also acknowledges TIFF, the Royal Conservatory of Music, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, and Victoria University.

About The Glenn Gould Foundation
The Glenn Gould Foundation celebrates the life, career, and enduring influence of Canadian pianist, writer and broadcaster Glenn Gould. Every two years, the Foundation convenes an international jury to award the Glenn Gould Prize to a living individual for a unique lifetime contribution that has enriched the human condition through the arts. Past laureates of the international prize include documentary filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin (2020), Jessye Norman (2018), Leonard Cohen (2011), El Sistema founder Dr. José Antonio Abreu (2008), Yo-Yo Ma (1999), and Oscar Peterson (1993). For more information visit www.glenngould.ca.

*******

Press releases and announcements” are presented verbatim without comment

Posted in Press Releases and Announcements | Leave a comment

Tanya’s Secret

Tanya’s Secret, a queer-trans Onegin, is a new adaptation of Eugene Onegin by Opéra Queens, that opened tonight at the Betty Oliphant Theatre.

Let’s begin by remembering Tchaikovsky’s original: a piece full of beautiful melodies, a few wonderful arias, several glorious dances, that plays like a cautionary tale about relationships.

Tatyana (should we call her Tanya?) boldly comes on to Onegin, who doesn’t reciprocate and breaks her heart in the process.

Bored world-weary Onegin dances a bit too much with vivacious Olga, at least in the jealous eyes of Lensky her main squeeze: leading Lensky to challenge Onegin to a duel.

Onegin kills Lensky.

And then years later Onegin meets Tatyana, now married to Gremin. This time Onegin throws himself at Tatyana. While she does admit to feelings for Onegin, she loves her partner, breaking Onegin’s heart.

Yes the story comes from Pushkin, whose sexual orientation isn’t known (NB Google is inconclusive on the topic). But given that Tchaikovsky is usually understood as a gay composer, the opera is ideal for the kind of exploration undertaken by Mike Fan | 范祖铭 (they) aka Tanya Smania (she), Opéra Queens’ artistic director. I’m still trying to wrap my head around what I saw and heard in this new version.

What’s different from the usual Onegin?

For starters Mike aka Tanya undertakes the role of Tatyana, dressed physically as a girl / woman, but underplayed. It’s not “drag” as you might know from watching Too Wong Foo or Priscilla Queen of the Desert. This isn’t like Dame Edna, not over the top, not played for laughs. To do so would dishonour Tchaikovky and the credibility of the project. As made clear in the interview they did earlier this week, it’s almost a sacred project.

We’re given some time to get accustomed to the illusion: and it does work. While Mike aka Tanya don’t always manage the music Tchaikovsky composed for his young diva, the dramatic side is remarkable. This is the most vulnerable Tatyana I’ve ever seen, exposed because after all the illusion is not perfect, even as we watch Mike aka Tanya in p.j.’s, pouring their heart out in a love letter to Onegin. We’re in a very theatrical space where we compensate for what’s not quite there. While I’m not sure, I believe Mike aka Tanya is singing the role as a tenor, hitting some very high notes, and from my ignorant point of view at least, enunciating their Russian quite well.

Yes it’s in Russian except when it’s in French plus some added Ukrainian poetry / songs. I’m not sure about the language, but I would assume it’s authentic. The inserted Ukrainian content sung powerfully by Douglas Graham was an interesting bonus, a lovely gesture in response to current politics.

I will speak of the remainder of the cast, mindful that I might get their pronouns wrong. Mike aka Tanya is not the only one playing a part cross-gender from the usual.

Mike aka Tanya and Georgios Iatrou (Photo: Elana Emer, Lighting: Mikael Kangas)

Georgios Iatrou is Onegin, singing the role in the usual baritone register. Iatrou is a vocal standout, the music pouring out effortlessly, including lots of high notes. He is compelling, making me believe everything that he is doing, whether as the Byronesque object of Tatyana’s affections, the shit-disturber hitting on Olga, then duelling with & killing his friend Lensky, and finally when he is smitten with Tatyana in the last scenes. As you can tell I was very impressed.

Tonight’s Lensky was Christina Yun, putting a new spin on the role by singing it as a soprano. Watching the portrayal I felt the artificiality of this staging foregrounds the curious dynamics of the relationships we’re watching. We’re told Lensky is a poet, a romantic. And in such a modern emotional landscape Lensky seems to be an anachronism, a foolish relic over-reacting to what happens at the party. Of course that’s how the part is written, but he seems especially out-dated while Onegin was ahead of his time.

Another ingredient that’s a bit different is Olga, tonight portrayed by Corinne DeJong. Onegin responds to her at the party. DeJong made her vivacious and confident, which made Lensky’s reaction seem especially unfortunate.

There were several other performers making excellent contributions. Catherine Carew was Gremin, singing a part usually given to a bass, and sounding heroic going (I think) well below middle C. Prince Gremin seemed to be male but sung by contralto Carew. And on the other side, Carew was Madame Larina, the doting mom to Tatyana and Olga.

Filipyevna the nurse was portrayed tonight by Dr J Marchand Knight, always interesting to watch whether singing or not. I think they made everyone sharing the stage a little better, a little more confident and ready to enjoy themselves. Rain Senavinin made more out of Monieur Triquet than usual, interpolating some extra notes, and confidently winning our hearts in the Drag Ball that opens the last act. Every performance was improved by being put at ease, having huge fun especially in the shenanigans of the Drag Ball. It was the most entertaining version of that scene I’ve ever seen. I think Tchaikovsky would approve (privately!) even if he was usually constrained in his public statements.

I recommend this to anyone able to come to the theatre Sunday afternoon, where the roles cited as “tonight” will be undertaken by someone different. No it’s not exactly what Tchaikovky wrote. But it’s vivid, wonderful theatre. I recommend it. (click here for ticket info)

Posted in Books & Literature, Dance, theatre & musicals, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Interviewing Mike Fan | 范祖铭 (they) aka Tanya Smania (she): probing Tatyana’s Secret

I’m intrigued by the upcoming production of Tanya’s Secret produced by Opera Queens, an adaptation of Eugene Onegin, a work that seems to invite questions.

Mike Fan | 范祖铭 (they) aka Tanya Smania (she) is the artistic director and driving force behind this upcoming exploration of Tchaikovsky’s best-known opera. (click here for ticket info)

Currently I’m thinking a lot about gender in the arts. For instance Shakespeare in Love (seen a few nights ago) seems suddenly an apt prep for Sky Gilbert’s Titus set to premiere next week. Lurking in the Hollywood film is something transgressive. Doing the play as we now do it with a woman playing Juliet violates the rules for Shakespeare’s time. Juliet was written to be performed by a man. Having women do it –as they did in the film and as we now do it—breaks the rules, even if for 2022 it’s still wild to imagine a male Juliet.

Could be we have it upside down.

Full disclosure. I enjoy singing repertoire usually reserved for women. It began petulantly when I noticed how women routinely sing song cycles written for men such as Mahler’s Songs of a Wayfarer, while the reverse never seems to happen. Is it possibly because these songs often sound better with a female voice soaring above the staff? Don’t answer that! Back in 1999 I did a concert at the University of Toronto with counter-tenor Mathieu Marcil commemorating the 50th anniversary of the death of Richard Strauss. Mathieu sang four of Strauss’s earliest compositions, songs that seemed apt for his counter-tenor voice given that Strauss composed them all before puberty. To close I sang the Four Last Songs (normally sung by women). Our bookends were in effect Strauss’s first and last songs. I also played the piano…

Men have boldly presumed to compose music purporting to speak with a woman’s voice, at least in the centuries when women couldn’t get their music performed. I’m sure it’s not wrong to stand in for the voice of a male composer, even as we wonder which gender is being signified. No I’m not trying to confuse you, just pointing to the ambiguities that are already there, to confound and torment us with mixed gender signals, coding that often seems meant to lead us astray rather than to properly guide us. At the end of the day we see opera as a playful form, with more life & vitality than we expected, lots yet to be explored.

I’m grateful to be interviewing Mike Fan | 范祖铭 (they) aka Tanya Smania (she), the busy artistic director of Opera Queens (website), seeking insights into so many fascinating questions about their upcoming adaptations of opera, captured in their spare moments in the hours before their show goes on later this week.

barczablog: Are you more like your father or your mother?

Mike aka Tanya: Interesting question! Growing up my dad was not home much busy finishing his Doctorate while I was in embryo and then the post-doc trek that brought us from Alberta to Indiana, Texas and then Ontario where we landed when my father got his position at the University of Guelph. I hope he doesn’t mind me saying, I spent a lot more time with my mother growing up and think I subconsciously resented him for a while. It wasn’t till later when I myself became rather busy and started being less available to my loved ones that I realized it is just the necessity of growing any career in an ambitious way. I definitely inherited that from my father, the ambition. My mother too. Also from my father — the keen research mind and visionary spirit. So I see a lot of myself in mother who has been a huge presence in my life – in terms of responsibility.

Mike aka Tanya clutching the letter (Photo by Elana Emer, Lighting by Mikael Kangas)

barczablog: What is the best or worst thing about what you do?

Mike aka Tanya: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” as they say indeed! I have walked through many dark times in my life so in general I’d say fortunately for me generally things have turned out for the better. Or, rather my perspective on life changed as I began to discover my true self and embrace it rather than run from it. I’m very much “swimming downstream rather than upstream” if that makes sense. But I do lead a quite crazy life.

Generally especially in these pandemic years I’ve had the great privilege of performing most of the time in opera, art song, film, and theatre – role after role (or sometimes 4 at a time in my recent “Qui as tué Leclair” project with Infusion Baroque) as well as teaching, hosting, and advocacy but with Opéra Queens I also produce as Artistic and Executive Director – meaning I do most things from casting to bookkeeping and grant-writing, booking venues to washing microwaves. It’s only our 2nd year and we’ve managed to receive nearly $200,000 in grants and brought many on seasonally on our productions, but ultimately we’re not yet at the point where we have operating grants so it’s a lot on my plate.

I’m the ambitious type if you haven’t yet discovered so rather than sing a small role and do it all I undertake something like, you know – Tatyana, which is a lot of singing and not just in the Letter Scene in a complex Slavic language as well as do it all. This rehearsal run we’re having I think probably takes the cake in terms of being the best and worst of times. This role is something I feel that I could sing every night of my life and that was truly destined for me – yet a lot of days I’m sleeping 3 hours a day, rehearsing for up to 6 as a singer and spending another 6-8 doing admin and overseeing rehearsals. Somehow though – because it feels exactly where I’m meant to be it feels right, it feels aligned – it feels fated (a theme in Onegin as well, fittingly) and somehow feels much easier and fun overall than other chapters of my life – as a budding concert pianist or a premed student for example. I think my life now really embodies the “if you love what you do you never work a day in your life.”

Not to say it isn’t without challenges or difficulties (especially under COVID-19 no less – I think our cast now is at least 50% different than when we embarked on “Tanya’s Secret” 2 years ago) but I feel that when I am living and working with the grain things fall into place much more effortlessly despite the energy and work involved. So, I have a great appreciation that there is no light without shadow nor tree without soil. After trying on many wrong hats, as overwhelming, demanding, and frustrating as this life I lead now is, it’s ultimately just right for me – good, bad, and ugly. I accept it all because I understand what it is to “have it all” on paper and still be unhappy.

barczablog: Who do you like to listen to or watch?

Mike aka Tanya: I think our connotation of my company “Opéra Queens” takes on more of the regal, queer, elegant sense of the word but indeed it stems from the bygone era of “gays at the opera”. Even within young classical singers today of my generation I feel that many aren’t interested in going to the opera, listening to recordings, etc. Which is fine – but I’ve always been an old soul. Onegin was actually my first opera at 13 and I felt this innate connection and kinship. I’m weird like that. So I’m very much opera opera opera 24/7 – give me the latest opera recording, ticket, book, magazine, gossip, it’s truly an obsession for me. I’m much more prone to sing all of Violetta by heart than Lizzo – I give the impression that I’m young and hip sometimes but truly I’m an intelligent and an excellent actor. Most are quite surprised that I don’t know most pop music at all – I’m a true classical nut!

That said I’m quite a voracious sapiophile – I found that I’m quite drawn to world and folk music, particularly bossa nova and Latin music. I also of course am partial to traditional Chinese music – pipa, erhu, and guzheng for example are some of the most ethereal sounds on earth in my opinion. Jazz is lovely and I musical theatre has its moments. But I’m truly an Opéra Queen through and through – I find I’m very drawn to sopranos those active particularly in the 50s-80s – Callas, Tebaldi, Vishnevskaya, Kyra Vayne. The inner diva in me come to life I suppose.

That said I’m rather eclectic – makes sense for someone who speaks 7 languages, lived in 5 cities before 1st grade, and who has degrees in Opera and Voice, Piano, and Speech Arts and Drama Performance as well Biomedical Science…I love a good documentary, sitcom, depressing indie flick, rom-com, historical drama – and I do enjoy trashy reality TV and YouTubers. I think rather than a release it’s the inner life coach in me – I find human behaviour fascinating. Either when we are on best behaviour or our worst. Perhaps in the end always leading back to my life onstage…?!

barczablog: What ability or skill do you wish you had, that you don’t have?

Mike aka Tanya: I’m tremendously gifted I must say, thanks to the Divine Creator, my parents, and my mentors. I proudly say this because most my life I thought it was quite the opposite and was derided by classmates, bullies, and even teachers and “mentors”. I’m a freak in a way but it took me a while to realize that it was a positive thing – if I channel for good, of course.

However, as with my voice we must know our strengths and our weaknesses. I am stubborn, a workaholic, exceedingly ambitious, extremely sensitive, a terror when provoked, and love eating too much and moving far too little. I have a lot of energy but it also means I often can’t sleep and need to work myself to exhaustion before I can have a few nights good sleep and resume the cycle. So I guess there’s much to address with this fixer-upper – but isn’t that all of us? Self-knowledge and awareness I think is more important than pining after any mythical perfection. I’m perfectly imperfectly as we all are and isn’t that swell? That said, being anywhere anytime whether teleportation or the ability to fly would be fantastic. I love learning about and seeing the world and other cultures and especially in the pandemic – flying has certainly been easier. Also, have you met the TTC?

barczablog: When you’re just relaxing and not working, what is your favourite thing to do?

Mike aka Tanya: Hahahahahaha…see above! Honestly though, I’m at a point where I really see the need to say no and to carve out time for me. I have a lovely, supportive family who I don’t see nearly enough and it’s lovely to sit down for dinner and tell each other about our various exploits. Mine are more exotic and far-reaching perhaps but ultimately due to everything we’ve been through together we have an intimacy I don’t think I have with most. I also have some dear friends connected at the soul with whom we always spend hours together in a blink of an eye. Always something to talk about and the time apart means we have many things to celebrate and commiserate.

I also have the loveliest partner and kitty who remind me that I do have a reason to make space beyond performing, producing, making income, etc. He is delightfully chill and creative but not an artist per se – we love simple things like watching TV, grocery shopping (we both loooove food), and exploring Toronto. The first 3 years of our relationship we were mostly in different cities so it’s just nice to be together mostly day in, day out. I make a lot of noise so when I’m out of town he’s not unhappy either! Of course, I love to go to the opera, the ballet, concerts – whether hearing a busker or a concerto with orchestra – as I said before I’m a culture nut. Oh, and I love museums! I think I would be content living in one. I read all the captions which is an absolute horror for anyone I go with but I’m very studious and detail-oriented.

I am fortunate to live by the water which has always been a dream – I love to walk along the boardwalk and see the ships, the gulls, the islands – it’s very inspiring and I haven’t gotten to do it as much in the summer, at least in the daytime. I think I worked so hard over the years to cover up my unhappiness and my insecurities but I think I’ve arrived at a point where I’m fortunate enough to love what I do and to love the life and people I have beyond what I do. An embarrassment of riches!

barczablog: Please think about what Opéra Queens, the Toronto indie opera company, aims to achieve. If you’d like to give us a manifesto or a lecture on your goals & ideals that would be welcome. And tell us (if possible) what’s next after this show.

Mike aka Tanya: First, I must say, I began Opéra Queens in my Masters in Opera & Voice Performance at McGill’s Schulich School of Music in Montréal so we began there and still maintain an active presence there! So I’d say that’s one big aim – to connect these two relatively close metropolises of Toronto and Montréal which are relatively close but often disconnected culturally. “Tanya’s Secret” is our real first mainstage show in Toronto but also our largest so far (and perhaps ever) so it’s exciting getting to bring our magic here.

I like to say Opéra Queens presents opera “in full colour” in every sense of the word. That means with majority queer-trans and IBPOC / BIPOC cast and crew where possible as well as the music we perform and commission. However, beyond those viewpoints I also am interested in creating paid opportunities for other marginalized groups – countertenors, big voices, plus-sized and differently-abled bodies – how can we provide them all an opportunity to have their glory in the rainbow? As someone Chinese-Canadian, 2nd generation immigrant, queer, and non-binary – I’m pleased and utterly surprised at the mostly positive reception and enthusiasm we’ve received so far. I was bullied in my early life for the things that made me “weird and different” and as America Ferrera says in her TED Talk – “my identity is my superpower – not an obstacle”.

I’m pleased to say that we do have Canada Council for the Arts funding for a production “Night of 1000 Cleopatras” slated for Summer 2022 in Montréal. There is time to find a way to bring it to Toronto too but we’ll see what’s possible. We’re presenting both known and rare Cleopatra scenes, arias, and art songs from Händel to Leroux, Massenet to Barber as well as a new commission “Cleopatra Built” on E. E. Cummings by Dr. J. Marchand Knight. We premièred scenes from the opera this past May at the Watershed Festival at Queens University – appropriately named, I must say!

Last summer we also filmed two digital productions “Drama Queens” and “Latin Night”. It’s truly been a year of hard work of post-production but we should be ready to release this Fall at last! We presented scenes from both shows in Montréal and hope to bring them to Toronto too but in the meantime the world will get an opportunity to experience works by Viardot, Malibran, von Martines, Serpa, Cilèa, Saint-Saëns, Bizet, and more! Maintaining our virtual audiences is so key because we have so many that joined us for Zoom shows, podcasts, and pre-recorded performances in the pandemic and especially for queer-trans folx – the anonymity, privacy, and accessibility the online world affords is wonderful! Hoping to help tear down that stigma of “online content” – live performance is great but it’s all about options!

barczablog: Does this kind of art (eg the Onegin adaptation) give us an opportunity to discuss gender without framing it as a lecture or essay? Is exploring this subject via theatre a way to avoid pretentiousness and even to be playful and unpretentious: a change from what opera sometimes is (for non-opera types)

Mike aka Tanya: That’s the intention! A lot of it we want to speak for itself. The soul is the soul. When I sing Tatyana as a tenor in drag, she is still a young girl looking for love, bookish, and intelligent, passionate, yet dignified – all things I like to think I am as well. Christina Yun who sings Lensky is a soprano – yet why is a soprano not also passionate, foolhardy, and goes to her death bravely? Opera has a long tradition of gender-bending and drag – but why has it only been relegated to middle-aged mezzos singing teenage boys? I mean, the straight male patriarchy is definitely a reason. But we at Opéra Queens seek to expand the possibilities of classical music – which seems avant garde but it’s really bringing us to where all the other art forms have gone – including ballet. Billy Porter as the Fairy Godmother? Kinky Boots? Hello opera, it’s time!

And I love this question – some of my mentors especially thought or continue to think that something like Opéra Queens is meant to mostly be a parody or light-hearted endeavour. Yes, we do have our moments – you’ll see in “Latin Night” what edible objects I use in Carmen’s Habañera besides oranges – but ultimately we seek to expand who’s onstage, what’s onstage, and how it’s presented without compromising the substance and artistic quality. In the same way that a mezzo singing Cherubino doesn’t affect the Countess’s sorrow or a soprano singing Oscar doesn’t impede the plight of Amelia and Gustavo’s illicit romance – queer-trans and BIPOC art can and should be taken seriously too.

Drag and gender-bending have often been taken in a comedic way, particularly when male-presenting artists inhabit the feminine – but there are valid stories to be told that aren’t. And stereotypes need to be questioned and shattered. I shouldn’t only be singing Pings, Pangs, and Pongs as an Asian or relegated only to the “gay stuff” as a queer performer. I like all of us am a multiplicity of things, complex and shallow, happy and wounded, intelligent yet clumsy. Straight white performers have had the luxury of playing all the roles available in the West, even ones that don’t necessarily “belong” to them. We ask: and us? And when we do, do we need to be a joke? Or can you listen to our stories our way and see that we are also humans with the same beating heart, the same smiles as well as tears?

barczablog: Do you see yourself getting new audiences, those who don’t know opera in the usual ways, or would you rather play to audiences who know opera in the usual ways: but who will be surprised by your approach?

Mike aka Tanya: I hope so! So far it’s been incredibly rewarding and worth the long hours when we find there are those totally new to opera and classical music in our audiences! After a Schulich 5à7 show we did at Tanna Hall in Montréal a jazz major came up to me and said, “I’ve always felt alienated and uncomfortable to go to classical concerts, but seeing your face on the poster – someone that looked like me and on stage persuaded me – and I loved it!

Tanya’s secret ensemble (Photo by Elana Emer, Lighting by Mikael Kangas)

We’ve had people literally shaking with excitement after our shows because they had never seen themselves reflected in such a personal way or were just excited to see repertoire old and new performed in a groundbreaking way. In fact, one of those is Alexander Cappellazzo, one of our Lenskys whom I met in Montréal after our Kin Experience concert and whose enthusiasm was a surprise and delight to me!

As well, we opened our first auditions this year and received numerous applications from across the world – many of whom unfortunately we don’t have the budget for yet but give me lots of inspiration for future grants and projects! So much of the time we’ve heard, “We’re so glad this exists…We don’t have this where I live…I’m closeted and live in a traditional, religious, conservative town where I could never do this.” I had no idea the scale and impact that I would have created with Opéra Queens. I began it as something that I saw needed to create space for my identity and vision but it’s incredibly rewarding to see it go beyond myself. Isn’t that the greatest bliss – to know that our work reaches beyond one moment, one concert, one person – and into the lives, minds, and souls of others, to brighten their lives and help them feel seen, heard, and valued? As a mentor once told me prior to this whole Opéra Queens adventure – “I think you’ve found the M-word – your Ministry”. I may not be preaching, but I’ve find a Greater Purpose beyond myself – a privilege and honour I don’t take lightly.

barczablog: Opera is this costumed over the top medium, where the characters don’t resemble normal people. Can you talk about camp and drag at the opera, and why gay & transpersons might feel naturally drawn to the medium?

Mike aka Tanya: Exactly – isn’t this just a pairing that’s so natural?? And yet so underdone? So often I’ve felt and I know many of us QT persons feel so marginalized and under-represented at the opera as a concert-goer, performer, or crew member because we’re often subjected to the rules and limits of a traditional canon that force us to conform. Very colonial, yes? I’ve been told to “sit straighter” (as in more like a straight man, not more upright), “take out the camp”, etc. Which all makes sense if we’re aiming for a certain characterization and concept but…when do we get our turn? Even with newly commissioned operas – how often do we see two men kissing onstage in opera? Non-binary representation? Trans people who aren’t being abused? Even in mainstream media? Opera as you say is truly excess and isn’t queer-trans expression so often about being loud and proud, bold and beautiful? It’s a luxury we get to do this Canada and to be more of who we are here – and why our mission to raise funds for Kyiv Pride through our production embodies our wish that the world and in the sphere of “Tanya’s Secret” in particular in Eastern Europe that everyone will one day have the basic human right of existing as they are without persecution.

barczablog: Tell us more about your production.

Mike aka Tanya: I sing Tatyana as my drag diva persona Tanya Smania (named for Tatyana – so this is a real dream role for me). Among the highlights are baritone Georgios Iatrou who’s flown from Greece to sing his first Onegin and whose drag persona Nina Naï is fabulous in her own right! Lenskys Christina and Alexander have been mentioned – mezzo Catharin Carew is both my mother and lover Larina and Gremin – not our original intention but a rather Game of Thrones development given the pandemic. Olga is shared by Corinne DeJong and LA-based baritone Louise Floyd. Nurse is sung by treble Zwischenfach Dr. J. Marchand Knight (first mezzo role after a life mostly as a coloratura soprano) and Corinne on her other night. Thai countertenor Rain Saran Senavinin joins us as Triquet and we have lots of lovely singers in our Ensemble and who’ve been joining us internationally via Zoom as covers!

We have two Maestras leading the charge from the piano – Cecilia Nguyen Tran and Tina Faye. We have Egyptian-Canadian stage director Bridget Ramzy – who by the way I’m excited to have direct our Cleopatra show next year! I’m sure she will have fascinating insights. We have it fully staged and costumed in the gorgeous Betty Oliphant Theatre via the National Ballet School – with some twists of course. There is no chorus but we’ve turned many of them into ensembles. Ukrainian songs by Lysenko will be sprinkled in the first half – a contemporary of Tchaikovsky’s and reflecting Tchaikovsky’s Ukrainian roots and ties. Our aim in this time of conflict to ask what are borders? And could we love and unite rather than hate and divide more often? What would the world look like then? Rather than bringing on someone for costumes, not only for budget but to unleash our queer creativity – we’ve managed to snag some pretty fascinating lewks, especially in Act 3 which we’re setting as a drag ball!

barczablog: Do you have strong ideas about the work, meaning Pushkin’s poem and Tchaikovsky’s adaptation?

Mike aka Tanya: I really don’t think so – as “cutting edge” as our “Tanya’s Secret” adaptation is I think we’re really going back to what Tchaikovsky as a gay man likely would have wanted – to express his desires openly. The relationship with Onegin and Lensky is highly homoerotic and the acting out Onegin does throughout the show indicates to me a high degree of repression and closeting.

Also, titling our adaptation “Tanya’s Secret” is not simply a vanity placeholder (though it is nice to be the leading lady diva at last) – Tchaikovsky originally did want to name the opera Tatyana! But – it would still have been too innovative for the time, given that it was based on such an iconic novel as well. But the bias is clear – the fact that Tatyana gets all the memorable leit-motifs, that 12-14 minute Letter Scene, the massive 1.5 hour first act tipped in her viewpoint – it’s clear that Tchaikovsky put his passion and desires that he couldn’t expressed openly through her. A form of compositional drag. Also, it’s a way to uplift the Divine Feminine – in an art form when women are often abused, misunderstood, and ignored. In Act I in particularly we really wanted to highlight the sisterhood and togetherness of the four leading ladies and their relationships – which Bridget and I have not always felt depicted with great detail or sensitivity. Perhaps because diversity needs to happen with stage directing and behind-the-scenes work as well as onstage!

barczablog: It’s an opera with party scenes and large dance set-pieces that may be difficult or impossible to include, an opera full of social behaviour, posturing, actions and responses (sometimes suave, sometimes crude & rude).

Mike aka Tanya: This can be true and something I immediately thought of – though one day Met Opera, ROH, COC, etc. – if you offer us an orchestra and your stage and production team, we are happy to go all the way! I said I was ambitious. At the same time with much of indie opera – I think our mission is to tell the stories that need to be told – focussing on the message rather than simply the production value. Sure, it’s lovely to have a glamorous, splashy Zeffirelli production – but does it offer commentary on our life today? How we’ve evolved as a culture and civilization? There are so many possibilities that we’ve yet to see.

We’re lucky to have a swift yet talented Ensemble and off-night soloists that help fill our stage. At the same time, the individual storylines are so much more highlighted – especially telling multiple queer-trans storylines that can get lost in big crowds. And we afford our artists the ability to tell their stories in a more individual and personal way, self-agency and creative license is I think an integral part of queerness – or really being an artist in general, because we leave the door open for those who are simply great allies, questioning, etc.

In the end whether it’s 5 or 50 people, humanity is humanity in its beauty and terror. In particular, we weren’t so keen to depict the “traditional Orthodox Russian” staging you see especially given the times – but rather the rural/suburban/metropolitan queer identity and who it may change. Act I is a traditional, conservative, rural small town evolving into a try-hard awkward Sweet Sixteen party gone wrong in Act 2 to a swanky and perhaps superficial Drag Ball in Act 3. The dance pieces you’ll hear aren’t staged with a corps de ballet but we do interesting things with them that definitely tell our story

barczablog : Talk about Peter Tchaikovsky’s sexuality and how that changes your reading of the opera.

Mike aka Tanya: As I’ve said, this close relationship between the leading men Onegin and Lensky is so tantalizing. In our production, Tatyana as a young trans girl means that her feelings of being isolated and misunderstood ring more truly. I’ve always felt this sense of nostalgia and bitter-sweetness in this music so close to my heart as a melancholy young queer person and I think it makes so much sense in this queer-trans context. In terms of how everyone is costumed too – it gives them a chance to butch or femme themselves up. We’re liberated from aspiring to the heteronormative settings of most operas and that it’s sanctioned in a way by Tchaikovsky’s identity. That didn’t stop us from tackling Carmen, Agrippina, Samson et Dalila, etc. but it does add a sense of kinship and knowing with Tchaikovsky being gay – we hope he’s looking at us with his blessing knowing that what we couldn’t express openly in his life finally gets the chance to come to life.

Moment to watch for – I’m fascinated by the Russian word “drug”. Tchaikovsky uses it quite a bit and in his romances and Onegin and I don’t think it’s an accident. It’s a word transcending genders meaning alternatively: friend, beloved, spouse…in particular in the duel scene we have Onegin and Lensky essentially singing this love duet calling each other “drugs”…for us it just seems so obvious but those perpetuating the norms sure like ignoring them as hard as they can, don’t they?

barczablog: Which character in Onegin do you identify with? And what’s your favourite scene?

Mike aka Tanya: Well, personally I think it’s obvious! Tatyana! Since the beginning I identified with her in Act I – shy, dreaming, idealistic, awkward bookworm – but with deep passions and convictions. I like to think I’ve evolved in Act 3 Tatyana – I’ve found my Gremin and I put my duty and responsibility and the long-term over the short-term and the superficial. It’s the story of a person coming into their own and surprising those around them with the power within. I know not everyone gets her including our cast – someone called Tatyana “a wet blanket”, but that’s what’s wonderful about this opera. You have the dreamers and the skeptics, the lovers and the murderers, the redeemed and the unredeemable. I like to think Onegin is an “encyclopedia of love” – from familial to romantic, platonic, etc. and in our version we have all the combinations not usually seen in a hetero context!

barczablog: Do you have any future possibilities for adaptations in mind, possibly with cross-gender exploration..?

Mike aka Tanya: Well, in our Cleopatra show I’ll be tackling Barber’s rendition which is rather juicy. I’ve premièred Charmian in Marchand Knight’s “Cleopatra Built” which I supposed I’ll continue into our full presentation next summer (I had to replace one of of my own singers…as the quick study I am). Down the line I’m also interested in producing a “Sodom and Gomorrah” show, to tackle Salome and Samson. I’ve also been working on a collaboration with Haute Opera on a queerified Bluebeard. One day I also want to commission an opera called “Memoirs of a Gaysian” – somewhat autobiographical, about my life as a a closeted premed student turned fab opera-singing drag diva. Lots to unpack there. I definitely need to write a book or two which may be a tie-in…honestly there are enough ideas between us for several centuries I think. One step at a time!

barczablog: Is there a teacher or an influence you’d care to name that you especially admire?

Mike aka Tanya: Marianne Bendig Grandoni definitely comes to mind – my voice teacher in my 2nd undergrad at Laurier and someone I still try to see regularly. It was a real full circle moment bringing her to sing Gremin and giving her this opportunity to sing a drag role which is rare for her these days. Unfortunately Marianne is no longer able to join us for our shows but what happens in the rehearsal room is also important and it’s been wonderful having her there!

She represents the kind of intergenerational atmosphere I like to create in the rehearsal room – we have singers just out of undergrad to those well-seasoned looking for more openness than is usual in the “biz”. Mentors like Marianne keep that eternal youthful spirit of lifelong learning, enthusiasm, and openness devoid of ego or pretension given her calibre. We all have something to learn from each other at any stage!

*******

Tanya’s Secret produced by Opera Queens, is their adaptation of Eugene Onegin, Fri Aug 26 at 7 PM, or Sun, Aug 28 at 3 PM. (click here for ticket info)

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Interviews, Opera, Press Releases and Announcements | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Bas-Sheve: Yiddish opera at Ashkenaz Festival

An Opera in Yiddish by Henekh Kon, Libretto by Moishe Broderzon
August 31, September 1, September 2

Ashkenaz 2022 will feature the North American premiere of Henekh Kon’s “Bas-Sheve,” the only known pre-Holocaust Yiddish opera. Never performed after its 1924 premiere in Warsaw, and then only with piano accompaniment, the work was forgotten for decades before the only known existing manuscript of the piece was unearthed by German musicologist Dr. Diana Matut in 2017. The rediscovered work was also missing a number of pages from the climactic portion of the story. Matut enlisted renowned Toronto-based Yiddishist, Michael Wex, to complete the libretto with additional Yiddish texts. American klezmer musician and composer Joshua Horowitz was simultaneously engaged to orchestrate the entire piece and fill in the missing musical portions. Six new movements were eventually inserted into the score, along with additional transitions and choral parts, in order to complete it as a seamless opera. The newly re-constructed work was premiered to great acclaim in August 2019 as part of Germany’s Yiddish Summer Weimar festival.

Now, Ashkenaz will present a brand new concert production of Bas Sheve, directed by Neal Stulberg and featuring the UCLA Philharmonia, with soloists Jaclyn Grossman, Jonah Spungin, Marcel d’Entremont and Geoffrey Schellenberg. Produced through a tri-national partnership between Ashkenaz, Yiddish Summer Weimar and the UCLA Lowell Milken Center for Music of American Jewish Experience, with the support of the Canada Council for the Arts, Azrieli Foundation, Toronto Workmen’s Circle Foundation, Glenn Gould School at RCM, and the UJA Committee for Yiddish.

Discount code: YIDDSH10 for a 10% discount on Sept 1 or 2.

Co-presented with:

Lowell Milken Center For Music Of American Jewish Experience At UCLA
Yiddish Summer Weimar

Sponsored by:

Canada Council For The Arts
Azrieli Foundation
Toronto Workmen’s Circle Foundation
Glenn Gould School At RCM
Mickey Katz Endowed Chair In Jewish Music At The UCLA Herb Alpert School Of Music

Click for further info.

Posted in Opera, Press Releases and Announcements | Leave a comment

Who’s Afraid of Titus? Sky Gilbert isn’t.

The title Who’s Afraid of Titus? has at least three meanings I can see.

1: Performers who fear that audiences won’t come see an unfamiliar play.

2: Professors (Shakespeare theorists) confused by a play that doesn’t fit the usual template.

Sky Gilbert embraces the weirdly different as an affirmation of humanity. As a drama professor and queer activist exploring Shakespeare’s identity: NO he’s not afraid of Titus.

3: Who’s afraid in the usual sense: a violent scary story to make the audience cringe in fear.

Sky is the playwright, the performer, the professor, the activist. Read his Guelph university bio here …where they list him as an expert in Canadian theatre, Creative writing, Drag queens and kings, Gay, lesbian, and transgender politics, Noel Coward, Poetry, Queer theatre, Queer theory.

Sky Gilbert

A 2018 essay title caught my eye. “Shakesqueer in love: Exploring the Bard’s queer themes.”

Sky might be the most prolific writer I’ve ever encountered.

For example (and I don’t pretend that this list is complete):
2019: Shakespeare’s Criminal (opera libretto) my review
2020: Nice Day in the Park (play) my review
2020 Shakespeare Beyond Science: When Poetry Was the World (book) my review

2022 Pat and Skee (play) I missed it because it was done in Hamilton and I couldn’t get there.

Who’s Afraid of Titus? (Sky’s adaptation of Titus Andronicus) opens at the end of August in Toronto. I had to ask him about it.

Barczablog: You’ve chosen to present your show at “the uncanny Red Sandcastle Theatre” (your words not mine). I’m a huge fan of Eric Woolfe & the usual type of show we get at this venue. Is it a deliberate choice on your part to present Who’s Afraid of Titus in a space who promote themselves with the slogan “where anything is possible” and present lots of magic, horror / gothic shows?

Sky: It was a happy fate of circumstance that the show ended up here. I had been following Red Sandcastle all through COVID and I know Rosemary, and I have been keeping my eye out for post-Covid performance venues. Finally we are post-Covid (I hope) and I reached out to Red Sandcastle and discovered that Eric Woolfe was running it. I remember Eric from Buddies, I definitely read some of his scripts there, and I think he did something connected with Buddies, but it’s all so long ago — however the takeaway is that I have a lot of respect for Eric and his writing and his aesthetic.

Front door of Red Sandcastle Theatre

But it really was chance — as we started working on this Titus way back during Covid (when we could work, briefly, one summer, outdoors) but I was so happy not only to work in Eric’s space as he is so smart and so talented (I saw his latest show) but we share similar sensibilities.

Barczablog: Please talk for a moment about genre. Some academics dread the word, others build courses around the concept. (parenthetical question: Are you afraid of the word?)
So could we talk about things like “tragedy”, “horror” and “gothic”? they may be most useful in directing customers to the right channel / product when purchasing content
(I used to say “the right part of the store” but there are no more stores).

Is genre useful or do we spend too much time tripping over it (especially as students)?

Sky: At the present time genre is a marketing technique. I’ve been writing about action movies on my blog recently (I loved BULLET TRAIN) and that is because — as the Mega Entertainment Conglomerates use genre as a marketing tool, smart directors realize that if they follow the rules of a specific genre, and as in the case of Bullet Train — take them a little bit too literally, (i.e., with wit) they can come up with art. In other words, every movie you see now has to be a ‘genre’ movie (Am I into romcom? Well of course yes, if I’m old-fashioned enough to call myself female…. Am I into horror flics — well of course if I’m a teenager and want my girlfriend to grab onto me when when she’s scared etc). When you go to see a movie in a theatre the trailers are all of that genre — in fact if you go to see a movie with black actors they show you other trailers with black characters, only then do you get those ads —- it’s all about how marketing divides us and keeps us entrenched in our own comfy entertainments — and it is essentially racist and sexist and homophobic to boot. Anyway, enough of that rant. What David Leitch does in Bullet Train is use the tropes of the ‘action flick’ to make fun of action flicks and incidentally of wokeism. It’s hilarious — and he can get away with it (the worst thing that happens is the politically correct critics hate him on rotten tomatoes) because he is being true to genre but…not.

It would be wrong of me not to take the opportunity to mention that one of Shakespeare’s major innovations was his irreverence for genre (see the drunken doorkeep in Macbeth) so much so that his plays were sometimes incomprehensible and offensive to early modern audiences (but keep in mind some of them grew up with medieval passion plays that were anarchic in their own way). Shakespeare is constantly mixing genres, his comedies are sometimes very sad and his tragedies very funny. This comes from his readings of Hermogenes and his obsession with the rhetorical technique of mixing styles — unheard of in his time in the earliest examples of Renaissance drama. Everyone else wrote in one style at a time (the tragic style, or the comic style) Shakespeare mixed them all up. This still confuses us, and is very much the situation with Titus — one reason why it’s so important to see the play. Titus is somewhat of a farce tragedy. There’s only so much violence you can see, after all, without wishing it was all a cartoon.

Barczablog: I bring up genre for “who’s afraid of Titus” in case you might want to mention your approach, where you’re situating your adaptation re: genre. Will you cue us (spooky music, etc) or do you prefer to surprise your audience?

Sky: My concept of Titus is that it was written as an attack on didacticism, and as a manual on how NOT to read Ovid (this isn’t my idea, I read this interpretation somewhere, but since this is not an academic essay, I don’t have to tell you where!) . The characters in the play try to live their lives like characters in Ovid poems, which means they end up cooking people into pies, and raping them, and chopping off their hands and tongues.

Shakespeare’s message here is that theatre should not have a message (paradoxically) and that those who go to art to learn how to live are going to ruin their lives. I do not hint at my approach in the play, instead I try and hit the audience over the head with it. There is a narrator who constantly asks the audience to think about theatre as ‘harm.’ The audience is asked to think about how they perceive theatre, and how they have learned to process pain through their practices in the digital world (i.e social media and YouTube). Do we learn how to suffer from seeing microphones shoved into COVID-19 patients on TV? But I will say that Titus, and my production of it, are so alien to the present aesthetic and moral zeitgeist (these days we think we should only watch movies and plays that ‘improve’ us) that I have had to be somewhat explanatory about what I am doing in the play itself, because it’s just, well, new….(even though it’s as old as Shakespeare)

Barczablog: When I used to teach film music courses, we talked a lot about genre, something I spoke of as chicken & egg, because signifiers such as music are both drivers of genre and respond to it:
-producers/directors hire composer to make it recognizably “horror” or sci-fi.
-it’s how we recognize a genre (eg spooky music for horror, sci-fi music for sci-fi)
Do you come at this wanting to meet our horror expectations, or to surprise us? Will this be possibly scarier as a result?

Sky: I talked about genre a lot above so let me just say that the production will be both horrifying and funny. At least I think it will be. My work is almost always funny, I rarely have to work at that (if the actors are funny) but, when it comes to horrifying, the problem with me of course is that things that I find quite normal horrify other people. For instance promiscuous sex horrifies some people, sex without romance or ‘love’ (although I think all consensual sex is love) horrifies some people.

So I never know what horrifies them. I want the violence to be real, which means that I try and not put it in front of your face but instead incite your imagination. We’ll see if that works. On the one hand the play will not be like that one in London awhile ago (sorry can’t remember who did it) where they had buckets of blood spilling on the audience — they went high camp with this stuff. Not here. My adaptation centres on the rape of Lavinia (the play was sometimes called that, in its day, I think) and that I take very seriously and have a very radical take on it. Shakespeare took rape very seriously. Though occasionally male characters joke about it in his plays, you only have to read Lucrece to know how seriously Shakespeare took rape as a crime against women, and how important he felt it was to give a voice to women’s suffering. Lavinia is paradoxically silent through half of the play — but that is a Shakespearean paradox.

Barczablog: A play like Hamlet comes with baggage, namely zillions of interpreters & versions, crowding in on your desire to interpret. Does Titus offer you more freedom, given how much more space you have to play with the story, to make your own adaptation?

Sky: First of all Shakespeare has been rewritten since time immemorial. That’s what we do with Shakespeare. There are three versions of Hamlet around, and directors and editors mix and match (one of our favourite lines — ‘There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so’ — is from a bastard version of Hamlet — the first — bad— quarto — and co-incidentally my version of Titus resembles this first bad quarto of Hamlet — which people do perform occasionally — it’s ‘only the facts ma’am’ it cuts to the action, and the plot comes at you at a hurtling speed). One of the reasons we must adapt Shakespeare is because we are no longer rhetoricians, whereas every student in grammar school in England was a rhetorician, had access to Latin, and believed that language shaped reality. We reject the notion of language as powerful — although ‘stop the steal’ is a little poem with lots of power! — and we ignore the new rhetoric, which is digital media, mainly visual, not verbal, which however controls our lives to a frightening degree. But we don’t listen to words anymore — we don’t read poetry — and most importantly we don’t think that poetry can create another reality to rival ours, which is what Shakespeare believed, and what rhetoric taught him. But the genius of Shakespeare is that his plays are not didactic and cannot be boiled down to any moral idea. The anti-didactic ‘theme’ of Titus is actually just a ruse— the play, like all Shakespeare’s plays is about nothing at all but human beings, and human emotion, passion, love, hate, you know, all that stuff. Harold Bloom (God, I hate him!) said only one good thing really, that Shakespeare taught us how to feel. But Shakespeare also teaches us how to think, by not giving us answers to the questions he raises, and after all ,metaphor itself is a form of thought.

Barczablog: Shakespeare’s theatre contains some moments of unparalleled violence, thinking of King Lear, Macbeth, Hamlet (there are more of course). Do you believe that modern staging–more representational /real than in Shakespeare’s time—aids or defeats horror? And how might that inform your approach? (Would being less representational and relying more on an oral approach force us to use our imaginations)..?

Sky: I’ve sort of addressed this already. I would say that trying to bring on a bloody severed head or hand is just not going to work these days, not with Star Wars and with SAW 1.2.3 etc. So you just can’t do that. All horror is psychological anyway, really. Check out the shower scene in Psycho (no nudity, no actual violence) or the movie Midsommar. Let’s face it we don’t want to be moved in any way anymore, everything we watch on Netflix and at Mirvish Productions is designed to comfort us and make us feel more secure in who we are and the choices that we have made, and confirm that we are good people. People go to horror movies these days to laugh, to see ‘camp’ entertainment (but it isn’t truly camp, true camp is very serious and sad deep down) to make fun of how bad the movie is and anyhow it doesn’t really scare them. No one wants to be really scared or horrified anymore. We want comfort food and comfort entertainment and we are getting dangerously fat on all that. I’ve always been interested in work that challenges, unsettles and even horrifies.

Barczablog: Your promotional press speaks of “poeticised violence”. Please unpack that, explaining what you mean, how that applies to Titus. Do you mean this for any version of the play or yours in particular?

Sky: I mean that, as I have said right above, coincidentally (great minds think alike!) the only true horror and violence in art is poetic. It plays on our imagination and stimulates it. I remember when I was doing my play The Dressing Gown (long ago) and one woman who saw it said “Oh that scene where the one man brutally beat the boy and then had sex with him was so horrifying.” I told her that no beating took place. A whip was revealed and so were bare buttocks. That’s it. She filled in the rest with her imagination and it was a nightmare for her. I will say I have a pretty active imagination, which is why I don’t take hard drugs. A friend of mine (it was Christopher Newton) once said “I don’t take hard drugs. Someone said to me that people love taking chemicals because it turns people on the subway into monsters. Well the people on the subway already look like monsters to me, I don’t need drugs!”

Barczablog: Is this your first time doing / adapting Titus Andronicus?

Sky: It is my first time directing Shakespeare with professional actors, and even though this is a workshop presentation it’s incredibly scary.

If it doesn’t go well – I.e. if I think it’s ultimately no good — I won’t ever do it again. But I want to give it a try because of all my recent research into Shakespeare.

Barczablog: What’s the connection between Titus & your book? Is it because you’re investigating the Bard’s identity…?

Sky: I think I mentioned that I have a new book about Shakespeare coming out (not right away but eventually) with Guernica called Shakespeare Lied. I wanted to make sure that I mentioned that here. But I would say that after the reading I’ve done and the work I’ve done — one important revelation I’ve had, is that it makes no sense to ignore Shakespeare’s ‘difficult’ (inconvenient, incomprehensible works) — or claim they are written by someone else when he clearly had a hand in them. I am fascinated by Loves Labours Lost and Venus and Adonis, for instance, they are both works which are often ignored because there is something difficult and unpalatable about them. The same can be said about Titus. But if we can get our minds around Shakespeare’s most ‘quirky’ work, work that is distinctly his, we will understand better who he is and what he is about. I love Midsummer Nights Dream and Hamlet but they are more accessible, and that’s not where you learn the most about Shakespeare. Both Titus and Love’s Labours Lost are excessively and somewhat frighteningly about rhetoric (Hamlet and Midsummer Nights Dream are too — but there is a lot of other stuff going on to distract us, Shakespeare always wrote ABOUT rhetoric but in many different ways). So if we can tackle Titus and LLL we might ‘get Shakespeare.’

Brian Smegal — who plays Titus in my production— has gotten me interested in Timon of Athens (he’s such a bastard for doing that!) And I am fascinated by Timon — because it is so strange, but therefore so ‘Shakespearean.

Barczablog: How does presenting Titus “as a queer play” work? Do you alter genders or behaviour of any characters, recalling the absence of female actors on Shakespeare’s stage.

Sky: There is a woman who plays a man and a man who plays a woman. And there are two biological women on stage having sex together at one point. I think that’s all pretty gay. (But ideas about what is gay have certainly changed over the years, this play is not about getting married and adopting twins, so maybe so people might think it’s not gay at all!) I also think it’s gay, because there is lots of sex in the play and at times I hope the play will be camp, both funny and sad at the same time.

Barczablog: Would you / could you argue that your version (ignoring the questions of length in your adaptation) is in some respect authentic, for that reason (that there were no women on Shakespeare’s stage): OR am I being too reductive?

Sky: There is no such thing as an ‘authentic’ Shakespeare production. First of all the plays were produced outdoors at The Globe with no lighting (at the Blackfriars there were candles) and there was very little in the way of costumes and sets. Most importantly all the women’s roles were played by boys age 10-17. This tells us that the plays were about the words. People listened to words and stories back then as there was an oral tradition. And that is not the least of it. At any rate we know very little (to quote my theatre history teacher at grad school at U of T) about theatre production in Shakespeare’s time, but we know it was severely representational — and not realistic — in the sense of method acting, so it would probably seem very strange to us today. But anyone who claims to be doing an accurate production is lying — we simply do not have enough information about what it was like to live and think and love in early modern times to offer authentic Shakespeare today.

Barczablog: Is the core of the story HORROR? (apt for Red Sandcastle theatre)?

Sky: I would say it’s pretty apt for Red Sandcastle folk. (Nothing can quite measure up to Eric Woolfe’s portrayal of Kafka’s Metamorphosis with stuffed animals, but I am doing my best!)

Eric Woolfe in mid-Metamorphosis

Barczablog: Did you involve Eric Woolfe in any of your preparation / adaptation?

Sky: No but we have talked a lot and he is a great inspiration to me and I know his work. It’s a pleasure to have the privilege to work in such an atmosphere of support and frankly intelligence and wit.

Barczablog: Suspense aids our engagement and catharsis. Please talk about violence (whether contemplated or genuine) and the role it plays in gaining our engagement with a story and its role in possible catharsis (fear, relief etc).

Sky: I have talked about this a lot above, but basically I would have to say that I really don’t know what is horrible. What’s horrible to me is the nuclear family. What’s horrible to me is human hypocrisy. It terrifies me. So I never know what’s going to horrify anyone else.

Barczablog: In your promotion of the play, you ask two fascinating questions namely
“Does art harm us? Should it?” So, as a professor perhaps disillusioned by plagiarism, illiteracy and smartphones in class, do you ever observe (and even identify with) the sadism implicit in some texts as a response to the vulnerability of the performer, exposed on stage? As a lecturer do you have comparable sensations of vulnerability fueling your desire to avenge yourself upon a classroom or an audience?

Sky: Hm. The best I can say is that I think that if we are never ‘harmed’ as children, we grow up as very warped neurotic people. Of course I don’t think anyone should be abused, and I don’t want children to suffer. But we live in such a ‘sheltered’ ‘correct’ ‘sensitive’ society nowadays, that is all about hurt feelings. Whatever happened to ‘sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me’? I know of this personally because I led a very sheltered childhood, and was much loved by a mother who made me feel that I was too fragile for this world (this is not true, by the way. I loved my mother dearly and my play Pat and Skee is about her) But really, though we want to protect our children from illness and death and accidents, they must and should have ‘bad experiences.’ I don’t know how to tell you this but sometimes life seems like one bloody thing after another, and we need to be resilient , not protected always, and art can be a part of creating that resilience.

Barczablog: Do you want to thank / acknowledge any influences, assistance on the project?

Sky: I’m kinda doing it on my own but the actors have to some degree been accomplices, especially Brian Smegal. Also the Shakespeare Oxford fellowship — Mark Anderson, Alexander Waugh, Roger Stritmatter and Lynn Kositsky.

*******

Eldritch Theatre presents a Titus-on-the-Run Productions Workshop Presentation,
WHO’S AFRAID OF TITUS?
Who was Shakespeare? Does it matter?
Well Sky Gilbert thinks he was an aesthete — a poet whose plays are about poetry and its effect on us.

In tackling Titus Andronicus, perhaps Shakespeare’s most baffling play — Gilbert is drawing on his research for his new book Shakespeare Beyond Science: When Poetry Was the World (released in 2020 by Guernica Editions). Gilbert has now adapted Titus Andronicus for a post-Covid era, asking the question on all our minds Who’s Afraid of Titus Andronicus?. Gilbert reduces Titus Andronicus to one hour and 18 concise scenes; the language is there, the story is there — and yes, there is a reason for doing this play now. Gilbert presents Titus as a queer play about poeticised violence, and asks (but does not answer) the question. Does art harm us? Should it?

Titus features a stellar cast including Brian Smegal (Stratford Festival) as Titus, Ellen-Ray Hennessy (Canada’s Queen of Voice and Animation) as Tamora, Sandy Crawley (movies galore; Green Party candidate) as Marcus, Veronika Hurnik (paula and karl, DNA Theatre/Six Stages) as the Narrator, and Augusta Monet as Lavinia. The production also features Ray Jacildo, George Alevizos, Max Ackerman and John Humeniuk.

Sky Gilbert

WHO’S AFRAID OF TITUS?
Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus

Adapted & Directed by Sky Gilbert

August 31 to September 3rd, 2022
at the uncanny Red Sandcastle Theatre
922 Queen St East, Toronto

$15 Arts Worker/$25 Advance/$35 Door
6:30PM Doors/7:00 Evening Showtime
2:30PM Doors/3:00 Saturday Matinee
approximately 1 hour, no intermission
Click for tickets & information

Posted in Books & Literature, Cinema, video & DVDs, Dance, theatre & musicals, Interviews, Popular music & culture, Press Releases and Announcements | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Competing icons at the RCM: Gould, Liszt and others

It’s a branding exercise to give a building a name. Roy Thomson has his hall. Both Rogers and Four Seasons have Centres.

They already have The Glenn Gould School in the Royal Conservatory of Music. So why not also give him a wall?

Or so I’m thinking since seeing Gould’s Wall, a site specific opera Tapestry Opera premiered for the Royal Conservatory on Bloor Street West with music composed by Brian Current and a libretto by Liza Balkan.

At the most literal level it would seem to christen the inner Atrium wall. After seeing this show will we ever look upon that bumpy old surface again without thinking it’s in some sense Gould’s wall?

Although come to think of it, for me it will be Lauren Pearl’s Wall. She’s the one risking her life flying up and down on wires. I hope that isn’t heresy.

Lauren Pearl as Louise in Gould’s Wall (photo: Dahlia Katz)

To be truthful, I’m aware that it’s an illusion that she was truly risking her life. Yes it seems dangerous, indeed that perception of danger is a goal. But the reason you have careful rehearsals is to ensure that the aerialist is not truly in danger.

There was a magic moment when Lauren seemed to “whoops” and everyone leaned forward in terror, reminded of the danger she faced, hanging above the floor so far below. I’d have to think this was a contrived moment, not a genuine slip with real danger. We watch stage-fights where actors seem to die, we see all sorts of things simulated that are not real. Creating that illusion of danger is a big deal.

I recall hearing an anecdote from a friend, telling me of a time when safety personnel watching her practice (aerials using silks), who decided that she must be in danger. But that is what practice is for, to ensure that what seems dangerous is not truly life-threatening.

As if that weren’t enough Lauren faces additional challenges singers don’t usually encounter. Ever notice how singers will carefully plant their feet, set themselves up to sing? It’s rare for example to see someone sing while lying down or while walking or while moving. That’s because the act of singing is already a physical activity involving our muscles, especially the diaphragm. To sing while also moving about throws things into flux, undoing the careful foundation of support that singers usually want to establish for their vocal production.

I remember a workshop (I wish I could recall the singer who led it) at the Festival of Original Theatre (aka FOOT) in 2005 at the University of Toronto. We were rolling round on the floor in a rehearsal room while trying to sing. For those of us who thought we knew how to sing? It was humbling, a shock to discover that wow it’s so much harder to sing steadily when the tumbling action screws up your support, your vocal production, as though suddenly you’re a beginner. The workshop leader could do it. I suppose with practice we also might have learned how to do it, to practice this new discipline.

Clearly Lauren Pearl knew how, singing Brian Current’s score including some remarkably high notes while flying around on the end of a wire.

As I was thinking about the space I remembered another powerful presence from musical history whose spirit informs the downstairs corridors of the RCM, not far from the site to be used for the performance of Gould’s Wall.

There’s a seven foot tall sculpture of Franz Liszt, aka Liszt Ferenc as we Magyars might like to say it.

Statue of Franz Liszt by Géza Stremeny, donated by Tamás Fekete,

It’s common for Hungarians to adapt. It was never Solti György, but rather Georg Solti. I suppose in the music business it has always been a better career move to use the German version of a name. For Solti and Liszt that seemed to work better.

Liszt is an artist who might seem to signify the direct opposite sort of persona to Gould, which is why I spoke of “competing icons”, at least in my mind.

In an article from 2014 Hungarian Free Press by György Lázár reports as follows:

A whole-figure statue of Ferenc Liszt has been inaugurated at the Royal Conservatory of Music in Toronto. Jeff Embleton the Manager of Public Relations mailed me the photo of the 7 feet (2.25m) tall sculpture which was generously donated by Mr. Tamás Fekete, a Canadian with Hungarian roots, who arrived to Canada after 1956… The sculptor is also Hungarian, Géza Stremeny.
(link to report )

At this point no one is nominating Liszt to compete with Gould as the spirit of the RCM. I’m simply a huge fan, and believe Liszt is under-rated. If you only know him from his most famous pieces (the Mephisto Waltz, the 2nd Hungarian Rhapsody, the well-known Liebestraum melody) you’d probably roll your eyes at my assertion. Liszt championed Berlioz & Wagner (to name but two composers) who would have had a much more difficult time without the piano transcriptions that helped popularize their music.

I couldn’t help noticing that while these two will share the same space inside the RCM, Gould and Liszt are opposites. Gould refused to perform in public, while Lisztomania (his reception by the public) was the prototype for the modern media frenzy of super-stardom.

Speaking of that wall, I think Current’s music resembles the architecture.

Brian Current

The RCM buildings combine old and new styles into a whole, in a style we might call “post-modern”. I doubt that Current was consciously imitating the eclectic mix, but his musical choices vary broadly, at times offering us a romantic sound-world, at times dissonant. There’s a moment when the libretto speaks of dodecaphony (if I recall correctly), a word I would assume means the twelve-tone approach to music we know from composers such as Schoenberg: but I couldn’t be sure whether that’s reflected precisely in what Current composed. My understanding of po-mo is a refusal or even a repudiation of modernism, including a willingness to recycle and repurpose the old, to combine and mix, to be pluralistic and eclectic rather than adhering to a single objective.

Opera by Wagner or Richard Strauss would be the modernist prototypes, with unified styles supporting the aim of Gesamtkuntswerk, or total art. The post-modern would turn from their ideal indeed Gould’s Wall is not at all like something from Wagner or Strauss. It’s more meditation than story, what Pirandello might have titled “a series of scenes in search of an ideal”. This is a pragmatic score, the music serving its purposes much like the different parts of the RCM building.

I was very grateful that Tapestry offered us a printed copy of the libretto.

The last page of the libretto. Notice that it says
“PLEASE RETURN ON YOUR WAY OUT”

Being a nerd I followed along dutifully, as I wanted to be sure I knew what was going on.

Is that crazy? Greg Finney, who was seated beside me, seemed to be watching the action: which is arguably the sane thing to do especially when a performer seems to be risking their life in front of you.

Greg would be the first person to tell you: he knows how to enjoy himself. Indeed he’s the life of the party.

Three writers, namely Greg Finney, moi and Lydia Perović

I wanted to be sure I knew what they were singing, especially if I was going to presume to offer comments on Current’s and Balkan’s opera. I wish I could see the score.

I am going to repeat something I keep saying over and over. Projected titles are a huge asset. RUR (in May) worked really well because we knew what they were singing, thanks to the projected titles. Perhaps there was no place to project titles at the RCM so that we could all see them (recalling the very wide but narrow audience). Too bad, as the ideal would be to watch the aerialist instead of staring at the printed libretto.

Gould’s Wall continues until August 12th.

Posted in Art, Architecture & Design, Books & Literature, Music and musicology, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gould’s Wall

Tapestry Opera have premiered Brian Current’s new site-specific work Gould’s Wall, an event that adds another layer to the association between the Royal Conservatory of Music and one of their most distinguished alumni Glenn Gould.

Ruth Abernethy’s statue of Glenn Gould.

I like it more than I expected. We knew the visual component –especially Lauren Pearl climbing the wall of the RCM on a wire—would be electrifying.

For years now we’ve been watching various sorts of aerial performance, usually decorative eye candy rather than an expressive choice essential to the material being presented. What a wonderful novelty to watch this kind of movement when it’s inseparable from the story.

Some of the scenes work better than others. Liza Balkan’s libretto assembles the abstract materials for Brian Current’s score. Less story than meditation, the mature Glenn Gould onstage portrayed by Roger Honeywell is the avatar of quirky creativity resisting structure. It’s the cranky middle-aged genius rather than the young prodigy, although perhaps this is to be understood as Glenn’s immortal essence. Louise might be any of us striving to be better. Her climb is a suitable metaphor for the process of learning, complete with the fear of falling, the genuine sense of risk.

Speaking of which it’s fascinating to observe the audience reactions to Lauren’s apparent danger, as she seems to be on the verge of falling. The extreme narrowness of the audience and stage heighten the drama.

The show is a spectacle not unlike a circus –given that we do see aerial performances in a circus—even as Louise and Glenn revolt against that aspect of live performance.

It’s been a crazy year for Tapestry, two big shows delayed due to COVID, both hugely successful. Both RUR (opened in May) and now Gould’s Wall were years in the making. Artistic Director Michael Mori is on a winning streak, the most important creator of new opera in town. After Michael brought Nicky Lizée and Nicolas Billon together for RUR, carefully nurturing their collaboration over several years, now he’s done it again with Gould’s Wall, this time employing composer Brian Current and librettist Liza Balkan, with stage direction by Philip Akin.

Michael Hidetoshi Mori, Tapestry Opera’s General Director

We were given copies of the libretto, likely because the text is difficult to discern without projected titles; I wonder whether the option of printing the libretto was perhaps cheaper than figuring out how to project titles on the many surfaces of the venue. At times I wanted to look up at the performers, especially Lauren moving about on the wire.

Current’s score is mostly tonal and quite stunning. The last pages were especially compelling, the opera captured by its own big ideas. On the last pages of the score we’re hearing about the “futility of living by the advice of others”, about the “past and future on the vertical and horizontal plane”, or that “it’s all about the climb.” Current’s music matched the poetry of those last images from Balkan.

The score for an ensemble of 18 (seven winds, five string players and five pianos plus a percussionist) is often played on one or more piano, but punctuated by several larger eruptions from the ensemble at the base of the wall. The acoustic of the space must have been daunting (I understood fewer than half the words during the obligatory opening speeches), especially for the conductor. Tonight’s show was led tightly by Jennifer Tung.

Balkan’s libretto features some clever solutions to the challenges she faced, dramatizing abstractions and ideas. There are places in her libretto where she makes a kind of music out of short phrases, many only one word long.

I’m always wondering with new operas whether anyone might want to stage them again. Gould’s Wall may be site specific, but I think it would be worth doing somewhere else, if the right space were found. Glenn Gould is a well-known figure, purveyor of original ideas known far beyond this city. While I’ve joked that Toronto is Gould’s Burg that doesn’t mean we’re the only ones who would enjoy this opera.

The audience erupted with satisfaction, the piece not overly long, totally engaging and irresistible.

While I believe the run is sold out I’m hopeful that the run might be extended. Further info click here.

Posted in Art, Architecture & Design, Dance, theatre & musicals, Music and musicology, Opera, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Immortal Glenn Gould

I want to write something about Glenn Gould. Who is he, what is his legacy in 2022?

I’m thinking about what GG means to me as I anticipate Tapestry Opera’s premiere of Gould’s Wall, a new site-specific opera opening August 4th, that would seem to dramatize the ongoing influence of the great pianist based on what I surmise from the program.

Louise is
A young, extraordinarily talented artist and musician on a quest to uncover her own voice.

Glenn is
“The presence of Mr. Gould. He is Inspiration. Consciousness. Sub-consciousness. Support. The Artist. The Icon. The Man. One might call him a ghost, but he is 100% real and present: an inhabitant of the wall and the building

The third and arguably most important character in the opera is the site namely The Wall. As composer Brian Current tells us in his program note:
“Since the beautiful new Royal Conservatory building was completed in 2009, the inner Atrium wall has been crying out to become the setting of a vertical opera. Huge thanks to librettist Liza Balkan and Tapestry’s Artistic Director Michael Mori for creating such a wonderful theatrical premise to fit the site.”

I’m reminded of the 1984 appearance of Sankai Juku in Toronto, performing butoh suspended from the sides of buildings in Toronto. Whatever the aesthetic, when the art transcends our experience and our expectation we move into the realm of “the happening.”

I suspect that’s to be the likely impact of Gould’s Wall. You can read more about the show here.

Here’s what I think of when I contemplate Glenn Gould.

He grew up in the east end of town. There’s a plaque somewhere (Victoria Park I think) attesting to this fact.

He was a great talent, but unique in his choice to give up live performance, offering his work exclusively through various media such as recordings, television, or radio.

He had a special relationship with the CBC, seemingly understanding the impact of media at least as well as Marshall McLuhan. It’s perfect that his likeness sits on a bench in front of the CBC building on Front St, sculpted by Ruth Abernethy.

Sculptor Ruth Abernethy with her statue of Glenn Gould. (Laurie Allen/CBC)

His choice to stop live performance made sense given that he seemed to be someone who was more introverted than extroverted, a quirky genius. I say that without ever meeting him or knowing him. But he made the transition to cultural icon partly through rumours and stories. His piano was supposedly prepared differently; he sat lower to the keyboard than what we’re usually taught (or so said my teacher).

He died too young. Gould was born on September 25 1932, and died October 4 1982. I can’t help noticing he was born and he died in the sign of libra (the scales… not the kind of scales we play at the piano but rather the sort we use to weigh things), a classical symmetry also seen in his name (five letters in both the first and last names).

Yes, we’re coming up on his 90th birthday.

Gould seems especially relevant in this post-pandemic era of virtual work, dating, meeting, concertizing and living. He was ahead of his time. It’s funny that Gould’s Wall is in a sense celebrating him as an icon in live performance even though he could be the avatar for Zoom and the online concert experience.

The premiere of Gould’s Wall was delayed by the pandemic, postponed until its arrival next week. While that might be understood as a logistical disaster—particularly for Michael Mori and his team at Tapestry Opera—it might be a good thing. What was brand new received extra rehearsal for its second coming, making it just a bit more sure-handed, the music more secure.

Gould is associated with the music of JS Bach, especially a pair of recordings of the Goldberg Variations that bracket his life (one in his youth, one much later) like bookends. Apt for a libra.

I have been most interested in Gould’s relationship to three pieces. While none of them are by Bach, old JS lurks in the background for these three like a ghost. Originally we encountered these three in a recording of piano transcriptions of the music of Richard Wagner: the prelude to Die Meistersinger, the Dawn & Rhine-Journey from Gotterdammerung, and the Siegfried Idyll. I can’t decide whether Gould’s approach points at the influence of Bach on Wagner or simply shows us Gould’s own fascination with counterpoint, bringing out something in Wagner that I’d never noticed.

Later Gould published the transcriptions. Two of them are oxymorons in the sense that they aren’t really playable by a single person in live performance, but require either a second pianist or –as in Gould’s case—the overdubbing of a second pianist into a recording.

“5” is the Siegfried-Idyll, “6” the Meistersinger Prelude while the page is open to an unplayable passage in Siegfried’s Rhine Journey. Buddha had nothing to say.

It’s arguably a practical joke he was playing on those who would insist on live performance.

Somewhere I think Glenn is laughing.

Posted in Art, Architecture & Design, Books & Literature, Dance, theatre & musicals, Music and musicology, Opera | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rebuilding Janise: Andrew Smith’s labour of love

The cover picture is a disturbing metaphor for its subject.

In 1992 Andrew and Janise were married.

This poem “What Once Was”, is by Andrew Smith, posted in July 2022 on Facebook.

what once was; is so long ago.
two fools, insanely naïve;
i pinch myself; it’s not a dream.

what once was, left many clues.
there are pictures and videos,
people’s memories,
of that time & all that was seen.

what once was, is our foundation.
keeps us solid & built to last.
standing strong;
despite life’s storms.

what once was, a gift we share.
has brought us to our life; here.
& now a feeling that is so blessed
& now a love that is so stron
g.

Tomorrow, July 25th, is their 30th anniversary. By coincidence today July 24th is the 35th anniversary of when Erika and I started living together. It’s fun to post this book review today, with the coincidental anniversaries.

I know Andrew Smith as my accountant, the man I see once a year at tax time. Through social media I discovered that he wrote a book: “Rebuilding Janise: A Family’s First Year After A Stroke”

The subtitle gives you a perfect synopsis, but there’s a lot more to it.

Janise Smith had a stroke March 18, 2019. The event impacted the whole family, meaning Janise, Andrew and their sons.

Andrew explains in his introduction that “before Janise’s stroke we were an affluent Black Canadian family with Caribbean roots. Janise managed the family and was always in the midst of organizing events to support the female movers and shakers of the Scarborough area of Toronto Ontario.

That was before.

He tells us that “after her stroke everything in our lives changed. Our family dynamics and our individual and our collective roles were impacted beyond our imagination. Starting with the crisis of finding Janise unconscious, the frenzied drive to the hospital, and then the uncertainty of whether she would live, as a family, we faced what it truly means to love and back each other through adversity.

In a way this book makes perfect sense, given what we know of Andrew. Every year when Erika and I visit with our assorted notes, he makes order out of our chaos, the receipts, T4s and T4-As, our muttered pleas for mercy & understanding.

Save us from the CRA Andrew! Okay I may be exaggerating. But our visits are full of laughter and joy. Andrew is the most fun we’ve ever had with an accountant, by far.

Given his usual meticulous attention to the details of our lives, his patience with our stories, his ability to drill down to find the rules we need to know, he would be the ideal helper. Andrew was always very kind & gentle examining our various documents and patiently hearing our anecdotes. At times he feels less like an accountant and more like a father confessor or a psychotherapist.

He’s good at what he does.

Of course there’s also the matter of his relationship to Janise. This might be the most romantic enterprise I’ve ever encountered. I remember asking him whether he had seen the film 50 First Dates, which is a very romantic movie that reminds me of the challenges they face, with some parallels to the patient daily structure Andrew brings to his family life.

The book reports the day by day progress of Janise with her loving partner & caregiver Andrew resembling a journal in some respects.

I think the discipline has been also been good for him, getting him to meditate, to write, to exercise. He has the soul of a poet, nurtured by his routine and his discipline.

There is an ongoing positive vibe to the book, gratitude for what they have as a loving family, dodging the more serious outcomes while looking ahead with hope to better days.

Andrew Smith

Andrew has an unusual sense of humour, self-deprecating, making fun at the darkest moments. I feel privileged to be taken into the presence of these feelings he shares with us, not papering over the messier aspects of rehabilitation.

It’s personal for me having seen something similar in my mother’s rehab at Bridgepoint Hospital. While my mom is much older, what she faced is simple compared to the aftermath of Janise’s stroke. I wonder if I connect better with this account of Andrew and Janise because I had my own look at rehab. As I ponder my relationship with my mom & her ongoing challenges I’m aware that the story has two sides to it, as much the drama of the healthy caregiver as a portrayal of a person doing rehab.

There’s a lot to it, as you may discover in your turn.

Andrew Smith’s Rebuilding Janise is available from Amazon in both in e-version & paperback editions. To find him click here.

Andrew posted this useful chart concerning stroke.

Posted in Books & Literature, Food, Health and Nutrition, My mother, Personal ruminations & essays, Psychology and perception, Reviews | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Scary Dead Broke

I saw Will King’s darkly comic Dead Broke today at the Toronto Fringe.

I was blown away by King’s first play From the Water in December 2018, amazingly good for a first play. This one is better, unfolding in a remarkably economical 60 minutes.

(L to R): Claire Shenstone-Harris, Gordon Harper, Will King, Courtney Keir, Elle Reimer
(photo by Calvin Petersen & Will King)

I often see operas, dance works or spoken theatre creations running 70 to 80 minutes where I swear they’re padded to seem more substantial, when they could have told their story in an hour or less. Yes a Hamlet or a Parsifal take longer.

King packs a great deal into his 60 minutes. Every word counts.

King also portrays his gormless protagonist Oliver alongside Courtney Keir, Claire Shenstone-Harris, Gordon Harper and Elle Reimer, a strong and believable cast creating suspense, directed by Calvin Petersen.

Here’s the promotional blurb from The Fringe website:

Oliver, a university student, is in trouble. After switching majors and losing all financial support, he begins squatting in an abandoned home to reduce costs and save his relationship. But when the house is revealed to have a sinister past, and someone goes missing, Oliver’s life spirals desperately out of control. This surreal thriller, and dark ensemble comedy, asks us what we do when we are at a point of identity crisis. What’s the cost of living for nothing?

The life of a 20-something artist can be pretty scary even without a father cutting off financial support, unexpected plot twists, romance & mysterious sounds in the night. When you add the possibility of drugs to alter consciousness, reality itself becomes more & more tenuous.

I really love the existential ambiguities created in King’s text. I’m not exactly sure what I saw in the hour of Dead Broke, which is totally enjoyable, very cool.

There are four more performances of Dead Broke, July 13, 14, 16 and 17 @ Tarragon’s Extraspace. Click for further info.

Posted in Dance, theatre & musicals, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment